g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Film Mulholland Drive

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,881
Location
The Zone
I haven’t yet. Monday perhaps as football on all weekend. Is it one of those films you need to be in the right mood/setting for would you say mate?
Oh yeah for sure, it’s one of those film where you need to be in the right setting(And definitely do not watch it on a iPhone!)
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,881
Location
The Zone
I’ve downloaded it on film 4!

What setting is best?
Nice!

Thee only advice I would give is just go with the flow of the film, which sounds kind of silly but it’s far less structured than Blue Velvet or Twin Peaks season one.

I came away just as confused as when I started watching but in a good way. It fits Lynch own quote perfectly -

“I don't know why people expect art to make sense. They accept the fact that life doesn't make sense.”

I found watching it the first time to be more of a experience than anything else.

Enjoy!
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,488
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
There's nothing particularly complicated about Mulholland Drive. It's the process of psychic automatism in its pure state, by which Lynch proposes to express—visually, by means of the cinema—the actual functioning of thought. Dictated by thought, it lends to the absence of any control exercised by reason, exempt from any aesthetic or moral concern. Then the credits roll.
 

Twins

"Everybody loves a golden shower"
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
5,694
There's nothing particularly complicated about Mulholland Drive. It's the process of psychic automatism in its pure state, by which Lynch proposes to express—visually, by means of the cinema—the actual functioning of thought. Dictated by thought, it lends to the absence of any control exercised by reason, exempt from any aesthetic or moral concern. Then the credits roll.
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,157
Weird to see this thread bumped as I rewatched this over Christmas. It’s a great movie. Like most David Lynch movies, it definitely requires more than one watch to understand what’s going on and appreciate more parts of it. Naomi Watts is great in this movie. Lynch goes from creepy to funny so seemlessly.

Best way to probably explain this movie to someone is the first two thirds of the movie is you’re watching a certain characters dream, and the last third is what its really like. The weird stuff you see in the ‘Dream’ part is just that… it’s weird dream stuff and it’s more of an idea within the certain character‘s mind or their interpretations (the old couple at the start of the movie, the hitman etc)

Lynch is pretty cool guy. He makes the most creepy, unsettling movies that aren’t Horror but he’s a wholesome eccentric in reality. I always thought Coop from Twin Peaks was kinda his self insert into Twin Peaks.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,346
Watched this last night without knowing anything about it (had a vague idea it might be something along lines of Usual Suspects).

Will have to think and read up on it for a while obviously, but while I was intrigued the entire way through, I don’t think I can say I enjoyed the entire thing.
 

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,357
Weird to see this thread bumped as I rewatched this over Christmas. It’s a great movie. Like most David Lynch movies, it definitely requires more than one watch to understand what’s going on and appreciate more parts of it. Naomi Watts is great in this movie. Lynch goes from creepy to funny so seemlessly.

Best way to probably explain this movie to someone is the first two thirds of the movie is you’re watching a certain characters dream, and the last third is what its really like. The weird stuff you see in the ‘Dream’ part is just that… it’s weird dream stuff and it’s more of an idea within the certain character‘s mind or their interpretations (the old couple at the start of the movie, the hitman etc)

Lynch is pretty cool guy. He makes the most creepy, unsettling movies that aren’t Horror but he’s a wholesome eccentric in reality. I always thought Coop from Twin Peaks was kinda his self insert into Twin Peaks.
I saw it a bit differently from that, but overall it was similar. I think that's one of the things about the movie which makes it great though as it can be interpreted in different ways and they all make sense.

I took the very last sequence to be reality, with the entire movie being the consciousness of somebody dying with the first two-thirds being how their life would ideally have been (with inserts of the reality creeping in) and then slowly moving more into how it was as they approached death
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Lynch is the best film maker ever, in history, of all fecking time, of that there is no doubt.

Mulholland Drive is a mere snapshot of a portfolio of work which incorporates some of the best surrealist art ever put to celluloid.

A film that transcends what we deem to be real and what we perceive to be a dream.
 

Member 125398

Guest
Lynch is the best film maker ever, in history, of all fecking time, of that there is no doubt.

Mulholland Drive is a mere snapshot of a portfolio of work which incorporates some of the best surrealist art ever put to celluloid.

A film that transcends what we deem to be real and what we perceive to be a dream.
And boobies:cool:
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,881
Location
The Zone
Lynch is the best film maker ever, in history, of all fecking time, of that there is no doubt.

Mulholland Drive is a mere snapshot of a portfolio of work which incorporates some of the best surrealist art ever put to celluloid.

