Heinzesight
Full Member
Bring on the Weapon Amad Destruction.
Less 'not aged well' more plain wrong.This aged well...
Not likely, we have used all our subs.I still think Ole hasn’t been vindicated by some of these tactical changes. But happy we’re winning.
I’m also happy that Diallo may get a few minutes near the end of this game.
Who wants McTominay at CB? Madness.How can people want him at CB when he's our only CM who scores regularly
Football einsteinsThis aged well...
although mourinho deserves credit for bringing him in, he was used purely for his height and presence. Not given any freedom at all, so it was difficult to see what talent he has. Ole has done an exceptional job with himCan’t believe how much my opinion has changed on Scotty since his days as Mourinho’s pawn. Love the guy now.
What about the challenge from Shaw to win the ball that set the whole move on its way.Classy direct play from Rashford and McTominay
What about the concussion sub? West Ham confirmed their halftime substitution (Diop) was a concussion sub, so don't we get an extra one too?I think he might be reading the nine subs on the bench thing and getting a bit confused
https://www.thefa.com/news/2020/dec/29/new-rules-in-emirates-fa-cup-third-round-20202912
We can make 5 and an extra one in extra time though so we do have 1 left
let’s hope the defence don’t treat us to a comedy feck upWas that, a goal? Surely not, they've spoiled us here!
no. Completely disagree.Feels unnecessary.
If teams can’t be separated after 90 minutes, why give them an extra half an hour? Settle in with penalties and move on.
Admins: This is not a rude comment.Waste by Martial sadly, great opening.
So he should stop thinking.Second match in a row Rashford sees the ball that’s there for for him to play, goes for it decisively without overthinking and grabs a gorgeous assist.
What seemed absurd was Diop continuing to HT and only then they made a concussion sub? What’s the statute of limitations on that?I first thought he was being ridiculous.
Then thought about the concussion rule. Presumably there's no limit on how many subs you can make for that!?
Admins: This is not a rude comment.
I think 5 during the 90, then you get an extra one if it goes to extra time. Can probably name 9 subs...Can anyone settle our argument over how many subs are allowed going into extra time? I am not arguing... I haven't a clue. But my son is saying it is a maximum of nine subs. REally?
Only 2 concussion subs per game allowedI first thought he was being ridiculous.
Then thought about the concussion rule. Presumably there's no limit on how many subs you can make for that!?
He's definitely better when he has to almost instantly react, the more he has time to think about things the more he gets himself in a mess. He almost does better the harder something isWell done Rashford...again, instinctive with less time to feck about with it.
Problem is, our other CB options are pish so we’ve got no choiceScotland will have to stop playing him at CB, he is a goal machine.
McT does what he is told... and he is much more effective box-to-box . It annoys me that Scotland see him as a defender, because he has more to his game than that. He just improves with age.McT is as important as Bruno, he needs to play as a box to box
Oh dear.Problem is, our other CB options are pish so we’ve got no choice
I don't believe it's 9Can anyone settle our argument over how many subs are allowed going into extra time? I am not arguing... I haven't a clue. But my son is saying it is a maximum of nine subs. REally?
Paul Tierney