I'm confused by the comments in this thread, are we now saying we didn't need a CM? Because I thought there was an overwhelming agreement that we did need a DM and it was naive not to buy one.
Yes, we did need a CM. But not getting one doesn't explain away or justify the problems we're seeing, because most teams need a player in a given position at a given time. No team is perfect.
City need a CF, for example. But if they were floundering like we are then Pep being unhappy that Kane wasn't signed would be right scoffed at given the money they've spent elsewhere.
Solskjaer has spent massive sums of money already, so it doesn't reflect well on him this many years in if the big solution to our problems is still to spend yet more money.
Also, the idea that he's rebuilt the squad is usually cited as one of the big pluses in his favour but you can't give him credit for the positives in that regard without also giving him his share of responsibility for the negatives. If CM is such a crippling problem, why did he spend big money on the likes Sancho & Diallo and give big wages to Ronaldo (while barely using VDB, the CM he actually purchased) rather than prioritise CM? And if we're saying he had little control in terms of those decisions, why would we think he was the driving force behind the transfer decisions we actually got right?