Kevin De Bruyne

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
It's an entire proposition altogether. We're discussing top player legacies, scouts are interested in finding young, unheard of talent for a reasonable price
It's a fair point on legacy. KDB's biggest problem has been City's poor showing the CL though. Belgium have actually done well if people are realistic. They were third at the last World Cup and the last eight of the Euros is still a good achievement for a side in decline. Don't forget that the Euros is a very strong competition, 7 out of the top 10 FIFA ranked teams are in the competition so its basically stacked and a different order of magnitude compared to the Copa America.

Compare him to Ozil, would you say that KDB's legacy is greater than Ozil the World Cup winner and European Champion?

For me KDB will always be regarded as the greater player than Ozil but perhaps some other people think differently.
 

Ibn Battuta

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Messages
69
Supports
Chelsea
Best midfielder in the world for me by far. Clearly wasn't totally fit yesterday but Belgium and KDB himself obviously thought it was worth the risk in a knockout scenario. I thought he looked awesome too first half however he did fade badly in the second.

He'd walk into any team in the world and if you don't think this then footy isn't for you. He has everything in his game.
He is brilliant. The power on his foot is his greatest asset IMO. Many players have good vision but he can play power passes standing still with great precision. It’s incredible to watch.

My only criticism, which is not based on a lot of matches I admit, is that he is only good when he decided to be switched on. He doesn’t seem to have that dogged focus of players like Iniesta who when he is on the pitch is always looking for way to do maximum damage to the opponent.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,551
It's an entire proposition altogether. We're discussing top player legacies, scouts are interested in finding young, unheard of talent for a reasonable price
i wasnt discussing anyones legacy. Simple disagree that he isnt one of the best players around simply because his team hasnt won a major International tournament especially when the manager isnt very good

Teams winning doesnt correlate with a specific individuals talent. Messi also hasnt won anything with Argentina
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,884
Location
New York City
It's a fair point on legacy. KDB's biggest problem has been City's poor showing the CL though. Belgium have actually done well if people are realistic. They were third at the last World Cup and the last eight of the Euros is still a good achievement for a side in decline. Don't forget that the Euros is a very strong competition, 7 out of the top 10 FIFA ranked teams are in the competition so its basically stacked and a different order of magnitude compared to the Copa America.

Compare him to Ozil, would you say that KDB's legacy is greater than Ozil the World Cup winner and European Champion?

For me KDB will always be regarded as the greater player than Ozil but perhaps some other people think differently.
It's an interesting question - I think Ozil was top class for a good couple of years, but faded badly due to laziness and playing for Arsenal didn't really help. Winning the WC in Brazil was a magnificent achievement, so he'll always have that.

KDB is a great player but there's always a but with him. Injuries, luck, choices whatever it is seem to conspire against him winning anything internationally. He plays for a team that is the bookies' perennial favorites to win the CL, for the best coach (TM), with a team with no budget constraints. Just one finals appearance is too little, considering teams like Chelsea and Liverpool have actually won it. Not to mention Madrid, Bayern, Barca have won it multiple times during Kev's career.

And yes, Belgium should have won something, anything. Portugal did win a Euro cup and Nation's League, and on paper they're ranked worse (although I disagree with the rankings vehemently).

As I said great player but...
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,781
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
Not really. Its just a point of comparison, not a rant even if your read it like one.

Pogba was fantastic for France the game they got knocked out. Gave the ball away but created everything and won the ball back for their second goal too if we are arguing semantics.

Yet he was blamed instantly by most pundits and was the major discussion point.

Meanwhile KDB was very poor tonight. Created one or two nice chances but otherwise very poor. 57% pass completion and lost the ball 25 times.

Yet the pundits weren't instantly blaming him for the loss.

Interesting is all.

For me neither are to blame for their Country's exit although Pogba did far more to keep his country in the competition than KDB.

France got knocked out more cause of Pavard and Mbappe if they where to blame individuals.
The media just loves KDB. A Pogba isn't liked at all. Its similar to how the media looks at LM10 and CR7. The first is taken as a 'down to earth' the second as " proud and full of himself'.....
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,905
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
Best midfielder in the world for me by far. Clearly wasn't totally fit yesterday but Belgium and KDB himself obviously thought it was worth the risk in a knockout scenario. I thought he looked awesome too first half however he did fade badly in the second.

He'd walk into any team in the world and if you don't think this then footy isn't for you. He has everything in his game.
He is brilliant. The power on his foot is his greatest asset IMO. Many players have good vision but he can play power passes standing still with great precision. It’s incredible to watch.

