sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,063
Snivelling cnuts.
Yes, they are Jewish. My badAre they? I assumed Jewish.
Is this a movie plot?And how do you think those clubs established those histories? I'll give you one example that implicates all 3 of the self proclaimed history clubs.
Arsenal haven't been relegated in a billion years, ironically they weren't promoted into the top division either. They were voted in on the back of Liverpool throwing a match to save Manchester United from being relegated (how times have changed eh...) which saw Spurs relegated instead and the league descend into a farce before it was put on hold for WW1.
When the league resumed 3 years later, were Spurs and Chelsea reinstated? Nope, would the newly 22 instead of 20 team league take the the top 4 from the 2nd division? Nope. Just the top 2 and 2 voted in clubs.
Chelsea who got shafted by the match fixing were given one spot. So where would the other go, Spurs who got relegated, 3rd placed Barnsley from Division 2. Nope at the sway of Sir Henry Norris (he was an MP btw...) Arsenal were elected in ahead of both. Interesting that, the 3 clubs who like to proclaim themselves as self made and built from nothing and fully earned. 1 bribed the other to stave off a relegation that could have changed the shape of English football, while the 3rd used an mp to bully their way in ahead of those deserving. But yeah.. sporting merit all throughout history is what put certain clubs in certain spots.
Just imagine how different football could have been.. but yeah earned on sporting merit right. We could also talk about the time United went bust and shity evil, awful Abu Dhabi loving City helped prevent them going bust etc.. History sir, is written by the victors.
I mean leave out football clubs which are worth hundreds of millions with a bunch of public scrutiny, even normal small business owners don't operate like that.What?
Don't go all racist on me.
The owners are muslim. Why wouldn't they buy players who believe what they believe?
If it's a too sensitive issue fine, i'll delete the post.
Just to be clear, no way in hell is this a dig for any religion.
Nope its factual history of football. Its not even hard to find. Sounds like one though... I know alot of supporters of those clubs don't know their own history and think their clubs were built by saints and hard work, but the truth is a lot shadier. I should also add I'm sure United, Liverpool and Arsenal aren't the only clubs guilty of this shit either just an example because it contains all 3 clubs known as the clubs who built themselves and 2 of them Englands most successful and biggest.Is this a movie plot?
Here we go……….In fairness your government has probably killed more
Well, that's not really the truth is it.I mean leave out football clubs which are worth hundreds of millions with a bunch of public scrutiny, even normal small business owners don't operate like that.
You really think if you start a business you'll only hire people that belong to some protected subgroup (religion / race / whatever)? (a) That's just straight up discrimination (b) You want the best person you can afford for the job, or you're going bust.
No they will not. /discussionIm just wondering if they will prefer them?
City haven't that policy in place nor do PSG why would Newcastle?Well, that's not really the truth is it.
A lot of Huge companies discriminate.
They hire mostly men over women.
Some even discriminate over race, prefer asians, more hardworking cliches, etc...lots of examples.
And the thing is, you have at least a 100 great football players, in their prime, who happen to be of islamic religion.
Namely Salah, Pogba, Rudiger, Kante ...
Im just wondering if they will prefer them?
All these digs and jokes on Saudis, most of them funny and not PC, but one mention of religion and every body jumps on my back.
Didn't even mean to go there, just found it interesing to discuss.
To be honest, some of us have been thinking that for years after we've seen how little Kroenke cares about trying to rebuild success.Spurs and Arsenal are probably thinking "yep, there is just no way back now. Midtable mediocrity forever". Leicester too.
Just thinking about if the Glazers had pursued this recruitment policy.Don't know whats so funny but ok.
Sorry I was replying to the tweet not your joke, your joke was high on the “dad joke” scale.Sorry. I was making a bad Saw joke.
I think they'll all be queuing up for the money of the guy who thinks what the Chinese are doing muslims is ok and thinks they are a great bunch of lads altogether. That is of course, once they keep doing business with him.Who here thinks they're gonna go after all the muslim players?
That's what.... throwing money at Salah, Pogba...who else would join that?
