Fair enough, I agree with some of that. I agree that McTominay has been a beneficiary of circumstances. I don’t agree that LVG brought through a load of promising players necessarily. It wasn’t really a great generation of youth players for us. The likes of Weir and Love were never going to be PL players let alone United ones. I do credit him though as he gave the likes of Wilson a proper go.
I also don’t agree that he ‘deserves his chance in a settled team’. Greenwood ‘deserves’ a chance at United. If Scott deserves a chance, then I believe every kid is entitled to feel they should ‘have a run of games in a settled United team to say if they can eventually mature into a good squad player’. And the truth is, if given a lot of games in a successful United team, any of our kids could probably be useful squad players. But usually only the Greenwoods, Tuanzebes and Gomes’ get that chance, and they may all end up as squad players, but the hope is they all become world class. I don’t think Scott McTominay is anymore ‘deserving’ of a run in our first team than Callum Whelan, and less so than say, Ethan Hamilton, who will never get that run of games, as he’s probably not good enough, and even then, he’s more talented than Scott. This is why I think McTominay is one of the luckiest players in the game. He’ll end up being a Manchester United player for years when he could just have easily have been a Derby County player without much conversation about it.
Anyway, I’ve said enough on the topic. I have no ‘hate’ for him. I’m just genuinely baffled. Perhaps all will be revealed in time. But he’s almost been treated similarly to Marcus Rashford since he’s come into the first team squad. He’s been given two 5 year deals in 2 years, and played 40-odd games. The type of treatment I’d have thought would be reserved for our most special only, not to ‘develop a long term squad player’. It’s unprecedented.