My only criticism, which is not based on a lot of matches I admit, is that he is only good when he decided to be switched on. He doesn’t seem to have that dogged focus of players like Iniesta who when he is on the pitch is always looking for way to do maximum damage to the opponent.
It's an interesting question - I think Ozil was top class for a good couple of years, but faded badly due to laziness and playing for Arsenal didn't really help. Winning the WC in Brazil was a magnificent achievement, so he'll always have that.

KDB is a great player but there's always a but with him. Injuries, luck, choices whatever it is seem to conspire against him winning anything internationally. He plays for a team that is the bookies' perennial favorites to win the CL, for the best coach (TM), with a team with no budget constraints. Just one finals appearance is too little, considering teams like Chelsea and Liverpool have actually won it. Not to mention Madrid, Bayern, Barca have won it multiple times during Kev's career.

And yes, Belgium should have won something, anything. Portugal did win a Euro cup and Nation's League, and on paper they're ranked worse (although I disagree with the rankings vehemently).

As I said great player but...
I consistently fail to see why people believe he is the best in his position on the planet. Great player though
he's great as an impact/moments player. Best midfielder in the world by far is just hype. He looks world class via highlights
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
I feel Messi would play better than De Bruyne in midfield.
I don’t disagree with your assertion, but I’m not sure how great your original point of not being the best midfielder in the world is that when you’re questioned on it, your answer is to name a player who isn’t a midfielder
 

SATA

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
15,237
Location
We all love United
Wonderful player. I'm jealous he plays for City. Not sure if he can play with Bruno in the same team but boy, what would i give to see that
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Modric? What's the timeframe? This year alone or last 5?
Modric is probably the only one I can think of who has been close to him over last 5 years. He has been a great little player. One of my favourites actually.

However I still don't think he's quite as good as KDB.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,905
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
I don’t disagree with your assertion, but I’m not sure how great your original point of not being the best midfielder in the world is that when you’re questioned on it, your answer is to name a player who isn’t a midfielder
I never said he isn't. I said he isn't "by far" the best in the world
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
I never said he isn't. I said he isn't "by far" the best in the world
That’s fair enough, I’d still disagree with

he's great as an impact/moments player. Best midfielder in the world by far is just hype. He looks world class via highlights
that as an assessment though. World class is a fairly intangible label and everyone will have their own criteria as to what constitutes being world class, but if KDB isn’t world class with the consistency he’s shown over the past 5 years, virtually no players are. Being the best in your position over a period of time should basically cement being world class

I also disagree with the notion that he looks better via highlights, as watching him week in week out you get a greater appreciation for his decision making, and how consistently he can create chances over a full game.
 

welshwingwizard

Full Member
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
492
Location
London
It's an interesting question - I think Ozil was top class for a good couple of years, but faded badly due to laziness and playing for Arsenal didn't really help. Winning the WC in Brazil was a magnificent achievement, so he'll always have that.

KDB is a great player but there's always a but with him. Injuries, luck, choices whatever it is seem to conspire against him winning anything internationally. He plays for a team that is the bookies' perennial favorites to win the CL, for the best coach (TM), with a team with no budget constraints. Just one finals appearance is too little, considering teams like Chelsea and Liverpool have actually won it. Not to mention Madrid, Bayern, Barca have won it multiple times during Kev's career.

And yes, Belgium should have won something, anything. Portugal did win a Euro cup and Nation's League, and on paper they're ranked worse (although I disagree with the rankings vehemently).

As I said great player but...
This is the problem. You need to compare how Ozil was considered at Madrid for it to be a fair comparison. The Ozil at Arsenal has diminished his legacy (like Rooney staying too long with us has a bit). Ozil was an outstanding player.

KdB at City v Ozil at Madrid are equal I would say.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Modric is probably the only one I can think of who has been close to him over last 5 years. He has been a great little player. One of my favourites actually.

However I still don't think he's quite as good as KDB.
KDB is currently the best in the world, but still would take Modric in the last 5 years and definitely Modric at his peak.

The other one that might be in contention, albeit a lot different player is Kante, who on his day is worth 2 midfielders.
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,156
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
This says a lot to me. Can you imagine what Kevin De Bruyne would do with a 25 year old Cristiano Ronaldo ahead of him?
Özil's final third passing consistently outperformed everyone else's during his peak. He was averaging 4 key passes per game where the second best was around 2.5 to 3. He even beat Messi in that time and was the only one who was able to keep up with his assist stats. So I don't think he'd look even better than Özil behind Cristiano. But then again, Özil was a specialist (elite passer, great dribbler) while de Bruyne is a generalist (long shots, passing, crossing, strength, defending, etc) and a much better and more professional leader than him.
 

