Mjld

[Burndogg]

fecking suck up...

 

[Wibble]

Not sucking up here at all but I personally welcome this move. Even the United forum needs a bit of a clean-up in my eyes. Nearly every thread has become a bit of a cliche recently. If it hasn't been done before then it gets filed under a certain category (Player vs. Player, Over/Underrated, Pro/Anti-Glazer, Top Red/OOT, etc) and gets responded to as such. Anything genuinely new either gets lost amongst the chaos, morphed into something old, turned into a random discussion or (in some rare cases) actual intelligent football discussion.

I'm interested though, how heavily is the banstick going to come though? Will it be (a) major cull(s) before Christmas or a slow and steady banning process?

Slow and steady by infraction. If people behave it won't happen. if they continue not to there will be eGenocide by the time the festive season rolls on by.

 

[jveezy]

What are we arguing about now exactly?

 

[Sultan]

What are we arguing about now exactly?

Haven't the foggiest

The truth is MJLD asked for a ban.

 

[RK]

...with his constant disregard for warnings and insulting moderators?

 

[Collina]

Haven't the foggiest

The truth is MJLD asked for a ban.

He sent you a PM where he asked for a ban?

 

[Sultan]

...with his constant disregard for warnings and insulting moderators?

Checked his posts. No insults from MJLD towards any mods.

I'm fighting MJ's corner in the mod forum. The problem is I can't do much because he literally asked to be banned.

 

[Sultan]

He sent you a PM where he asked for a ban?

No

 

[Biscuit1871]

Temp or Perm, Sultan?

 

[711]

I reckon when it comes to banning it should take two mods with two keys that they insert simultaneously like what you'd do in a nuclear submarine to launch world war three.

And I imagine the phrase 'insert simultaneously' is not entirely new to the average mod.

 

[jveezy]

Haven't the foggiest

The truth is MJLD asked for a ban.

See?!! I feckin told you guys that pages ago.

 

[Hectic]

Haven't the foggiest

The truth is MJLD asked for a ban.

 

[RK]

Checked his posts. No insults from MJLD towards any mods.

I'm fighting MJ's corner in the mod forum. The problem is I can't do much because he literally asked to be banned.

Heh, this is too confusing for me.

And for that reason, I'm out.

 

[Ole's_toe_poke]

Checked his posts. No insults from MJLD towards any mods.

I'm fighting MJ's corner in the mod forum. The problem is I can't do much because he literally asked to be banned.

Is there a war going on in there? We need names. Who is in whose corner?

 

[Dr. Dwayne]

The rules are clear, but the enforcement of them isn't.

We aren't robots. At least..not yet.

Maybe it'd be fair if we made that sub-forum visible to everyone?

 

[Wibble]

I'd say that calling Eyepopper "a bog trotting fenian nacker" by PM constituted "asking for a ban".

 

[Flying Fox]

No, it's an oligarchy and therefore receives the same criticism that any oligarchy does. It's inevitable and unavoidable.

A point well made.

 

[jveezy]

I'm still not sure whose side I'm on.

 

[A grade]

A fun lad. Shame. I have a feeling he may be back soon under a different username...

 

[iSparky]

whats going on in here now then? are we still talking about jldm?

 

[Burndogg]

I'd say that calling Eyepopper "a bog trotting fenian nacker" by PM constituted "asking for a ban".

that constitutes an avatar

 

[datura]

We aren't robots. At least..not yet.

Maybe it'd be fair if we made that sub-forum visible to everyone?

That wasn't the point, it was a reply in reference to a Broph's post. I actually haven't criticised the moderation at all yet you are the 2nd person picking on this comment out of context.

 

[Uncle Junior]

The rules are clear, but the enforcement of them isn't.

The mods here do a good job, and therefore you should not question their actions or tell them how to do their work. They take time out and do the moderation only to make this place better, and you should be grateful for that, not condescending.

 

[datura]

The mods here do a good job, and therefore you should not question their actions or tell them how to do their work. They take time out and do the moderation only to make this place better, and you should be grateful for that, not condescending.

Poor wum attempt.

 

[jveezy]

That wasn't the point, it was a reply in reference to a Broph's post. I actually haven't criticised the moderation at all yet you are the 2nd person picking on this comment out of context.

Tbf this entire thread is out of context.

I don't even know what that means. It's late.

 

[Big-Red]

I'm more interested in whether CZ will ever be back?

 

[AgainstAllOdds]

Because it always ends up in criticism of mods/admins who never act impulsively. They deserve better IMO.

I am actually in favour of giving 2 day bans to anyone who even vaguely questions a mod/admins action on anything. This place is becoming chaotic due to this sort of anarchy.

5 pages?

So I guess that thing about us explaining bannings not leading to endless debate is true.

He's gone, get over it, you wont remember who he was in 2 days!

Sellout. 24 Hours to go.

 

[Sassy Colin]

Next time they step out of line they will. We aim to significantly reduce the membership before Christmas.

Slow and steady by infraction. If people behave it won't happen. if they continue not to there will be eGenocide by the time the festive season rolls on by.

And there was I thinking that Red Cafe was for life not just for Xmas...

Checked his posts. No insults from MJLD towards any mods.

I'm fighting MJ's corner in the mod forum. The problem is I can't do much because he literally asked to be banned.

This guys too nice to be a mod...

I'd say that calling Eyepopper "a bog trotting fenian nacker" by PM constituted "asking for a ban".

I had to look that up in a dictionary, I can see how certain nationalities might be offened by that...

 

[EricaNo7]

And there was I thinking that Red Cafe was for life not just for Xmas...

very good, colin

 

[Boss]

Mods, I have an interesting proposition

can we swap Uncle Junior with MJLD's place?

think about it

 

[Dr. Dwayne]

That wasn't the point, it was a reply in reference to a Broph's post. I actually haven't criticised the moderation at all yet you are the 2nd person picking on this comment out of context.

Brophs said that the rules were clear; you agreed and said that the enforcement wasn't.

Yet somehow two posters have missed the point entirely, what gives?

 

[brewlio]

can we swap Uncle Junior with MJLD's place?

:spunklejunior:

 

[Dr. Dwayne]

Mods, I have an interesting proposition

can we swap Uncle Junior with MJLD's place?

think about it

How about I have sex with your wife for 1 million dollars?

.
.
.

Wait, wrong scenario. Carry on.

 

[Dr. Dwayne]

:spunklejunior:

:boilio:

 

[iSparky]

Mods, I have an interesting proposition

can we swap Uncle Junior with MJLD's place?

think about it

you are my new favourite poster

 

[Mighty Boosh]

I'm more interested in whether CZ will ever be back?

Ye was just thinking I hadn't seen him around in a while, why was he banned ?

 

[Boss]

:spunklejunior:

he irks me

name one good attribute about him

I've got all day

 

[Uncle Junior]

Mods, I have an interesting proposition

can we swap Uncle Junior with MJLD's place?

think about it

Is it because of that ridiculous "Nani is the hero Portugal needs!" thread that you made?

 

[Karel_Poborsky]

Lets all just be friends... the Christmas orgy will be better then.

 

[brewlio]

name one good attribute about him

He's alright man. A touch condescending and vain, but he's getting there. In fact he's growing on me like a servatius cyst.