peterstorey
Specialist In Failure
We won't sell Nasri to you. We'll let him walk next year rather than do that.
So you'd rather him join us for nothing next summer than get £25m out of us?We won't sell Nasri to you. We'll let him walk next year rather than do that.
There was a comparison on Sky between Nasri, Modric and Sneijder.Whats his passing like? Can he do some Scholes' like passing or is he more of a take the ball and run type of player?
Yep because then it'll be a wages war you won't win. I still think we'll get at least a year's extension anywaySo you'd rather him join us for nothing next summer than get £25m out of us?
It'll be a wages war, but your side, with the lowest wage ceiling of anyone in the conversation, will get a year's extension.Yep because then it'll be a wages war you won't win. I still think we'll get at least a year's extension anyway
Fine by me. £0m next year rather than £20m this year seems like a bit of a bargain.We won't sell Nasri to you. We'll let him walk next year rather than do that.
Why would Nasri sign away another year of his career if he wants out? If there is to be an extension it'll be a 4-5 year contract not one year on top of his current one.Yep because then it'll be a wages war you won't win. I still think we'll get at least a year's extension anyway
Thats complete bollocks and more then a little bit hopeful from an Arsenal perspective.We won't sell Nasri to you. We'll let him walk next year rather than do that.
Because he'll get a lot more money for a year?Why would Nasri sign away another year of his career if he wants out?
he'll get a lot more money regardlessBecause he'll get a lot more money for a year?
If his primary goal is money, he'll make as much closing out his current contract with you and playing next year at Citeh as he would in two years at £90K/week with you.Because he'll get a lot more money for a year?
Wenger told that Nasri is desperate to leave Arsenal - Transfers, Football - The IndependentWenger told that Nasri is desperate to leave Arsenal
Midfielder determined to force £25m move to United in pursuit of silverware
By Ian Herbert, Northern Football Correspondent
Arsenal were facing up to the fact they may have no option but to sell Samir Nasri last night after the player's meeting with manager Arsène Wenger made it clear how desperate the player is to leave, following Manchester United's £20m offer.
The mood at Old Trafford has been one of mounting pessimism after the initial £20m offer for Nasri, tabled three weeks ago, failed to elicit even a formal rejection from the north London club. But only when the Frenchman returned to London Colney to meet his manager yesterday was Wenger exposed to the full sense of how badly Nasri wants to leave, with the prospect of the silverware at Old Trafford strengthening the player's resolve to go.
Nasri's own determination to go is now understood to be a more significant factor even than the commercial pressure the club will find themselves under to sell, should United raise their bid for a player who will be out of contract in only 12 months time and at liberty to walk away.
The narrow ownership structure of the club had been seen as another reason why United may have failed in their audacious bid to prise Nasri away, with a feeling that neither Alisher Usmanov nor Stan Kroenke would stand in Wenger's way if he wanted to keep the player.
Wenger is also understood to vehemently oppose the idea of selling the player to a rival club, which would make Manchester City and Chelsea – who have been monitoring the instability of Nasri's situation at Arsenal – equally unlikely suitors. Though Internazionale are understood to have had discussions with Nasri's representatives, too, the Frenchman is keen to stay in the Premier League and he seems to hold the cards.
But the fact that Arsenal may be willing to accept £25m, a figure only £5m above the initial United asking price, suggests that United will find the move for Nasri far more straightforward than they had initially thought. The uncertain factor in the equation, though, is the tribal rivalry which has characterised United's relationship with Arsenal.
There has been a feeling at the highest level within Old Trafford that removing Nasri from Arsenal may be considered akin to Liverpool trying to take a player from them. United remember the Gabriel Heinze saga, at the end of the 2006/7 season, in which Heinze demanded the right to be transferred to Liverpool and Sir Alex Ferguson steadfastly refused the £6.8m bid and Heinze went to Real Madrid the following August instead.
But, if anything, Nasri's desire to leave is even greater than Heinze's was back then. Wenger knows that all too clearly now.
Arsenal have rejected the £120,000-a-week deal he wants to take him to the top of Arsenal's payscale, and he will be out of contract next summer. A week ago, it had seemed that Arsenal would insist on an extortionate amount – £40m – to deter a United move, though a sum £5m above United's first valuation may be enough.
United's move for Nasri means that the prospect of the club moving for Wesley Sneijder is receding. The view from Milan is that Internazionale are ready to part company with the Dutchman, whose agent Sir Alex Ferguson met in London in April.
But it will take a £35m deal to prise Sneijder out of Inter's clutches and United's transfer culture – which generally rules out major investments in players over the age of 26 – also suggests that the prospect of Sneijder moving to Old Trafford are remote. The Dutchman turned 27 a month ago.
Yet you would sell to City who are more at your level.We won't sell Nasri to you. We'll let him walk next year rather than do that.
Have to agree.Yet you would sell to City who are more at your level.
Yup. Selling club.Remember Ashley Cole.
That's very harsh, especially as Cole aside, I'm struggling to think of a player they sold who went on to peak elsewhere.Yup. Selling club.
Buy em young, train em up, sell 'em before they peak.
anelka?That's very harsh, especially as Cole aside, I'm struggling to think of a player they sold who went on to peak elsewhere.
I mean the drag-out affair. will this go down the same road?Yup. Selling club.
Buy em young, train em up, sell 'em before they peak.
Not really.anelka?
Yeh fair enough. Sylvinho or Viera then?Not really.
Flopped in Madrid, did OKish in Ligue 1 and Turkey, wasn't all that special for Liverpool or Shitty, till he regained his clinical proficiency at the mighty Bolton. Wenger would have turned him into a sensation had he stayed, but instead he did what he was always destined to do - sulk.
Bad example as he was a moody twat from what I understand - would be terrible for a dressing room. I don't know how Chelsea handle him to be honest. Credit to their management for that.anelka?
I thought he did an interview just a short while ago saying trophies were a priority over money? Surely why he keeps being linked to us constantly?Because he'll get a lot more money for a year?
Sylvinho is a decent shout, but from what I remember he was more a backup player at Barca. Viera is debatable due to the injuries he was plagued with after leaving Arsenal.Yeh fair enough. Sylvinho or Viera then?
I haven't seen him spraying around 50 yard passes if that's what you mean. He is a very accurate, inventive passer over shorter distances though.Whats his passing like? Can he do some Scholes' like passing or is he more of a take the ball and run type of player?
That's like cutting off your nose to spite your face. If nothing else, Arsenal are a business and £20+m is a more than a fair price for a declining value of an asset.We won't sell Nasri to you. We'll let him walk next year rather than do that.
Although he wasn't sold.I'd say Van Bronckhorst is probably a better example. Flamini hasn't done too badly with Milan recently either.
David Herd, left Arsenal for United for a large fee because he wanted to win trophies. Won nothing in 7 years at Arsenal, 2 leagues and an FA cup at United.That's very harsh, especially as Cole aside, I'm struggling to think of a player they sold who went on to peak elsewhere.