Chances created in epl till this point in the season, chelsea 248 tottenham 299 arsenal 273 liverpool 312 man city 282 man utd 290, in contrast to that look at the goals scored, chelsea 48 tottenham 45 arsenal 51 liverpool 52 man city 47 man utd 33, our buildup play could be better but it definitely is not the problem our finishing though is a big one. iirc we are the worst team in pl at scoring sitters and equally bad at taking other gilt edged chances too, a proven goalscorer in the team would have had us competing with chelsea for the title not try to scrape top 4 as we are now.
While I don't wholly disagree with what you are saying I don't agree with using stats to prove the point. I see this more and more often as the trouble these days … breaking football down to pure stats and thinking that the results can point to a problem that even more stats can help one to fix. Football is not moneyball!
I agree that we need a "quicker" striker-force but not a more "proven" goalscorer which was the thing being debated. We are labouring attacks, we're creating small, semi-chances often trying to play our way through a whole team we've given time to assemble in defence and that "effort" gets logged as a "shot on target" or a "shot off target" exactly the same as any City / Liverpool / Arsenal / Chelsea /Spurs 4 v 2 break upfield does. Admittedly their "chances" also sometimes end up in a great save or a fantastic defensive move or even a simple miss - but they were normally
better chances (and probably more entertaining to watch too).
You only have to open your eyes and be a lover of good football to know that most of our oppos "chances created" were probably "good" or much "better" chances that broke through a thinner line of defence and led to a goal (more often than not) because of less bodies in the way, compared to our more profligate, telegraphed, one-against-seven/eight/nine/ten "chances" that came despite all the things I mentioned in my post you replied to! Which was my point … we need to fix that aspect of our game before we fork out for perceived better finishers.
There was nothing more refreshing to me than the breakaway goal that Mhiki scored in the FA cup tie last w'end – thinking that we can't use our player's skill, speed (sometimes) and creativity to do that against League opposition is crazy. We just have to
trust our players without the ball more often and bank them to be creative and adventurous when they do have it. We need to be more aggressive and creative in attack
from the first whistle, not play this possession game while we break them down and wait for them to fade (if they do).
That way, in my opinion, there will be "chances" of real substance created and although we might very well lose possession more often than score we'll still improve on what we're doing currently. I think we still have a bit of a hangover, especially from the players that were under LVG's tutelage … that being creative and losing the ball
(even if you score as a result) is
not better than pure possession! After all: LVG's theory was that our opposition cannot score if they don't have the ball … that, to me anyway, is not why I'm a Manchester United supporter!
EDITED: As I did not wholly disagree with what you said and needed to reinforce that!
EDIT2: Just realised you're a newbie so you probably can't reply until United win the next treble anyway so … I'm right, you're wrong!