PL L FA Premier League

Arsenal 3:2 Manchester United

Post-match discussion


Sun, 22 January 2023

  • Based on the club's statement regarding Mason Greenwood, the site's current policy will continue until further clarity about the player's future is known.

    So to reiterate, all discussions about Mason Greenwood remain off limits.

PieCrust

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
1,509
It was good to see the fixture mean something again, been too long in that regard for both clubs.

I'm not too bothered by the result as we weren't challenging for the title anyway. Secure top 4, maybe a domestic cup, and move on with year 2 of ETH rebuild.
 

Pogue Mahone

Poster of the year 2008 & 2020
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
122,451
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I don't think that's accurate, actually. It was true also of long stretches of the first half. I've not seen a breakdown of how xG or other indicators distributed over the course of the game, but I would be very suprised if that disparity clustered primarily in the last half-hour. I do recall shots at half-time were more or less half the final total.

I think maybe the closeness of the score masked things a bit. It felt like a close game (and of course in terms of goals, it was).
I would be amazed if it wasn’t. Although xG is often misleading so can’t rule it out. Have a look online for the various minute by minute reports. Look at the half time summary’s. You’ll see an overwhelming consensus that the two teams were evenly matched at that point. It was the second half where it got away from us.
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
6,991
It was good to see the fixture mean something again, been too long in that regard for both clubs.

I'm not too bothered by the result as we weren't challenging for the title anyway. Secure top 4, maybe a domestic cup, and move on with year 2 of ETH rebuild.
If we won we would be 5 behind Arsenal (1 game in hand) and 3 behind City. Winning yesterday would absolutely have put us in a title contention.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,431
Arsenal 3 years into their development, us only 6 months into ours. We had a tough away game midweek after just playing City ...
Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.

If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.
ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.

I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
 

Pogue Mahone

Poster of the year 2008 & 2020
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
122,451
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.

If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.

ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.

I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
Do you have any idea how ironic it is to post that in a thread about this specific match? Did you not even notice Arsenal’s struggles over Arteta’s first couple of seasons in charge?
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
22,662
If we won we would be 5 behind Arsenal (1 game in hand) and 3 behind City. Winning yesterday would absolutely have put us in a title contention.
We aren't ready to CHALLENGE yet
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
4,102
I would be amazed if it wasn’t. Although xG is often misleading so can’t rule it out. Have a look online for the various minute by minute reports. Look at the half time summary’s. You’ll see an overwhelming consensus that the two teams were evenly matched at that point. It was the second half where it got away from us.
We both have a point - Arsenal's dominance (by shots as well by xG) was especially strong in the final 30 minutes, but it was also very pronounced in the first half.


Arsenal (Minutes: shots (xG))

1-15: 4 (xG 0.30)
16-30: 3 (xG 0.59)
31-45: 5 (xG 0.21)

46-60: 1 (xG 0,02)
61-75: 5 (xG 0,50)
76-90: 7 (xG 1.46)

Man Utd:

1-15: 0 (xG 0.0)
16-30: 2 (xG 0.46)
31-45: 0 (xG 0.0)

46-60: 3 (xG 0,17)
61-75: 0 (xG 0,0)
76-90: 1 (xG 0,06)

Comparative (ARS-MUN):

1st Half: Shots 12-2 (6:1), xG 1.10-0.46 (2.4:1)
2nd Half: Shots 13-4 (3.3:1), xG 2.18-0.23 (9.5:1)

Arsenal vs. Manchester United Match Report – Sunday January 22, 2023 | FBref.com
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
78,038
Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.

If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.
ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.

I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
How often have we seen the football improve almost instantly and have us beat nearly all of the top 6 with half of the season gone? Never. If you can't see the actual clear cut difference between ETH and our previous managers then I don't know how to help you.

Mourinho was always going to break down. Ole had us playing ok stuff but the foundations weren't there. LVG bored us to death.
 

RedRoach

Full Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
369
Fecking spare me from xG obsessives. There’s a hell of a lot more to judging a football match than fecking xG.

Picture this. Two teams play out a match which is evenly matched for an hour, with neither side creating many clearcut chances. Then one of the two teams finishes strongly and creates a bunch of decent chances, which gives them a high xG. That is not the same thing as that team “battering” the other team.

