Next Labour leader - Starmer and Rayner win

GDaly95

Says he's one of the best posters
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
6,299
Location
Wicklow, Ireland
I know nothing about this Starmer bloke, but if Labour aren't prepping in complete unity for a gigantic leap towards the centre, then they have lost the fecking plot.

It's just obviously what they need to do.
 

17 Van der Gouw

biffa bin
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
6,516
I know nothing about this Starmer bloke, but if Labour aren't prepping in complete unity for a gigantic leap towards the centre, then they have lost the fecking plot.

It's just obviously what they need to do.
If Rebecca Long-Bailey gets the gig, it won't be centrism on offer; and they won't get elected - especially with Burgon as deputy.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,548
In the interests of some balance to the "JUST DO CENTRISM" shouts, a good Twitter thread from the weekend which is a long list of exactly the type of centrist policy that was harmful and shouldn't be repeated.

I'm all for a compromise position within the party but for that to be successful it's important that new Labours mistakes aren't glossed over and repeated.
 
Last edited:

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
18,935
As we're now into the voting proper, we should get a poll up in here. No way to keep it to Labour members only but still worth a look I think.
 

esmufc07

Brad
Scout
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
49,892
Location
Lake Jonathan Creek
There's the diversity for diversities' sake candidate (Butler), the idiocy for idiocies' sake candidate (Burgon), and then the boring candidate for everyone else who's sane/not trolling (Rayner).
Murray and the Dr? Murray seems sensible enough whenever I’ve seen him talk.
 

EwanI Ted

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,755
In the interests of some balance to the "JUST DO CENTRISM" shouts, a good Twitter thread from the weekend which is a long list of exactly the type of centrist policy that was harmful and shouldn't be repeated.

I'm all for a compromise position within the party but for that to be successful it's important that new Labours mistakes aren't glossed over and repeated.
I dont think we need to worry about there being too few people bad mouthing New Labour just at the moment.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
In the interests of some balance to the "JUST DO CENTRISM" shouts, a good Twitter thread from the weekend which is a long list of exactly the type of centrist policy that was harmful and shouldn't be repeated.

I'm all for a compromise position within the party but for that to be successful it's important that new Labours mistakes aren't glossed over and repeated.
A lot of these policies are good, popular policies (obviously framed in the worst possible way). If Labour had adopted a similar stance in the last election they probably would've won.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,720
Location
The Zone
If Starmer wins it will basically just be Miliband 2.0, which sort makes a vote for him at bit useless tbh. Even if he wants the policy set of 2017 & 2019(Which is a big if in my view), all them will be watered down by the right of the PLP, who Starmer will be desperate to keep on side but this will in turn kill off the activist base and the young vote(And never be right wing enough for the red wall voters). Plus add in the fact the right wing press will treat him just like any other labour leader who isn't the godfather to one of Murdoch kids and that he is rather dull, it just seems like a huge waste of time, that in five years Labour will end up getting less votes than they did in 2019 and people will still be arguing about wither the party platform was too left wing(Maybe leaving the country isn't such a bad idea after all :smirk:)

At least with RLB or Nandy there's something of a ''plan''.

Still none of this is worth leaving the country over, the material conditions that gave rise to Corbyn and his set of left politics aren't suddenly going to disappear(And the tories are certainly not going to address them). The Gramsci quote basically works well for our current politics - ''The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.'' Just how Boris is quite clearly a morbid symptoms of a dying ideology(Thatcherism), a Starmer win would be something similar. A morbid symptom of trying to unite and bring together a increasing unequal society.

Yes we all live in a society
 
Last edited:

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,674
If Starmer wins it will basically just be Miliband 2.0, which sort makes a vote for him at bit useless tbh. Even if he wants the policy set of 2017 & 2019(Which is a big if in my view), all them will be watered down by the right of the PLP, who Starmer will be desperate to keep on side but this will in turn kill off the activist base and the young vote(And never be right wing enough for the red wall voters). Plus add in the fact the right wing press will treat him just like any other labour leader who isn't the godfather to one of Murdoch kids and that he is rather dull, it just seems like a huge waste of time, that in five years Labour will end up getting less votes than they did in 2019 and people will still be arguing about wither the party platform was too left wing(Maybe leaving the country isn't such a bad idea after all :smirk:)

At least with RLB or Nandy there's something of a ''plan''.

Still none of this is worth leaving the country over, the material conditions that gave rise to Corbyn and his set of left politics aren't suddenly going to disappear(And the tories are certainly not going to address them). The Gramsci quote basically works well for our current politics - ''The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.'' Just how Boris is quite clearly a morbid symptoms of a dying ideology(Thatcherism), a Starmer win would be something similar. A morbid symptom of trying to unite and bring together a increasing unequal society.

Yes we all live in a society
More grandiose political analysis from man proven wrong about everything all the time. How big a defeat to your thinking would it take for you to be humbled into reconsidering the worth of posting as definitively as often?

It could be that Labour's well is so poisoned by Corbyn it is hopeless but given you championed the guy and derided those who questioned your wisdom in doing so you now sound as unbalanced as a die hard Hillary Clinton supporter after Trump was elected. Living in a society doesn't mean you understand it. If all your predictions about it turn out to be wrong there is a clue there.

The quote doesn't work either as your whole diatribe of the last five years is summed up best as the old isn't dying as you would prefer it to.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
In the interests of some balance to the "JUST DO CENTRISM" shouts, a good Twitter thread from the weekend which is a long list of exactly the type of centrist policy that was harmful and shouldn't be repeated.

