Why does she have to have a "need" that you approve of? She is a United fan and even if she wasn't she is entitled to an opinion. Doubly so when it is such a reasonable opinion.
Holding the club to ransom? Really? Get a grip.
And it is great to see some bloke from the internet telling women what they are and aren't allowed to do or how they are allowed protest. I'm guessing you don't see the inherent misogyny and irony in such a statement?
I am not saying that women are not allowed to protest. I am saying that she should use her platform to highlight the issue with organisations that work with these issues on a day to day basis. That would be getting to the root of the issue and do more good in the long term. There also seems to be an aspect of her delivering opinions online with various topics, in the acknowledgement she knows she is going exposure for it. The typical trend for Internet.
I much prefer it if people who engaged with social issues on a consistent basis which could lead to prominent change.
And seen as you have referred to me as "some bloke" from the Internet, I have seen a lot of mental health issues, leading to domestic violence within the home. Fortunately, with a lot of determination, hard work and hurt we got to the I say it again got to the "root of the issue".
My opinion was/is that if the club found that Mason Greenwood was not culpable or that there were extenuating circumstances or a wider picture to those incidents, that the club should have undertaken a rehabilitation process and got the support he needed to allow this never to happen again.
I do not think it is fair to just disregard someone who is still at a very young age and just make him someone else's problem. I did not do that with a member of my family, because I could not and would not. Manchester United is far more powerful and has much more access to support networks then what I ever could.