Actually, no need to picture it. Just try to remember last night’s game….
Agree with @Pogue Mahone here, xG or whatever that is doesn't tell the story here. At the end of the first half I felt the sides were evenly matched based on what I saw. The reason we lost this one was down to three primary things:

1. Fatigue. Arsenal were more rested and we simply ran out of gas towards the end. ETH tried to bring more energy on the pitch with the Fred substitution, but it didn't work.
2. Casemiro. The moment he got the yellow card in the last game we lost this one IMO. The drop off in quality in our midfield is staggering when he is not there. We would not have been dominated to the extent we were in the second half with him in the pitch, nor would we have looked as vulnerable.
3. VAR. If some 50-50 decisions had gone our way things could have been different.

Overall there is lots to be positive about, yes we were "battered" in the last 20 minutes but it doesn't paint the whole picture or is a reflection of the entire game. The squad we have still has too many cracks to be able to cope with a loss like Casemiro and also deal with keeping players rested and fresh. On this latter point I would like to see ETH rotate more and make earlier substitutions. Casemiro should have been taken off in the last game to save him for this one for example.
 
Last edited:

Superden

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
1,316
Agree with @Pogue Mahone here, xG or whatever that is doesn't tell the story here. At the end of the first half I felt the sides were evenly matched based on what I saw. The reason we lost this one was down to three primary things:

1. Fatigue. Arsenal were more rested and we simply ran out of gas towards the end. ETH tried to bring more energy on the pitch with the Fred substitution, but it didn't work.
2. Casemiro. The moment he got the yellow card in the last game we lost this one IMO. The drop off in quality in our midfield is staggering when he is not there. We would not have been dominated to the extent we were in the second half with him in the pitch, nor would we have looked as vulnerable.
3. VAR. If some 50-50 decisions had gone our way things could have been different.

Overall there is lots to be positive about, yes we were "battered" in the last 20 minutes but it doesn't paint the whole picture or is a reflection of the entire game. The squad we have still has too many cracks to be able to cope with a loss like Casemiro and also deal with keeping players rested in fresh. On this latter point I would like to see ETH rotate more and make earlier substitutions. Casemiro should have been taken off in the last game to save him for this one for example.
and that is away against a side that is being hailed as champions elect and has just broken 50 pts for half a season.

a last minute goal it took and over both games we did better (for whats it worth as a moral victory). and yet people are having a right whinge.
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,274
In case you missed it, Thierry Henry pretty much sang our praises and summed up the situation between the two teams quite well.

 

RedRoach

Full Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
369
In case you missed it, Thierry Henry pretty much sang our praises and summed up the situation between the two teams quite well.

Agreed, a perfect summary. In no way were Arsenal dominant until the last 20 minutes when the difference in schedules started to take its toll.
 

NFM

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
307
Technically you are correct in what you say.
But how often have we seen posts like this where the poster will say, "We are only 6 months into Jose/Ole/ETH's reign"?
Then a year or 2 later, the manager gets fired and we have to start again?
By having this mentality we will be trophyless for another 10 years at least.

If a manager joins Chelsea/MCFC/Madrid, etc, he is expected to have instant impact.
The days when a manager can expect to lose for 3 years straight at a big club are gone.
ETH will need to win trophies next season, at the latest or he too will be fired.

I know my standards are high, but given that we have one of the biggest budgets in World football, it is staggering how easily we accept losing.
Agree. The Manager is doing OK, but he made some poor calls this week. Coupled with the 'we're not ready to compete for the title' mentality still prevalent in the squad. Shaw comments about the team back peddling was classic given he spent most of the match doing exactly that faced with Saka. United team are about 3 years older than Arsenal, this lot will never be 'ready to compete'.
 

G-manc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
811
Disappointed to lose at the end after dropping points in injury time midweek but it’s clear to see where the upgrades in the squad are needed and I think ETH will know this too.
Id be surprised if any of AWB, Maguire, McTominay and Elanga are still about next season.
Eriksen has played too much football and doesn’t have the legs when we concede majority possession, the warning signs were there against City.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
19,057
I still can't understand why Garnacho was rested. He should have come on around 65th min and we should have gone for goals.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
12,622
Very disappointing we didn't take any points from the match. Subs should have done better and better subs should have been made. It would have been a different outcome had Case been in the lineup or we had a week of rest.
Some great goals scored and overall it was a very entertaining match. Not terribly fussed with the result at the end of the day. We're still in 4th and have traded points from both City and Arsenal. Arsenal have not played City yet and we had a draw against Newcastle.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
6,593
Arsenal: 24 shots, 2.90 xG.
United: 5 shots, 0.27 xG.

