Robbie Boy
Full Member
Especially not for a midfielder
Especially not for a midfielder
You mean talking about signing a player when you already have the best performer in the league for the current season at that position, with still a bunch of years in him?Ah, the United way.
Only arrived there last season so I'd imagine there's still a lot of time left on it.Brilliant keeper - when does his contract end?
This is only his second season at Milan so I'd imagine not for a while. 2/3 years minimum.Brilliant keeper - when does his contract end?
He wasn't a reject, they rated him but he wasn't ready to start in 2015 and left for game time.@JPRouve he's another psg reject, did he look like like a failure then or did they make another blunder?
To think they paid so much for donnoruma who he has replaced and is much superior to is frankly hilarious.
Interesting, I wonder whether they regret letting him go now.He wasn't a reject, they rated him but he wasn't ready to start in 2015 and left for game time.
They didn't had a choice, he wasn't extending to be on the bench. And no, they likely don't regret it, they had Areolas who was better at the time and promising, they also got Donnarumma as a free agent.Interesting, I wonder whether they regret letting him go now.
To be honest I always found him to be painfully average so I don't know what psg saw in him back then.They didn't had a choice, he wasn't extending to be on the bench. And no, they likely don't regret it, they had Areolas who was better at the time and promising, they also got Donnarumma as a free agent.
Donnarumma is excellent and far from average, he is also only 23. And I don't see Deschamps bench his captain when he has been pretty good in the last years.To be honest I always found him to be painfully average so I don't know what psg saw in him back then.
Anyway do you think Deschamps will persist with Lloris for the WC?
They were talking about Areola I think.Donnarumma is excellent and far from average, he is also only 23. And I don't see Deschamps bench his captain when he has been pretty good in the last years.
Yeah Donnarumma is pretty decent although I'd argue he wasn't worth the money they paid for him, still it should set them nicely in that position for years to come.Donnarumma is excellent and far from average, he is also only 23. And I don't see Deschamps bench his captain when he has been pretty good in the last years.
What money are you talking about? Donnarumma was a free agent. They paid a signing bonus but that was far below any transfer fee for that kind of talent.Yeah Donnarumma is pretty decent although I'd argue he wasn't worth the money they paid for him, still it should set them nicely in that position for years to come.
Anyway thanks for answering mate.
NipplesThey were talking about Areola I think.
You are right, he seemingly was. But even then it makes little sense Areola was good in 2015 and definitely better than Maignan, for Lille he only became a starter in 2017. Even if PSG were to upgrade on Areola it would have been someone else than Maignan.They were talking about Areola I think.
Yeah you're right, I had an aneurysm and thought they paid 70 mill for him which was actually the money they paid for hakimi, my bad.What money are you talking about? Donnarumma was a free agent. They paid a signing bonus but that was far below any transfer fee for that kind of talent.
I just don't think they've made the best decisions in that regard, I didn't rate areola at all before which they had gotten trapp which didn't work out then they got a geriatric buffon which ended up as expected, thought they did the right thing by snatching navas but they then immediately unsettled him by getting Donnarumma so never really understood what the planning was.You are right, he seemingly was. But even then it makes little sense Areola was good in 2015 and definitely better than Maignan, for Lille he only became a starter in 2017. Even if PSG were to upgrade on Areola it would have been someone else than Maignan.
Milan lost Donnaruma for free because they refused to alter their wage structure when he had one year left. I can understand letting Kessié and Çalha run out their contracts. But Donna was very young and risk-free. They could have had a great fee for him after the Euros if he was on a contract. And they would still have been able to recruit Maignan on a good deal all the same.Yeah you're right, I had an aneurysm and thought they paid 70 mill for him which was actually the money they paid for hakimi, my bad.
All in all milan probably got the best deal with them paying maignan much less than what donaruumma was asking, Donnarumma did have that unfortunate moment in the cl last season so let's see how he kicks on this year.
But weren't they in a really tight situation back then financially? Them not budging on their position perhaps the right decision in the long run.Milan lost Donnaruma for free because they refused to alter their wage structure when he had one year left. I can understand letting Kessié and Çalha run out their contracts. But Donna was very young and risk-free. They could have had a great fee for him after the Euros if he was on a contract. And they would still have been able to recruit Maignan on a good deal all the same.
Trapp was brought to replace-compete with Sirigu not Areola. Areola was doing very well between 15-17 for Bastia and then Villarreal while Maignan was mainly playing in CFA for Lille or on the bench. Then Areola did well during his first season for PSG and was then put in a bogus competition with Buffon, then PSG brought Navas who was better than all the goalkeepers mentioned in this post and now they have Donnarumma.I just don't think they've made the best decisions in that regard, I didn't rate areola at all before which they had got trapp which didn't work at then they got a geriatric buffon which ended up as expected, thought they did the right thing by snatching navas but they then immediate unsettled him by getting Donnarumma so never really understood what the planning was.
He has 3 years left on his contract. I'd say they would probably be looking for 70M? Allison and Kepa have gone for that sort of fee and they would be looking for similar.Very impressed with him tonight even if he had little to do, has impressed me every time I've seen him, exudes confidence and looks at least competent with the ball in his feet. Realistically how much are we talking to bring him to replace De Gea? especially if Milan fail to qualify for the CL.
He's only had trouble this year with a freak fracture to the hand then another unrelated injury on his way backHe's quite injury prone no?
He is a little bit older than Allison and kepa when they moved so maybe that can knock 10 million off the price? Either way doubt he'll be cheap. Even in that little scuffle with Richarlison, he handled it so well, like i said just exudes leadership whenever I've seen him.He has 3 years left on his contract. I'd say they would probably be looking for 70M? Allison and Kepa have gone for that sort of fee and they would be looking for similar.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date