MrEleson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
2,547
But then again, Özil was a specialist (elite passer, great dribbler) while de Bruyne is a generalist (long shots, passing, crossing, strength, defending, etc) and a much better and more professional leader than him.
You say he’s a generalist but usually that means the person is no more than 6/10 in the categories they’re competent at. KDB is an 8-9/10 in all those areas you listed. He’s just a very complete midfielder. I’d take his prime over Ozil no doubt (who can only work in a specific system/position).
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,156
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
You say he’s a generalist but usually that means the person is no more than 6/10 in the categories they’re competent at. KDB is an 8-9/10 in all those areas you listed. He’s just a very complete midfielder. I’d take his prime over Ozil no doubt (who can only work in a specific system/position).
Yes, I agree with that. Özil is somebody who has to be used in a very specific way and if he does, he's excellent. Unfortunately he never transitioned to the modern kind of football and never really worked on his weaknesses. Özil is probably a 10/10 in passing, a 8/10 in dribbling while de Bruyne is a 9/10 and a 7/10 in dribbling and comfortably beats Özil in every other regard. So you would need to deploy Özil in a role that makes incredibly much out of these strengthes for him to be better than de Bruyne.

But I still think Özil's prime is somewhat underrated because of him dropping several levels later on. He was unplayable for a considerably long time.
 

UweBein

Creator of the Worst Analogy on the Internet.
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
3,729
Location
Köln
Supports
Chelsea
Yes, I agree with that. Özil is somebody who has to be used in a very specific way and if he does, he's excellent. Unfortunately he never transitioned to the modern kind of football and never really worked on his weaknesses. Özil is probably a 10/10 in passing, a 8/10 in dribbling while de Bruyne is a 9/10 and a 7/10 in dribbling and comfortably beats Özil in every other regard. So you would need to deploy Özil in a role that makes incredibly much out of these strengthes for him to be better than de Bruyne.

But I still think Özil's prime is somewhat underrated because of him dropping several levels later on. He was unplayable for a considerably long time.
True, but Kevin did it for Bremen and Wolfsburg as well. And is brilliant now. That is very hard to overestimate.
 

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,967
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
True, but Kevin did it for Bremen and Wolfsburg as well. And is brilliant now. That is very hard to overestimate.
Ozil was brilliant for Bremen as well, won the DFB Pokal like KdB, not to forget that. He had an amazing couple of seasons before he left for Madrid.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,094
Not sure why Pep rested him today. man is he ever good. Just imagine how good he'd be if he wasn't fat
He was rushed back to fitness by Belgium at the WC where I think he got injured in again iirc

He’s just constantly been injured since about 2018. Can’t remember the last time he’s had a complete season fully fit
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
11,994
Supports
Man City
Not sure why Pep rested him today. man is he ever good. Just imagine how good he'd be if he wasn't fat
Injured wasn't even supposed to be in the squad for today. You could see at the end when he lost possession he wasn't even able to run back.
 

GMok

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Messages
221
Location
The Good Place
Supports
ATK Mohun Bagan FC
Brilliant player, the best creative midfielder in the league, but it's a huge gamble rushing him back. His game depends on movement and running, so these injuries could easily cut his career short though.
 

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,447
By far the worst player on the pitch, looks half drunk.

Worst I've seen him play.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,337
Yeah, he can pull incredible passes out of nothing but he's goes missing for long periods of a season. Foden and Silva have made him look daft today.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,849
He has games like this regularly just like other high risk playmakers, but somehow it sticks to others in a way it never sticks to him. There’s always an excuse that’s readily accepted for him that would be considered ridiculous for others.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,421
Woeful attempt with the header, and doesn't look on it at all today.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,118
He has games like this regularly just like other high risk playmakers, but somehow it sticks to others in a way it never sticks to him. There’s always an excuse that’s readily accepted for him that would be considered ridiculous for others.
I guess because his team wins so much even when he's having an off-day, it never warrants enough attention
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,431
He hasn't been playing well for a while now.

edit: he started to play much better after Grealish was subbed.
 
Last edited:

jakko

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
577
Supports
Chelsea
Brilliant finish for his goal but poor aside from that. He looked ready to keel over with fatigue when he messed up that attack at the end. Seems to be struggling for fitness.
It took a huge deflection, and he wasn't particularly great last season either.