Which tells the same story as the eye-test: They battered us, we produced very little.
Arsenal had 24 shots, from low scoring chances (other than the Nketiah shot that hit DdG) what other clear cut chances did they have?

It’s a cumulative statistic so any team with more shots will ‘win’. Out of the 24 shots they had 12 were blocked shots, which would still add to the xG cumulative despite being blocked.

Using xG as a trend is the best use of the statistic (ie over the course of a season or a few games). For game by game insight and analysis, it has limited use.

Arsenal were playing at home and scored due to an mis hit from Odegaard which took a nick off Fred and went to the only Arsenal player in a position to score. There’s definitely a huge slice of luck which led to Arsenal winning and you get that luck from keeping the ball in our half and trying and trying again.
 

DrRodo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
1,719
Location
Chile
If the team was knackered, then why oh why didnt ETH make more subs? Only fred came on and garnacho apparently at the very end but i didnt even realized in the tv transmission

I think malacia, pellistri, garnacho and even fecking mcguire should had been given 5-10 minutes at least. It really backfired at the end
 

Hughie77

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,943
The 90min winner was a killer, Ramsgate makes a great save otherwise we go 2-3 . Small margins in big games, also injuries and suspension play a part in league season, we were without Casimero, Dalot Martial imo those 3 would have made a difference. It also highlights the need for players in summer.

Eth has been here 6mth or so, Arteta is in his 3rd season, and some on here are pissed we didn't win , I'm pissed but there is a bigger picture its improvement in a short time, and if we'd got 3pts v Palace it wouldn't have been a bitter pill.

Next game is now the biggest one then the next then the one after that, this result shouldn't derail a decent 6 mths .
 

AFC NimbleThumb

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
5,960
The 90min winner was a killer, Ramsgate makes a great save otherwise we go 2-3 . Small margins in big games, also injuries and suspension play a part in league season, we were without Casimero, Dalot Martial imo those 3 would have made a difference. It also highlights the need for players in summer.

Eth has been here 6mth or so, Arteta is in his 3rd season, and some on here are pissed we didn't win , I'm pissed but there is a bigger picture its improvement in a short time, and if we'd got 3pts v Palace it wouldn't have been a bitter pill.

Next game is now the biggest one then the next then the one after that, this result shouldn't derail a decent 6 mths .
The fact I’m yet to hear this properly addressed by pundits is what annoys me most. They throw us in to some ‘title race’ then when a vastly more settled squad scrape a 3-2 act surprised.

I hate Arsenal with a passion so I’m fuming but they better hope they win the league this year because give EtH a few more strings to his bow & yesterday doesn’t happen.

It’s not even a Casemiro specific issue, it’s having a McT to replace him. Once EtH can plug those gaps we’ll be fine, a half decent DM replacement yesterday makes a massive difference. We need to finish the year strong & hope the club gets sold so that debt can be eradicated & the club can work unshackled.
 

Buxton

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
63
Supports
Arsenal
Our performance has definitely got better since the final whistle. Had it ended 2-2 United would’ve been roundly congratulated on a creditable draw. Fine margins.
XG means nothing, United’s game plan was working and ours wasnt. It was only in the last 20 minutes that we were totally dominant. Before that it was a throw back to a United Arsenal match from the fergie wenger years, you really couldn’t call it. Last 20 was one way traffic and United clearly suffered from midweek.
I was far more impressed with United yesterday then I was watching them against palace in midweek.Dropping points at palace was very poor. Yesterday United took part in an excellent game and ran out of steam. Some of the criticisms here are a bit OTT
 
