Watch us go for Poch despite Ten Hag clearly making himself available in the summer. Don’t understand where this high admiration for him is coming from within the board? Is trophies or progressive playing style? I mean his best run at Spurs is associated with playing 3 at the back, so why did they not go for Conte instead, who’s at least a proven winner? Just smacks of incompetency again.
Three at the back does means a side isn’t progressive? That’s not even how his best Spurs sides played, they were pretty renowned for being built from the pairing of Toby and Vertonghen.
What nonsense. Spurs played some brilliant stuff under Poch and he had multiple players playing the best football of their careers. He overachieved as much if not more than Ten Hag at Ajax. And not going after Conte was stupid, as was the idea thay his sides aren’t progressive.
As for trophies he was coaching Spurs. Not exactly a trophy winning juggernaut. And of course if he wins the league this year with PSG you’ll probably not give much credit for that but Ten Hag winning the Eredivisie will be a sign of a serial winner. Jumping through to discredit Poch doesn’t make what he did at Spurs any less impressive.
There’s at least as many questions with Ten Hag, we’ve seen multiple coaches succeed in the Netherlands only to fail miserably elsewhere. After his first three seasons Frank De Boer was one of the hottest coaches in football. So was his successor after getting to the Europa final. Neither lasted even a year in their next job.