I'm all for a compromise position within the party but for that to be successful it's important that new Labours mistakes aren't glossed over and repeated.
These weren’t "mistakes". These were examples of triangulation and it’s how New Labour won 3 elections.
 
Last edited:

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,548
These weren’t "mistakes". These were examples of triangulation and it’s how New Labour won 3 elections.
A good example of the issue i was highlighting. Absolutely no introspection here on the issues New Labour had, no everything was hunky dory because new labour won :lol:

If that's the level of substance behind the call to centrism then it doesn't bode well for either wing of the party.

And no these weren't triangulation at all, I'm not sure you read many or any if you've come to that conclusion.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,720
Location
The Zone
More grandiose political analysis from man proven wrong about everything all the time. How big a defeat to your thinking would it take for you to be humbled into reconsidering the worth of posting as definitively as often?

It could be that Labour's well is so poisoned by Corbyn it is hopeless but given you championed the guy and derided those who questioned your wisdom in doing so you now sound as unbalanced as a die hard Hillary Clinton supporter after Trump was elected. Living in a society doesn't mean you understand it. If all your predictions about it turn out to be wrong there is a clue there.

The quote doesn't work either as your whole diatribe of the last five years is summed up best as the old isn't dying as you would prefer it to.
Oh come on that's a bit unfair, I've consistently said you are a massive bell end on here and have yet to be proven wrong. At least give me some credit for that.

The quote doesn't work either as your whole diatribe of the last five years is summed up best as the old isn't dying as you would prefer it to.
Yeah I don't think you quite get it but still nice try. Anyway have you got anymore ''triggernometry'' youtube videos to post ?
 
Last edited:

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
A good example of the issue i was highlighting. Absolutely no introspection here on the issues New Labour had, no everything was hunky dory because new labour won :lol:

If that's the level of substance behind the call to centrism then it doesn't bode well for either wing of the party.

And no these weren't triangulation at all, I'm not sure you read many or any if you've come to that conclusion.
Now you see, you miss the point. First, the lack of introspection is on your side not mine. The fact that NL won is the starting point - whether you like them or not these were winning policies. You need to understand why but you don’t seem to want to think about it. I’m not saying current labour needs to replicate the policies because they were tuned to specific circumstances but they might need to replicate the insight.

Second, these were indeed the result of triangulation when applied to the Party’s positioning as a whole. Again today is different and specific policies will be different but it seems to me Labour need a way to engage with right wing voters judging by how many more of them there seems to be than left wing voters.
 
Last edited:

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,648
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."

Mistreatment of civil servants is a serious problem and should be investigated. Unless that mistreatment leads to them killing themselves in which case please rejoin the party.
 

Ultimate Grib

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2016
Messages
2,102
Location
Static
Supports
LA Galaxy
What's everyones take? I've been on a blackout for nearly two months thanks to that orange turd. All I muster so far is that RLB is the continuity loser candidate and Starmer just vanilla. Who's get a fresh perpsective on candidates?
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,261
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
What's everyones take? I've been on a blackout for nearly two months thanks to that orange turd. All I muster so far is that RLB is the continuity loser candidate and Starmer just vanilla. Who's get a fresh perpsective on candidates?
Pretty much all you can say really. It's depressing and drawn out, there's no inspiration at all.

I'm still with Nandy, and I can't see it changing. If only because she has a bit more spark than Starmer (then so does a dead aaa battery) and it would be great to have a female leader. Other than that, there's really nothing interesting at all, it's all so typical Labour mostly in fighting and occasional "but the Tories!" point.
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
You'll definitely want to read this then:
How hilarious. Spelling right as "write" is satirical genius.

What do we think of Starmer's Labour Party College? Similar idea, less reflexively mocked, I suppose because it's Starmer and not Burgon and mocking Burgon seems to be a weird hobby for those with more time than sense.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,176
How hilarious. Spelling right as "write" is satirical genius.

What do we think of Starmer's Labour Party College? Similar idea, less reflexively mocked, I suppose because it's Starmer and not Burgon and mocking Burgon seems to be a weird hobby for those with more time than sense.
More like Starmer doesn't remind everyone of those placard waving SWP bores we all remember from Uni.
 

Ultimate Grib

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2016
Messages
2,102
Location
Static
Supports
LA Galaxy
Pretty much all you can say really. It's depressing and drawn out, there's no inspiration at all.

I'm still with Nandy, and I can't see it changing. If only because she has a bit more spark than Starmer (then so does a dead aaa battery) and it would be great to have a female leader. Other than that, there's really nothing interesting at all, it's all so typical Labour mostly in fighting and occasional "but the Tories!" point.
I been reading our CLP Facebook Group today. The whole party is very divided to the point you're either with us or against us. We did manage to nominate Starmer no thanks to myself though but at least it shows we have people with sense.

I could never support Nandy as she is the type of person that looks only after number one. She is very responsible for the Brexit mess we are in by going against the whip and not backing things like customs union free market etc.

How hilarious. Spelling right as "write" is satirical genius.

What do we think of Starmer's Labour Party College? Similar idea, less reflexively mocked, I suppose because it's Starmer and not Burgon and mocking Burgon seems to be a weird hobby for those with more time than sense.
Maybe because Burgeon is the incarnation of Benny Hill in politics.
 
Last edited:

Robbo's Shoulder

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
2,059
Location
Barrow-in-Furness
Supports
United and Barrow AFC
Anyone voted yet?

For leader I've gone
1. Nandy
2. Long Bailey
3. Starmer

Was planning on Starmer in 2nd but there's something about him I just can't take to.

In the deputy vote I've gone
1. Rayner
2. A N Other
3. S O Else
4. Never heard of em
5. Burgon