  • Like
Reactions: 711

redmanx

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
1,200
Losing to this exceptional Arsenal team is no disgrace and we matched them everywhere on the field, but conceding a goal like we did in the dying moments is hard to take. How ever its clear DDG, for all his brilliance at making impossible saves, is not comfortable with the ball at his feet, and though he has improved in that respect he is a target for the opposition when he tries to kick. Anthony was not at his best and I would have liked to see Garnacho come on for hime for the second half. Wan Bissaka had a very good game but still has moments when he loses concentration. Bruno is a real leader and fights for everything. Rashford has made me eat humble pie as I truly believed that after last season he was washed up, now hes playing better than ever and most importantly is playing with a smile! Martinez is a true diamond and is already a cult hero due to his no nonsense style of playing, he must be terrifying to play against. I still think we can finish 3rd but if City were to slip up, maybe, just maybe we can edge them for runners up!
 

Waynne

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
1,106
Theirry Henry:

“Today, we saw a team with three years development vs a team with six months. Also, a team with a full week of rest against a team with two days rest, and still Manchester United went toe to toe, which was surprising. I thought Arsenal would be all over United from kick-off and United’s players would sit back. I was wrong. United in fact had better control in the first half.


I'm proud of the team and Ten Hag. Was annoying we couldn't come away with at least a point but considering above comments from Henry, its great progress.
In 3 years we should be twatting teams left and right.
 

Wing Attack Plan R

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
4,564
Location
Loss Ann Juh Liss
We lost a game of football to a team that outplayed us on the day while missing the linchpin of our midfield. There’s no need for an inquest…

…that said, why did ETH wait so long to bring on Garnacho, and eventually not use 3 subs available? If we’re holding on for the whistle, taking time off the clock and energy out of the game is a valid tactic.
 
Last edited:

NICanRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
134
Eriksen has played too much football and doesn’t have the legs when we concede majority possession
Obviously I don't know the specifics but given Eriksen's medical history I suspect that he is taking a beta-blocker. This medication would sap his energy. We should be playing him because of his undoubted ability but recognize that he may only have 70 mins in the tank and plan accordingly.
I think our progress is encouraging and should stand us in good stead when we go to the market for new players. A year ago (or less) we were a team with no direction "lead" by an old player with a huge ego. Now we look like an attractive option for ambitious young players.
 

tenpoless

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
12,305
Location
Ronaldo's money chest
Theirry Henry:

“Today, we saw a team with three years development vs a team with six months. Also, a team with a full week of rest against a team with two days rest, and still Manchester United went toe to toe, which was surprising. I thought Arsenal would be all over United from kick-off and United’s players would sit back. I was wrong. United in fact had better control in the first half.

I'm proud of the team and Ten Hag. Was annoying we couldn't come away with at least a point but considering above comments from Henry, its great progress.
In 3 years we should be twatting teams left and right.
He is sensible most of the times. Aside from when he was blaming Chicharito for not celebrating with Ronaldo when Chicha scored a goal in CL.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
14,992
would have preferred martinez in midfield instead if mctominay yesterday, at least we would have had a proper warrior battling in midfield and a far better passer as well and then had shaw in defence again with malacia at ĺeft back.
I'd been saying that from the moment Casemiro got booked at Palace
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
18,915
Theirry Henry:

“Today, we saw a team with three years development vs a team with six months. Also, a team with a full week of rest against a team with two days rest, and still Manchester United went toe to toe, which was surprising. I thought Arsenal would be all over United from kick-off and United’s players would sit back. I was wrong. United in fact had better control in the first half.

I'm proud of the team and Ten Hag. Was annoying we couldn't come away with at least a point but considering above comments from Henry, its great progress.
In 3 years we should be twatting teams left and right.
I'm not sure if that's praise for us or criticism for Arsenal.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
18,915
Arsenal: 24 shots, 2.90 xG.
United: 5 shots, 0.27 xG.

Which tells the same story as the eye-test: They battered us, we produced very little.
Kind of shows why xG is a stupid stat if you don't know how to use it.

We didn't have Casemiro so ETH set us up to break up play and counter. We didn't set out to keep the ball in midfield and have multiple speculative shots from nowhere like Arsenal did. Doesn't look good on the xG stats, but it fit perfectly with our tactic and save for a fluke goal in minute 90 it worked.

Nobody could have watched that game and not been impressed with us, and a little disappointed with Arsenal.
 

