Premier League Gameweek 25

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
That's irrelevant though
Well it is if you’re going by the rules. If you think TAA intentionally blocked him then it’s a foul, but he clearly doesn’t as he doesn’t even know where he is!
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
And what’s the issue with that? He’s allowed to be anywhere on the pitch. Sliding In front of somebody isn’t illegal.

IF TAA deviated his path to stop DCL getting the ball then it would’ve been a foul, but he’s on his backside not even looking at him! DCL is stumbling and runs right into the back of him .
DCL is running towards the ball to tap it into the net. The onus isn't on him to avoid TAA sliding into him. The onus is on TAA to make sure his deliberate slide along the ground doesn't make contact with a player and prevent them from playing the ball.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Please think about this for a moment :lol:

DCL was looking for it though. 100%.
No you think about it :lol:

he chooses the easiest path and messed it up. Extremely lucky to get that given. If you try and leapfrog a bollard in the street and catch your knee on it you aren’t suing the council are you? This is bonkers
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
DCL is running towards the ball to tap it into the net. The onus isn't on him to avoid TAA sliding into him. The onus is on TAA not to slide along the ground and make contact with a player preventing them from playing the ball.
TAA DOESNT SLIDE INTO HIM he is already there! Lewin comes from behind him and hits into him! You guys are nuts :lol:
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
I’ll be honest I can’t figure out if that’s a penalty or not. At first I thought stone wall pen, then on replay I thought it was harsh.

He sort of runs into the back of TAA, but then has TAA obstructed him, I’m struggling tbh.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,376
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
No you think about it :lol:

he chooses the easiest path and messed it up. Extremely lucky to get that given. If you try and leapfrog a bollard in the street and catch your knee on it you aren’t suing the council are you? This is bonkers
You probably would if the council erected it during the precise moment in time you happened to be moving in that direction. Plus, it'd be well rude.

P.s. I'm enjoying this debate.
 

cvb

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
59
Location
Boston, MA. Formerly Hyde.
Supports
City
I thought the penalty award and non-red card was the correct decision. On Calvert-Lewin's original shot, Alexander-Arnold lunges and makes a genuine attempt to play the ball. The result of TAA's lunge is that he ends up where he does when Alisson parries the ball and Calvert-Lewin trips over him. It needs to be a penalty because it almost certainly prevents a goal being scored, but I don't have an issue with the ref's interpretation that the offence committed by TAA was a result of him trying to play the ball.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,945
TAA DOESNT SLIDE INTO HIM he is already there! Lewin comes from behind him and hits into him! You guys are nuts :lol:
If it's as you say, then any defender can just innocently slide in front of an attacker's space and force him to run into them, or go around
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,508
Well it is if you’re going by the rules. If you think TAA intentionally blocked him then it’s a foul, but he clearly doesn’t as he doesn’t even know where he is!
Yes that's why everybody is saying it's a penalty and a red card

Common sense doesn't come into it
It's the reason David luiz got sent off too, as he clearly was running and made no attempt to make a challenge

As it stands now, if you deny a goal scoring challenge it's a penalty
If you aren't attempting to play the ball it's a red

I don't know why you keep bringing up intentionally?
That has absolutely no baring on whether a penalty should be given or not
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
TAA DOESNT SLIDE INTO HIM he is already there! Lewin comes from behind him and hits into him! You guys are nuts :lol:

Not only is TAA still sliding when contact is made, he continues sliding beyond that point too.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
If it's as you say, then any defender can just innocently slide in front of an attacker's space and force him to run into them, or go around
No because that would be intending on blocking the attacker, you can’t deviate your path on purpose to stop somebody.

his action of sliding is to block the shot, not block DCL getting to the spilt shot. 2 phases of play are very important here.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,376
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell

Not only is TAA still sliding when contact is made, he continues sliding beyond that point too.
The series of events is:

1 - Ball is played through
2 - TAA goes to block it with a slide tackle
3 - TAA doesn't win the ball
4 - TAA obstructs DCL from getting the ball as it's being palmed back from Alisson's paw creating an obvious goalscoring opportunity.

Admittedly DCL doesn't pole vault over the boy and TAA didn't mean to kill him but it's definitely an obstruction of sorts.

Edit - Also DCL knew what he was doing and did it well he did.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Yes that's why everybody is saying it's a penalty and a red card

Common sense doesn't come into it
It's the reason David luiz got sent off too, as he clearly was running and made no attempt to make a challenge

As it stands now, if you deny a goal scoring challenge it's a penalty
If you aren't attempting to play the ball it's a red

I don't know why you keep bringing up intentionally?
That has absolutely no baring on whether a penalty should be given or not
No this and David luiz are nothing alike at all. Very very different. Luiz creates the contact.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954

Not only is TAA still sliding when contact is made, he continues sliding beyond that point too.
So you admit it’s still the first action of him blocking the shot.
The series of events is:

1 - Ball is played through
2 - TAA goes to block it with a slide tackle
3 - TAA doesn't win the ball
4 - TAA obstructs DCL from getting the ball as it's being palmed back from Alisson's paw creating an obvious goalscoring opportunity.

