I do not want INEOS and Ratcliffe as a owner yes cause they do not have a clue what they are doing but even so, i do know that they wouldnt buy Weghorst unless Ten Hag asked. I do know though that with INEOS we are going back to mediocrity like under the Glazers so there will be alot of sarcasm and irony aimed at INEOS from me on this forum.
Because Qatar does? Let me answer that for you : no they do not. They just screw up with more money.
Well atleast they win Ligue 1. What have Lausanne and Nice won under them?
He's technically good and a good dribbler. This, allied with his extreme physical gifts makes him a great player. No one said he's as complete or as technically good as Messi, although he is arguably a better player than Messi now because Messi, physically, is diminished.
He’s inferior to Messi and peak Neymar. That’s hardly a slight though considering neither of those two are at their peak anymore and no one comes close to that level currently.
Not sure this is true
No perhaps not. I’d probably choose Mbappe, but I can certainly see an argument for Neymar. He was also sensational at Barca for afew years.
Agree with this to some extent. Technically, he hasn't really improved since the PSG move and is a bit loose with the ball compared to really great players. However, he's not exactly Emile Heskey with the ball and his physical attributes still make him a devastating player and probably the best in the world currently alongside Haaland, who is even more of a one trick pony. I'd love him at United and I think he would destroy this league, if his ego would allow him to adapt his game.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He literally said he'd be there next year.
I feel like Henry said he wasn't leaving arsenal and the very next day agreed a deal with Barca. Things change.
Why would PSG entertain this ? They'd be better off slashing his price and get 100M from Madrid. Mbappe in the EL would be funny though
He's not wasting a season in the Europa League.
If he does move to Liverpool, he'll play in the league only, perhaps showing up in the EL in the last stages if they make it. Big signing for them, would make them favourites along with City for the title if it happens.
He's not going to Liverpool.
Aside from the fact it makes no sense for PSG to agree to this (without a ludicrous loan fee that Liverpool would never pay), I can't see Klopp signing a player and agreeing that he won't play in certain competitions.
Can you even loan someone out when the contract is ending? In Germany you can’t.
You can in England (Chelsea have done it), not sure about France though.
Thanks mate.
I'm sure Klopp wouldn't say no to such a player, but he would have to adjust his playstyle, Mbappe is the laziest attacker around, he works less off the ball than 35 year old Messi.
And it's the opposite of Mbappé's attitude up until this point. Mbappé is the type of player that doesn't like to be rested, all his coaches have had to convince him that it was best for everyone.
English cities names are getting wilder.
Anything to actually say? It's no secret players like Klopp and want to work with him. And Liverpool will think with their fans and cult like following, they'll be able to convince him to stay. I don't think they will, I think they'll think they can.