G-manc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
811
Obviously I don't know the specifics but given Eriksen's medical history I suspect that he is taking a beta-blocker. This medication would sap his energy. We should be playing him because of his undoubted ability but recognize that he may only have 70 mins in the tank and plan accordingly.
I think our progress is encouraging and should stand us in good stead when we go to the market for new players. A year ago (or less) we were a team with no direction "lead" by an old player with a huge ego. Now we look like an attractive option for ambitious young players.
I think he most definitely has a part to play (you only have to look at how many chances created/assists he has). I have no issue with him in a two against ‘lesser’ opposition, however, he was pretty much bypassed in both the city and Arsenal games. His lack of athleticism combined with Bruno not looking after the ball, it’s a bad mix in these sort of games.
I do understand that at this stage, Eriksen not being rotated/rested is likely down to a lack of other options.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
4,102
Kind of shows why xG is a stupid stat if you don't know how to use it.

We didn't have Casemiro so ETH set us up to break up play and counter. We didn't set out to keep the ball in midfield and have multiple speculative shots from nowhere like Arsenal did. Doesn't look good on the xG stats, but it fit perfectly with our tactic and save for a fluke goal in minute 90 it worked.

Nobody could have watched that game and not been impressed with us, and a little disappointed with Arsenal.
Oh, come on. It's not like anyone's putting up the xG as the catch-all Single Final Big Proof that we were shit and Arsenal were great, overruling a lot of conflicting information. The point, made repeatedly, is that xG, shots, touchmaps (Arsenal had 59 touches in our penalty area, we had 11 in theirs. Tomiyasu, a defensive FB who played half the game, had more than any of our players) and eye-test all tell the same story, which is that they subjected us to very heavy offensive pressure, while we did not produce very much in the way of scoring chances. There are clear limits to what xG tells you about a single game, but when it's this disparate, and the shots are equally disparate, and the touchmap tell the same story, and when it was an obvious feature of the game while it was going on that we struggled to control them when they were in possession around our box (for my part I was worried enough about that that I made a post in the match thread about it during the break), what exactly is the point here? That Arsenal were taking lots of speculative shots while we produced fewer but more high-quality chances? Because we really didn't (and of course, if we did, that would also have showed up in the xG). These were the five finishes with the biggest scoring chance of the game:

1. Nketiah (90) 0.61 (Arsenal's third goal)
2. Nketiah (84) 0.47
3. Nketiah (24) 0.42 (Arsenal's first goal)
4. Ødegaard (2) 0.17
5. Nketiah (64) 0.17

We didn't have a single chance that even reached the 0.10 threshold.

Also, I think you'll find that possession was actually about even after the first half. Which is probably one of the reasons this still felt like a close game, and which also contradicts the notion that this was a game where we were happy to sit back and let them have the ball.

So yeah, it was close and we fought well and we've showed progress and there's no reason to hang our heads over this game. But there just isn't a reasonable way of looking at this game that leads you to something other than Arsenal outperforming us big time when it came to generating offense. We didn't produce much, they produced a lot.
 
Last edited:

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
3,943
We may have actually been better off points wise out of the past 3 games had we just drawn against city or even suffered a loss, it seems like it was a case of an emotional high hangover like seen in the past in big games usually in big European nights and it had a knock on effect over the last 2 games within the week
 

Pogue Mahone

Poster of the year 2008 & 2020
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
122,451
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Kind of shows why xG is a stupid stat if you don't know how to use it.

We didn't have Casemiro so ETH set us up to break up play and counter. We didn't set out to keep the ball in midfield and have multiple speculative shots from nowhere like Arsenal did. Doesn't look good on the xG stats, but it fit perfectly with our tactic and save for a fluke goal in minute 90 it worked.

Nobody could have watched that game and not been impressed with us, and a little disappointed with Arsenal.
I would disagree with that last sentence. We were impressive in the first half. Arsenal were impressive for 90 minutes. I don’t think anyone would be disappointed with them. In fact, that was arguably their most impressive performance of the season.
 

ayushreddevil9

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
8,158
We lost a game of football to a team that outplayed us on the day while missing the linchpin of our midfield. There’s no need for an inquest…

…that said, why did ETH wait so long to bring on Garnacho, and eventually not use 3 subs available? If we’re holding on for the whistle, taking time off the clock and energy out of the game is a valid tactic.
His game management is a bit sus atm, ngl.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
18,915
Oh, come on. It's not like anyone's putting up the xG as the catch-all Single Final Big Proof that we were shit and Arsenal were great, overruling a lot of conflicting information. The point, made repeatedly, is that xG, shots, touchmaps (Arsenal had 59 touches in our penalty area, we had 11 in theirs. Tomiyasu, a defensive FB who played half the game, had more than any of our players) and eye-test all tell the same story, which is that they subjected us to very heavy offensive pressure, while we did not produce very much in the way of scoring chances. There are clear limits to what xG tells you about a single game, but when it's this disparate, and the shots are equally disparate, and the touchmap tell the same story, and when it was an obvious feature of the game while it was going on that we struggled to control them when they were in possession around our box (for my part I was worried enough about that that I made a post in the match thread about it during the break), what exactly is the point here? That Arsenal were taking lots of speculative shots while we produced fewer but more high-quality chances? Because we really didn't (and of course, if we did, that would also have showed up in the xG). These were the five finishes with the biggest scoring chance of the game:

1. Nketiah (90) 0.61 (Arsenal's third goal)
2. Nketiah (84) 0.47
3. Nketiah (24) 0.42 (Arsenal's first goal)
4. Ødegaard (2) 0.17
5. Nketiah (64) 0.17

We didn't have a single chance that even reached the 0.10 threshold.

Also, I think you'll find that possession was actually about even after the first half. Which is probably one of the reasons this still felt like a close game, and which also contradicts the notion that this was a game where we were happy to sit back and let them have the ball.

So yeah, it was close and we fought well and we've showed progress and there's no reason to hang our heads over this game. But there just isn't a reasonable way of looking at this game that leads you to something other than Arsenal outperforming us big time when it came to generating offense. We didn't produce much, they produced a lot.
Well that's kind of what you just said...
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
18,915
I would disagree with that last sentence. We were impressive in the first half. Arsenal were impressive for 90 minutes. I don’t think anyone would be disappointed with them. In fact, that was arguably their most impressive performance of the season.
Considering the results and plaudits they've been getting I was expecting more from them, considering we are far from the finished article, our most important player was missing, and we were at their ground. We matched them for 89 minutes. I expected them to control us better.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
4,102
Well that's kind of what you just said...
Sorry, but are you taking the piss here or what? That is exactly what I have repeatedly and explicitly been clear is NOT what I'm saying. xG, eye test, touch map, shots - they all tell the same story.
 
X

Player Ratings

5.6 Total Average Rating

Highest Rated Player

Lowest Rated Player

Compiled from 252 ratings.

Score Predictions

90,104,49
  • Man Utd win
  • Arsenal win
  • Draw

Detailed Results

  • 21% Arsenal 1:2 Man Utd
  • 15% Arsenal 2:1 Man Utd
  • 13% Arsenal 1:1 Man Utd
  • 9% Arsenal 2:0 Man Utd
  • 8% Arsenal 3:1 Man Utd
  • 5% Arsenal 0:1 Man Utd
  • 5% Arsenal 3:0 Man Utd
  • 5% Arsenal 1:3 Man Utd
  • 5% Arsenal 2:2 Man Utd
  • 2% Arsenal 0:0 Man Utd
  • 2% Arsenal 2:3 Man Utd
  • 2% Arsenal 0:2 Man Utd
  • 2% Arsenal 4:0 Man Utd
  • 1% Arsenal 3:2 Man Utd
  • 1% Arsenal 1:0 Man Utd
  • 1% Arsenal 1:4 Man Utd
  • 0% Arsenal 5:0 Man Utd
  • 0% Arsenal 5:1 Man Utd
  • 0% Arsenal 9:1 Man Utd
  • 0% Arsenal 0:3 Man Utd
  • 0% Arsenal 0:5 Man Utd
  • 0% Arsenal 4:1 Man Utd
Compiled from 243 predictions.
Show more results Score Predictions League Table

Match Stats

  1. Arsenal
  2. Man Utd
Possession
58% 42%
Shots
25 6
Shots on Target
5 4
Corners
12 4
Fouls
8 9

Referee

Anthony Taylor