A film that transcends what we deem to be real and what we perceive to be a dream.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,488
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
Lynch is the best film maker ever, in history, of all fecking time, of that there is no doubt.

Mulholland Drive is a mere snapshot of a portfolio of work which incorporates some of the best surrealist art ever put to celluloid.

A film that transcends what we deem to be real and what we perceive to be a dream.
Speaking of which, I think Andre Breton's surrealist manifesto is possibly the best explanation of any of Lynch's work. I don't expect anyone to actually read it but it sort of outlines all of the unconscious ways in which we try to make sense of everyday life and how regularly out of order and chaotic these thoughts can be, particularly in terms of dreams. Lynch's work seems to me to be underpinned by this same thinking: Eraserhead in terms of the fear of family values, Blue Velvet the uncomfortability of suburban life in Middle America, Mulholland Drive with the culture of media/filmmaking, Twin Peaks with the loss of law and order, Inland Empire with whatever the hell that movie was trying to talk about (Rabbits?). Etc.

The fact Lynch hasn't disappeared up his own arse reflects it well because he's displaying quite ordinary modes of thinking we all have and can't put into words. Instead he puts them into visual/performative imagery.

I've also tried to not disappear up my own arse expressing this point so hopefully I haven't :)
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Speaking of which, I think Andre Breton's surrealist manifesto is possibly the best explanation of any of Lynch's work. I don't expect anyone to actually read it but it sort of outlines all of the unconscious ways in which we try to make sense of everyday life and how regularly out of order and chaotic these thoughts can be, particularly in terms of dreams. Lynch's work seems to me to be underpinned by this same thinking: Eraserhead in terms of the fear of family values, Blue Velvet the uncomfortability of suburban life in Middle America, Mulholland Drive with the culture of media/filmmaking, Twin Peaks with the loss of law and order, Inland Empire with whatever the hell that movie was trying to talk about (Rabbits?). Etc.

The fact Lynch hasn't disappeared up his own arse reflects it well because he's displaying quite ordinary modes of thinking we all have and can't put into words. Instead he puts them into visual/performative imagery.

I've also tried to not disappear up my own arse expressing this point so hopefully I haven't :)
Nice, thanks for that. May well give that a look.

Think you've put it very eloquently.

I've read a few books about Lynch and breaking down the puzzles he seems to create, it's all extremely interesting.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,880
Location
The stable
It was the first Lynch film I watched and it's probably the worst way to be introduced to him.

I'd probably have a more favourable opinion of the film now if I were to rewatch it.
 

Salt Bailly

Auburn, not Ginger.
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
9,745
Location
Valinor
:lol:

Whoops! Completely forgot. Funnily enough I was going to tag you today but for a different film. The underrated imo Ryan Gosling film - The Place Beyond The Pines is back on the BBC iplayer.
This was on BBC last night as I was scanning through. That first half is just :drool:
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,507
Location
Manchester
:lol:

Whoops! Completely forgot. Funnily enough I was going to tag you today but for a different film. The underrated imo Ryan Gosling film - The Place Beyond The Pines is back on the BBC iplayer.
oh great! I’ll watch that too, probably weekend . Box them both before they go!!
 

Nickosaur

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
11,896
Anyone seen Inland Empire? Now that's a fecking trip. Features a jump scare that rivals the dream sequence at the start of Mulholland Drive imo.

Having finished The Return, I think that's his masterpiece.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,488
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
/ SPOILER ALERT /

So I watched this again recently and have been thinking about the meaning behind it. I'm fairly sure the whole thing is split into two sections where the last part is reality and the first part is a dream sequence from the perspective of Naomi Watts character. There's a few references to sleep throughout the film, most notably at the end when the Cowboy says "wake up pretty girl" and thereafter the whole thing descends into a horrible realisation for her. Or waking nightmare, if you will.

It feels like Laura Herring's character (also feck me, she's beautiful in this) is this idealised version that Betty dreams up given that she's a more manipulative and scheming character towards the close. It therefore plays like Betty is imagining what life would be like if she were new to Hollywood and met a completely different person – the two of them ending up romantically involved and almost like their two personalities are merging. I also think this is intended to be a reflection of how old Hollywood would idealise female leads because she adopts the name Rita based on the poster she sees of Gilda in the background. Lynch seems to be picking up on the the image of Hollywood as if it were a mystery into its very nature.

The scene at the Silencio becomes an awakening where Betty is shook (literally) into remembering the truth. After this, she picks up the box and it seems like the key she finds is a symbolic reference to opening the door back to reality.

