Rednotdead
New Member
Well, he has been practising his whole life.An absolute tosser of a man, but damn, he can walk like that? That's pretty impressive.
Well, he has been practising his whole life.An absolute tosser of a man, but damn, he can walk like that? That's pretty impressive.
I mean what the hell is that?udge: Fact that accused has quick temper does not mean he is a violent person
I did not get the impression that prison authorities were trying to vilify accused or brand him as a violent person
Pistorius is "a fallen hero who has lost his career", the judge says.
"Recovery is possible" but it will depend on his attitude, she says.
A long term of imprisonment will not serve justice in this matter, she says.
WTF. She sounds like a fan.A long term of imprisonment will not serve justice in this matter, she says.
Haha it was ridiculous the way she talked about him whilst her family were in the room. One of the most corrupt decisions you will see.Doesn't sound corrupt at all.
He's an absolute scum bag like every other murderer. Hope he suffers. That poor girls family have been tortured.
Quite a bit corrupt. It's a weak system and the judge has way too much power. But, he's getting six years, and considering I'm sure a lot of people expected him to get essentially zero, this is a win of sorts.How corrupt is the judicial system in SA?
Should a person's career have any bearing on the length of a sentence? I'm not sure it does in this case.Pistorius is "a fallen hero who has lost his career", the judge says.
How the hell does a judge who got it so wrong the first time 'round get to decide the result of the appeal?Prosecutor Gerrie Nel had argued in court that the sentence for murdering Reeva Steenkamp was “shockingly lenient and disturbingly inappropriate”.
But judge Thokozile Masipa on Friday rejected the application to appeal against the sentence at the supreme court.
Pistorius shot Steenkamp, a model and law graduate, in the early hours of Valentine’s Day in 2013, saying he mistook her for a burglar when he fired four times through the door of his bedroom toilet.
At his sentencing in July, Masipa listed mitigating factors for giving him less than half the minimum 15-year term for murder, including the athlete’s claim he believed he was shooting an intruder.
“I’m of the view that a long term of imprisonment will not serve justice,” Masipa said.
But Nel argued that the six-year sentence was flawed and that it should be appealed against.
Masipa was the judge who had originally convicted Pistorius of the lesser charge of culpable homicide, the equivalent of manslaughter. An appeals court upgraded his conviction to murder in December.
... Even by South African standards, this is pretty terrible.How the hell does a judge who got it so wrong the first time 'round get to decide the result of the appeal?
Understand your point, but if you think about it, your daughter will still be dead and you will be in prisonAwful decision, if I was reevas father I'd be counting the days till he's released then I'd get him.
If anyone ever brought serious harm (in his case murdered) to my daughter I'd be a one man wrecking crew.
Everyone says this kind of stuff, but in the end, revenge crimes are pretty rare. Fortunately.If anyone ever brought serious harm (in his case murdered) to my daughter I'd be a one man wrecking crew.
Oh well, I could manage 6 years inside, after all that is what they hand out for first degree murder in S.Africa.Understand your point, but if you think about it, your daughter will still be dead and you will be in prison
You sure that is the sentence EVERYONE gets?Oh well, I could manage 6 years inside, after all that is what they hand out for first degree murder in S.Africa.
Was being sarcastic, anyone else would've got 20+ years I'm sure, I guess being famous, rich and disabled has its perks.You sure that is the sentence EVERYONE gets?
How the hell does a judge who got it so wrong the first time 'round get to decide the result of the appeal?
Easy now. This is standard in law, not just South Africa. Plus SA law is based on the English law system being a previous colony . Original court makes verdict and gives sentence. Appeal court overturns verdict but cannot dish out sentence. Sentence then again given by original court based on new verdict. If prosecution still unhappy they have recourse. They can appeal the to the Judge President at the court in question. So it would be Judge Masipa's senior who will then most likely ask 3 different judges to have a look at it and decide based on that. If leave to appeal to granted it will go back to the appeal court that overturned the original verdict and they will then have powers to sentence.Not surprising in the slightest, but this...
... Even by South African standards, this is pretty terrible.
Different country different laws. If it were up to me, murder should be for a minimum 25 years, if not life. Rapist getting off with a few years is also a joke and the 9 years for robinho is justice.Robinho gets 9 years for for sexual assault and this guy gets 6 for murder.
Just like it's ok to show gore on film but showing a bare nipple? It must be porn