lem8sh
New Member
I thought that Mulholland Drive was supposed to be some kind of classic? One of the worse movies I have ever seen. Typical David Lynch incoherent bollocks.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
I image that's why it's great.I thought that Mulholland Drive was supposed to be some kind of classic? One of the worse movies I have ever seen. Typical David Lynch incoherent bollocks.
I know but it's one of those movies that I felt I had to watch eventually because of the **** status around it and it's inclusion in many greatest movie lists, just to see the hype around it.I don't know why you watched it if you don't like David Lynch's style of film. Although I think it's probably one of his most accessible.
No thanksI hope you aren't planning on watching Eraserhead next.
But how is this film making "greatest ever" lists?! Even Lynchs biggest fans couldn't like that shite.It's not a film you'll like if you don't like Lynch.
Although seriously, Elephant Man and The Straight Story are great films that aren't typically Lynch-y and I'd recommend to anyone.No thanks
I did like Elephant Man to be fair.Although seriously, Elephant Man and The Straight Story are great films that aren't typically Lynch-y and I'd recommend to anyone.
It is a good film if you are into that kind of thing. I like Lynch, though I'm not one of those who thinks everything he does is genius and if you don't agree, you don't get it.But how is this film making "greatest ever" lists?! Even Lynchs biggest fans couldn't like that shite.
I might watch it again sometime just to give it another chance or to see if I missed the point/plot completely.A film I consider in my top ten greatest of all-time.
David Lynch's 'Mulholland Drive' Explained:Mulholland Dr, the 2001 film by David Lynch, very well reviewed in its time, but of growing authority and reputation.
Why? Essentially, because it is a mystery film that never settles its own mystery. Even its greatest admirers are loathe to explain it or endure it being explained.
Here is a film in which the attitude to the world opts for fatal atmosphere instead of resolution.
Will check this out.The famous film critic David Thomson discusses Mulholland Drive:
David Lynch's 'Mulholland Drive' Explained:
http://www.esquire.co.uk/culture/film/news/a7676/mulholland-drive-explained/
The lezzing is superb it must be said, superb.I was falling asleep in the cinema and then the lezzing started, and I woke up and went 'yes' too loudly that my wife elbowed me indignantly.
Aye, I agree. Which is why it's perfectly fine for some to see the movie/Lynch's style as a grand facade of airy-fairy nonsense, others feast on the ambiguities and the various interpretations available. Especially now on the web.Part of the charm of acclaimed works of fiction is their near-inscrutablility, which gives us the delicious opportunity to try to fathom what the creator is attempting to 'say'. For instance, I've long been fascinated with critics' interpretations of the famous novella Heart of Darkness...more so with the criticism than with the book itself, truth be told.
The lezzing?One of my favourites.
Yeah after watching this interview I get the feeling Lynch isn't trying to too much or anything at all.I often wonder if Lynch gets too much credit for its fuzziness. It was meant to be the pilot for a television show and when ABC rejected it he quickly wrote some pages and filmed them to make it self contained.
Yeah, Blue Velvet would be the classic Lynch film. The perfect movie of accessibility and Lynchian weirdness that I feel was one of those movies that sort of changed cinema when it came out in the sense of having a pioneering feel about it. I don´t think anyone had quite seen anything like it before and were fascinated by it. It´s like anyone from the most mouth breather BSI Miami groupie to the most cynical pretentious kunt film critic could come together and love this film.I thought that Mulholland Drive was supposed to be some kind of classic? One of the worse movies I have ever seen. Typical David Lynch incoherent bollocks.
Tempted to go a see it again in October - https://whatson.bfi.org.uk/lff/Onli...&BOparam::WScontent::loadArticle::context_id=I need to revisit both Mulholland and Blue Velvet soon, loved them when I first saw them but my recollection of them are starting to go a bit fuzzy.
Cool.Yeah, Blue Velvet would be the classic Lynch film. The perfect movie of accessibility and Lynchian weirdness that I feel was one of those movies that sort of changed cinema when it came out in the sense of having a pioneering feel about it. I don´t think anyone had quite seen anything like it before and were fascinated by it. It´s like anyone from the most mouth breather BSI Miami groupie to the most cynical pretentious kunt film critic could come together and love this film.
I had the bizarre experience of watching it in a Colombian theater with a run-of-the-mill conservative, not very intellectual audience, and it got a standing ovation at the end. Never have experienced anything like it. That never happens. Almost as surreal as the movie itself.
Wait what? I have no memory of an angel.Loads of good stuff in blue velvet, but I watched it again a year or two ago and it's not perfect, there is trite shite in there, like the fecking angel.
My favourite "trite" part is where Kyle MacLachlan and Laura Dern are walking on the sidewalk and all of a sudden he starts doing the Chickenwalk. Classic Lynch, and you can be sure the Hollywood suits would´ve cut that scene onetime had they gotten anywhere near that film.Loads of good stuff in blue velvet, but I watched it again a year or two ago and it's not perfect, there is trite shite in there, like the fecking angel.