FireballXL5
Full Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Messages
- 10,231
Bournemouth's defence
His shoulder was clearly offside. Correct decision.That's a genuine disgrace of a decision
No way he's 100% offside
Unless you can tell where his shoulder stops and where his arm starts over top his shirt, then no, it wasn't clear.His shoulder was clearly offside. Correct decision.
One frame the other way and it was onside.His shoulder was clearly offside. Correct decision.
The top of his shoulder, which is a scoring body part, was clearly ahead of play.Unless you can tell where his shoulder stops and where his arm starts over top his shirt, then no, it wasn't clear.
Changed to what? A six centimetre margin of comfort? What happens when attacker is seven centimetres ahead of play?The offside law needs to be changed, this has nothing to do with fairness anymore. It's like we want to find as many ways as possible to make sure goals aren't scored. It's a ridiculous situation.
NopeThe top of his shoulder, which is a scoring body part, was clearly ahead of play.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I can't stand this whole armpit/shoulder nonsense. I've always thought just look at the shoes and only flag when both attackers feet are fully ahead. At least that's a genuine advantage, and much clearer.Changed to what? A six centimetre margin of comfort? What happens when attacker is seven centimetres ahead of play?
It’s a ridiculous argument - if one was to consider arguing for it.
But that has never been the rules. You might like it to be that way, but it’s a big jump from existing (or previous) laws of the game.I can't stand this whole armpit/shoulder nonsense. I've always thought just look at the shoes and only flag when both attackers feet are fully ahead. At least that's a genuine advantage, and much clearer.
I know and it won't happen, but I feel it's much more in the spirit of why offside was originally introduced. Not to punish millimetres but to prevent strikers hanging around close to the goal.But that has never been the rules. You might like it to be that way, but it’s a big jump from existing (or previous) laws of the game.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date