Well, they can buy a team in January if they really want.The statement: People are reacting like they can go out tomorrow and buy a whole new team....to which you said 'of course they can'
The implication therefore being that they will buy a new team in January.
Which they won't.
I seriously doubt it but who knows at this stage.To be honest I would guess a large majority of United fans outside of the caf wouldn’t care either.
Are the Saudis turning it over to fan ownership already?
Albeit, an ultra rich owner.Are the Saudis turning it over to fan ownership already?
If not then no they haven't, they've just swapped a cnut owner for an Uber cnut owner.
Corrected that for you.Are the Saudis turning it over to fan ownership already?
If not then no they haven't, they've just swapped a murderous cnut owner for an Uber cnut owner.
Anyone can buy a new team if they wanted, admittedly the quality may suffer with a less affluent club.Well, they can buy a team in January if they really want.
But no, nobody is saying they are going to buy a new team tomorrow, so stop being ridiculous.
Like who?Football is very strange at the moment.
Owners with ambition are seen as the enemy, whilst owners with no ambition are given a free pass for using clubs as a cash cow with no interest in anything but making money.
Sounds like you are a bit ignorant not racist tbh.Don't know whats so funny but ok.
Muslim lifestyle is a bit different, especially top athletes.
Praying at certain specific times,halal food, etc.
I don't know, seemed like a legit question to contribute. Maybe not, what do i know.
ENIC/Levy for one.Like who?
If they offer £80 million why the f not.Donny to Newcastle for 40m?
The implication is that the club backed by the £320bn SA PIF has greater buying power than anyone else.Anyone can buy a new team if they wanted, admittedly the quality may suffer with a less affluent club.
The implication here was that they will.
I'm not sure I'm the one being ridiculous, but as you were.
Not sure spending 1.2 bilion quid on a new stadium is accurately defined as having 'no ambition'.ENIC/Levy for one.
Yeah, the first part of this is well documented. The second bit, I think you'd have put equal effort into if there was more than an anecdotal story about it.And how do you think those clubs established those histories? I'll give you one example that implicates all 3 of the self proclaimed history clubs.
Arsenal haven't been relegated in a billion years, ironically they weren't promoted into the top division either. They were voted in on the back of Liverpool throwing a match to save Manchester United from being relegated (how times have changed eh...) which saw Spurs relegated instead and the league descend into a farce before it was put on hold for WW1.
When the league resumed 3 years later, were Spurs and Chelsea reinstated? Nope, would the newly 22 instead of 20 team league take the the top 4 from the 2nd division? Nope. Just the top 2 and 2 voted in clubs.
Chelsea who got shafted by the match fixing were given one spot. So where would the other go, Spurs who got relegated, 3rd placed Barnsley from Division 2. Nope at the sway of Sir Henry Norris (he was an MP btw...) Arsenal were elected in ahead of both. Interesting that, the 3 clubs who like to proclaim themselves as self made and built from nothing and fully earned. 1 bribed the other to stave off a relegation that could have changed the shape of English football, while the 3rd used an mp to bully their way in ahead of those more deserving. But yeah.. sporting merit all throughout history is what put certain clubs in certain spots.
Just imagine how different football could have been.. We could also talk about the time United were going out of business and shity evil, awful Abu Dhabi loving City helped prevent them going bust etc..
History sir, is written by the victors.
Nope. They want Martial for 80M.If they offer £80 million why the f not.
That’s your hot take? You know a whole world exists outside of fecking football right?Football is very strange at the moment.
Owners with ambition are seen as the enemy, whilst owners with no ambition are given a free pass for using clubs as a cash cow with no interest in anything but making money.
United?Like who?
Our owners get a free pass? I could've sworn I'd seen a few complaints about them over the years.United?
Make Martial a £100 million manNope. They want Martial for 80M.
Ignorant?Sounds like you are a bit ignorant not racist tbh.
If Corinthians became the world's richest football club I think we'd probably discuss that yeah.So you're telling me if they took over Corinthians tonight instead you would be posting on here?