While Lynch obviously intended to keep the film ambiguous, it feels like the whole thing is some kind of 'theatre of the absurd' massacre about Hollywood where rose-tinted views of life in the movies come crashing down under the weight of the industry's nefarious aspects. I read Lynch's biography recently and there's lots in there about studio execs not getting his work and him feeling like an outsider artist who happened to make it big. Dune is probably the most obvious example.

What say you. How did you "read" the film?

It was the first Lynch film I watched and it's probably the worst way to be introduced to him.

I'd probably have a more favourable opinion of the film now if I were to rewatch it.
Old bump but what makes you say this?
 

Red Rash

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
2,219
/ SPOILER ALERT /

So I watched this again recently and have been thinking about the meaning behind it. I'm fairly sure the whole thing is split into two sections where the last part is reality and the first part is a dream sequence from the perspective of Naomi Watts character. There's a few references to sleep throughout the film, most notably at the end when the Cowboy says "wake up pretty girl" and thereafter the whole thing descends into a horrible realisation for her. Or waking nightmare, if you will.

It feels like Laura Herring's character (also feck me, she's beautiful in this) is this idealised version that Betty dreams up given that she's a more manipulative and scheming character towards the close. It therefore plays like Betty is imagining what life would be like if she were new to Hollywood and met a completely different person – the two of them ending up romantically involved and almost like their two personalities are merging. I also think this is intended to be a reflection of how old Hollywood would idealise female leads because she adopts the name Rita based on the poster she sees of Gilda in the background. Lynch seems to be picking up on the the image of Hollywood as if it were a mystery into its very nature.

The scene at the Silencio becomes an awakening where Betty is shook (literally) into remembering the truth. After this, she picks up the box and it seems like the key she finds is a symbolic reference to opening the door back to reality.

While Lynch obviously intended to keep the film ambiguous, it feels like the whole thing is some kind of 'theatre of the absurd' massacre about Hollywood where rose-tinted views of life in the movies come crashing down under the weight of the industry's nefarious aspects. I read Lynch's biography recently and there's lots in there about studio execs not getting his work and him feeling like an outsider artist who happened to make it big. Dune is probably the most obvious example.

What say you. How did you "read" the film?



Old bump but what makes you say this?
Why didn't you just put this in a spoiler?
 

Nickosaur

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
11,896
/ SPOILER ALERT /

So I watched this again recently and have been thinking about the meaning behind it. I'm fairly sure the whole thing is split into two sections where the last part is reality and the first part is a dream sequence from the perspective of Naomi Watts character. There's a few references to sleep throughout the film, most notably at the end when the Cowboy says "wake up pretty girl" and thereafter the whole thing descends into a horrible realisation for her. Or waking nightmare, if you will.

It feels like Laura Herring's character (also feck me, she's beautiful in this) is this idealised version that Betty dreams up given that she's a more manipulative and scheming character towards the close. It therefore plays like Betty is imagining what life would be like if she were new to Hollywood and met a completely different person – the two of them ending up romantically involved and almost like their two personalities are merging. I also think this is intended to be a reflection of how old Hollywood would idealise female leads because she adopts the name Rita based on the poster she sees of Gilda in the background. Lynch seems to be picking up on the the image of Hollywood as if it were a mystery into its very nature.

The scene at the Silencio becomes an awakening where Betty is shook (literally) into remembering the truth. After this, she picks up the box and it seems like the key she finds is a symbolic reference to opening the door back to reality.

While Lynch obviously intended to keep the film ambiguous, it feels like the whole thing is some kind of 'theatre of the absurd' massacre about Hollywood where rose-tinted views of life in the movies come crashing down under the weight of the industry's nefarious aspects. I read Lynch's biography recently and there's lots in there about studio execs not getting his work and him feeling like an outsider artist who happened to make it big. Dune is probably the most obvious example.

What say you. How did you "read" the film?
Reading Lynch on Lynch, he really hates having to explain his art. His mantra is basically, it means whatever it means to you in the moment.

That said your take above I think is the common theory I've encountered online. Not going to say it's something that was clear on first viewing (what the feck were my main thoughts) but on later viewings - yeah I'd subscribe to that.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,794
Location
Cardiff
Watched this for the first time. Goes in the incoherent nonsense category for me.
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,321
Inland Empire is available to rent on google. I must get it some day, though i might split it into two days as its three hours long.

Mulholland Drive is one of the best films ever made.