Admittedly DCL doesn't pole vault over the boy and TAA didn't mean to kill him but it's definitely an obstruction of sorts.
You can see it yourself! He’s already off balance and stumbling and runs into him :lol: just admit you thought he did more than you remembered and let’s move on this is tedious.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
No no, I want to keep going. Eventually we'll be having pistols at dawn :lol:
Ugh! Look im having a hard time with this as I’m absolutely pissing myself laughing at liverpool losing again, but my love of football is stopping me enjoying this one.

Football is a contact sport and sometimes things happen, this is just 1 of those freak situations where you have to say it’s a coming together and play on.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,508
No this and David luiz are nothing alike at all. Very very different. Luiz creates the contact.
The players back foot kicks luiz which causes the stumble

But regardless you're missing the point
You keep bringing up if a foul is intentional or not, and that's irrelevant
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
So you admit it’s still the first action of him blocking the shot.

You can see it yourself! He’s already off balance and stumbling and runs into him :lol: just admit you thought he did more than you remembered and let’s move on this is tedious.
There's only one action, him sliding with the intent of blocking the shot.

As people keep telling you though, what he intended to do has absolutely zero bearing on whether it's a penalty or not.

He slid, he made contact with the player, it's a penalty. When he makes the decision to slide, it's his responsibility to make sure that contact doesn't happen, accidentally or not. It isn't DCL's responsibility to avoid the player sliding into him as he goes to play the ball. Whether he intended for it to be a block or a tackle couldn't be any less relevant.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
The players back foot kicks luiz which causes the stumble

But regardless you're missing the point
You keep bringing up if a foul is intentional or not, and that's irrelevant
It really isn’t as it’s DCL that runs into the player on the floor. If TAA did an intentional action to trip him it would be a penalty, he didn’t. You can’t just run into a player and then hit the floor you realise that right?
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
There's only one action, him sliding with the intent of blocking the shot.

As people keep telling you though, what he intended to do has absolutely zero bearing on whether it's a penalty or not.

He slid, he made contact with the player, it's a penalty. When he makes the decision to slide, it's his responsibility to make sure that contact doesn't happen, accidentally or not. It isn't DCL's responsibility to avoid the player sliding into him as he goes to play the ball.
He didn’t make contact with DCL, DCL made contact with him. stop making it up to suit your agenda. If TAA is ahead of Lewin how can it be him initiating the contact? Use your brain please.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,508
It really isn’t as it’s DCL that runs into the player on the floor. If TAA did an intentional action to trip him it would be a penalty, he didn’t. You can’t just run into a player and then hit the floor you realise that right?
You keep bringing up intentional action :lol:
Intent was removed from the rules

You either accept that or keep bringing it up, that's up to you as you clearly want to ignore that
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,070
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
It really isn’t as it’s DCL that runs into the player on the floor. If TAA did an intentional action to trip him it would be a penalty, he didn’t. You can’t just run into a player and then hit the floor you realise that right?
How many times are you going to be reminded that intent is irrelevant before the point finally gets through to you?
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,508
Anyway Fulham 0-0 Sheffield United

Can clearly see the excitement for this game from all :lol:
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
How many times are you going to be reminded that intent is irrelevant before the point finally gets through to you?
How many times are you going to understand that he has to intentionally be blocking him getting the ball for it to be a foul? He’s allowed to be sitting on the floor if he wants.

say he’s sitting in the centre circle looking at his own goal meditating and DCL decides to run after a ball and runs straight into him instead of going around, is that a foul?
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
He didn’t make contact with DCL, DCL made contact with him. stop making it up to suit your agenda.
Of course he made contact with DCL. One player was running to the ball, the other slid into him.

You're having an absolute mare here. A few posts ago you were trying to argue he wasn't sliding when we can all see he was, now you're trying to argue that it's the guy running to the ball's responsibility to avoid the guy sliding into him nowhere near the ball.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,070
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
How many times are you going to understand that he has to intentionally be blocking him getting the ball for it to be a foul? He’s allowed to be sitting on the floor if he wants.

say he’s sitting in the centre circle looking at his own goal meditating and DCL decides to run after a ball and runs straight into him instead of going around, is that a foul?
I don’t even...
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
How many times are you going to understand that he has to intentionally be blocking him getting the ball for it to be a foul? He’s allowed to be sitting on the floor if he wants.

say he’s sitting in the centre circle looking at his own goal meditating and DCL decides to run after a ball and runs straight into him instead of going around, is that a foul?
No he doesn't! Intent has zero to do with whether it's a foul or not. It's not even a factor in the decision.
 

kaiz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
117
No he doesn't! Intent has zero to do with whether it's a foul or not. It's not even a factor in the decision.
He seems to have the idea that TAA just sat there innocently and DCL just ran into him, when it's clear TAA is still sliding even right now long after the contact.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,317
Fair play to Fulham. They've given themselves half a chance here.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Newcastle were so dependent on Wilson, having him out for 8 weeks could put them in serious trouble.

They play Fulham as their final game this season too.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,771
Location
here
Ok, I’ll have a go :lol:

DCL makes the most of initial contact as it is default action nowadays. Probably could’ve avoided him but took the easy route. Thus far not a pen but cunto flicks his foot at him in an attempt to trip even though he is already going over. Pen for that last action.... and for being a dipper
 
Last edited: