Bye. Had high hopes for him but he turned into turd. Sell while the value is high enough.
Marcus Rashford - Linked to PSG
- Thread starter saik
- Start date
No way should we be selling Rashford now, but also no way we should be giving him a new deal now either.
City didn’t hesitate to offload Sterling - they got money and reinvested. We should do the same
So with two years left you just confirmed he needs to go.
How do you view loyalty?
Can’t imagine a worse time to sell Rashford actually. Are you guys out of your mind?
We’re so thin upfront this season it’s depressing.
Cavani and Greenwood out. Martial injured. Ronaldo on the way out. And now everyone wants Rashford out aswell. And we all know with Uniteds transfer strategy that the replacement Will be underwhelming to say the least.
Morata, Icardi, Shaqiri, some PL improven player from Erevidisie.
Its a big no for me this summer. In the future? Well maybe.
We’re so thin upfront this season it’s depressing.
Cavani and Greenwood out. Martial injured. Ronaldo on the way out. And now everyone wants Rashford out aswell. And we all know with Uniteds transfer strategy that the replacement Will be underwhelming to say the least.
Morata, Icardi, Shaqiri, some PL improven player from Erevidisie.
Its a big no for me this summer. In the future? Well maybe.
I agree. His stock is at an all time low. Rashford needs to put his head down and play well to earn a new deal.
One of the funniest rumours. It’s obvious Rashford’s camp is angling for a new contract and hence the PSG links. He can go to PSG or to Liverpool or City for all I care. He’s been rubbish and hasn’t improved a jot. If he isn’t careful he is going to end up at Everton in a few years time.
So you want to give him a new contract?
Our best play is to make our decision this summer, either sell or renew.
He’s on €150k now right? Well, he can get 250 for all that I care. And I’d say sell in two years if he dont improve.
We're not in a strong postion the replace him properly in this window.
We may just share his minutes between Amad and Garnacho. At the very worst case the output would be the same, under all other scenarios more goals will be actually scored (let alone positive effect for player development)
There was huge hype around Rashford on the caf. Personally found him decent but never outstanding or capable of being so.
I would move him on. United need to move out alot of dead wood and bring in players that are capable of playing modern technical and pressing football.
I would move him on. United need to move out alot of dead wood and bring in players that are capable of playing modern technical and pressing football.
But this won't happen.
Paying massive wages restricts how much we can sell for
Why? If Rashford leaves and no replacement is purchased, that’s what will happen.
They didn't mind selling him because they're stocked with talented and productive forwards and had just signed two new ones who have already hit the ground running. We're not close to having that luxury
But we have a luxurious experience of letting overpaid underperformers leaving on a free all the time. Club needs to learn to sell before all value is lost
Fantastic opportuinity to give him an undersevered contract extension and claim as some sort of moral victory for Manchester United. Yaaaay
So psg have
Messi
Mbappe
Neymar
Ekitke
Iccardi
Draxler
Sarabia
And we are seriously supposed to think they want to splash a bunch of cash on rashford.
Riiiiiight
Messi
Mbappe
Neymar
Ekitke
Iccardi
Draxler
Sarabia
And we are seriously supposed to think they want to splash a bunch of cash on rashford.
Riiiiiight
Two years ago before this dreadful slump in form yes, but now he mostly gets abuse.
I find this to be hilarious and am all for it. This is the stuff we need because it shows who makes the hard decisions and who is willing to stand for what is important and right for the club.
Garnacho is 18 and Elanga isn’t good enough. Rashford isn’t good enough either, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t buy someone who is.
Does PSG have a B team cuz he isn’t cracking that 11
Exactly and why shouldn't there be. It was super exciting and much more promising. Dude knocked out PSG like that and then we got to see Neymar on the sideline!
He is getting abuse, but he also has to meet greater expectations and pressure. Focusing on the football side about pressure, expectations, etc is fine. Not everyone is fit and proper for it, especially when he's expected to perform so much better and for a club like United who are trying to win big things again, it's fair to question if he is good enough.
He offers nothing on the pitch.
He's a liability.
Sell him and replace him.
There is time
They're actively looking to offload the bottom 3
Perfect time to replace him. He's not long term solution for left wing anyway, and we're just beginning rebuild.
Doubt this is true. But regardless we won’t sell him although we should.
Jokes on Rashford, he doesn't have to create interest from PSG to get a contract, we give them out always as the club see players as assets.
Make no difference if he stays. Contract running out next year. Get rid.
But it's United. The board will bite it and give him big fat contract until 2030
But it's United. The board will bite it and give him big fat contract until 2030
Not Sarabia.
The club needs a massive rest when it comes to anything football related. We've seen it with Murtough, the release of Judge, the top two recruitment scouts, youth/academy system coaches, and now the first team setup.
It is high time for the players in and out to make that step. High wages and the wage structure must be reset. Moving forward, top players can only earn 200K+ GBP. Sancho, Varane, and Martial are lucky.
Ronaldo and DDG are next in terms of getting massive wages gone or significantly reduced if they stay (DDG).
It is high time for the players in and out to make that step. High wages and the wage structure must be reset. Moving forward, top players can only earn 200K+ GBP. Sancho, Varane, and Martial are lucky.
Ronaldo and DDG are next in terms of getting massive wages gone or significantly reduced if they stay (DDG).
Isn't Mbappe PSG's striker?
Messi-Mbappe-Neymar
So Rashford would be back up?
Messi-Mbappe-Neymar
So Rashford would be back up?
We aren’t generally, problem here is he was on huge wages and then sucked for 2 years so renewing now would be dumb (and he isn’t taking less either )
His stock will only go lower though with the garbage he serves up week in and week out. Let it go on for another year and you end up with another deadwood situation where you can’t sell him at all
Think it would be a Neymar replacement
Neymar's going to leave right before the World Cup in Qatar?