I'm not playing games. I'm disagreeing with you that claiming her sexual past makes Greenwood less likely to be guilty is a good point, I'm describing how you act when pressed on something concrete, and I'm describing your tone policing. You're right, your posts are here for everyone to see, including me.
Ok so you're going to prove the guy right, even though I suggested you all move on? I can't stand posters that repeatedly misrepresent what people say (to the extent of falsification), you need to take a good hard look at yourself. Do you not think this turns people off even though you and others have very valid points?
The guy made a long list, and was called out on the worst of it. A discussion spawned about those things, like him claiming that her sexual past and who she is friends with makes Greenwood less likely to be guilty. In the midst of that disagreement, you pop in to say that he's making good points.
You're a bit weird..... I think you should ignore me from now on.
Again it goes back to the fact that there is a report function and mods. Far, far more people debated his points than attacking him.
It would have been much much worse if he'd returned for United, there were already chants even when he wasn't playing - would have been another unnecessary distraction for the rest of the players
Slow down, Adolf
Can always rely on you for the most extremist take on things - consistent if nothing else !
TBF if anyone has bought a Getafe shirt just due to this loan, a ban is probably fair
Stalin is more apt
Super bad. Seriously, you're bang out of order the way you talk about other posters.
No I’m not - I’ve called them exactly right and they don’t like it.
You're saying people with a different opinion than yours should be banned from the forum. I don't particularly want or need Greenwood back but that is an absurd take.
Wrong thread ?
Your opinion. You're not the boss of this forum - thank heavens!
My badWrong thread ?
This forum allows vile opinions. You're allowed to be racist or homophobic or misogynistic. Basically talk like a racist politician and you'll get fans and following on here. Just don't promote it.
Thats quite the claim. Care to show evidence of posts allowing such things that went unpunished? I have never seen any of that on here
Show me examples please?
The rules of the forum. The link is at the bottom.
Sorry I just checked them. Where does it say people are allowed to be racist and misogynistic?
Read between the lines. It's not allowed to promote it but people talk that way here in plenty of threads. This thread is full of people that have been defending the violence towards women being OK under the guise of a failure of a justice system not prosecuting.
You're not allowed to promote it. You don't have to promote misogyny for you being a misogynist.
Well that’s just the wording. We certainly ban anyone who is outright racist or makes comments deemed unacceptable. It is very hard to make a judgement call on whether someone is or isn’t something based on their posts on a forum (some are sneaky and tread the fine line), but we do our best. Please report anything you see that has gone unnoticed/unchallenged.
It's not just the wording, it's the rules. The rules you adhere to when making decisions on if you should give warnings or bans. You have to absolutely lose your shit to get a ban on here. Most pieces of shit on the internet aren't blatant in their views becusse they know they go against the masses. Therefor they speak more subtly like "Courts didn't find Greenwood guilty and therefor he's innocent". That's just another way of saying "I don't care what he did, I still want him to play with us" which is just an acceptable way of condoning violence.
Come on, mate.
What has been the view of this issue among United supporters you know in Hong Kong ?
Not that I want Greenwood back, but..... I forgot how it feels to live in an autocratic regime? I thought I will never witness it ever again.
What the absolute feck do you mean? It’s a message board I want to have a level of quality to it - not a political statement.
TBH, from our local fan online forums or facebook pages, most are like:
Excellent.
Seems weird that this is just a footnote in a story about the Ratcliffe saga. Wouldn't this have been a bigger story if it were coming from the club?
Yeah I thought that too. Could easily have had its own article.
Good. We have an answer, whether people like it or not, and can move on now.
Better to just bury it in the many other United stories at the moment. Whatever side of the fence people are on re his playing for United again, I think everyone can agree he doesn't need even more headlines about him.
