acnumber9
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 22,292
It looked close to offside for me.
Coming from someone who feels they can dictate to other people? Stop being an arse!You’re hard.
How’s that working out then ?City are dominating.
It was 100%. Goal looked offside, too. VAR said it wasn't though.Not watching the game, listening to radio. 5live were going crazy. Said it was a definite penalty.
Of course. It’s what happens when you make your own luck obviously.So Sheffield have one ruled out for a big toe being offside, but Salah’s entire head which he used to score is fine?
I know what you mean but current rules (I think) doesn't look at intent but (1) if not hand/arm and (2) if arm made body shape larger.How was Alexander-Arnold supposed to get out the way of that?
Nah, VAR is only for teams like Sheffield Utd, Bournemouth etcWas that even checked for offside, or was it a casual glance by the VAR official?
Based on recent decisions, it could have been ruled out.Salahs knee was offside no?
because narrativeSky are really shit at showing replays. Looked offside but I guess we won't see it again.
Get Given £250m no doubt.Interesting what would happen if Pep don't win CL or PL this season.
He was a good yard offside when the ball was played.Why no VAR there? I'm so confused.
The initial replay shows his knee was off to me. Every other decision like that sky show about 10 replays of it. Laughable.a replay was shown, but not a VAR one with the lines
both goals posted@GifLord any chance of goals and incidents, pretty please
5 month title winning prosession from Scouse for us to endure.League done in November.
Looks that way doesn’t it.So its finally their year...
I don’t think that matters if the arm is in an unnatural position and stops the ball. In the end that is a matter of interpretation though.How was Alexander-Arnold supposed to get out the way of that?
That will happen in JanuaryGet Given £250m no doubt.
Yeah, the only question now is if they can get to 21 before Klopp finally fecks-offSo its finally their year...
I'm lazy I shouldn't have doubted youboth goals posted
What can you do when they aren't determined to help Liverpool.It was 100%. Goal looked offside, too. VAR said it wasn't though.
Lucky, lucky Liverpool.Wait, so Liverpool get an offside break and handball not given in the 1st half already? Come on now.
Sadly this confirms chances > possession. :/City are dominating.
This is the bit that annoys me. It's definitely worth another look, but the commentators aren't even discussing the possibility of it being offside.The initial replay shows his knee was off to me. Every other decision like that sky show about 10 replays of it. Laughable.