You explain unnecessary added on time then
Premier League Gameweek 26
- Thread starter top1whoisman
- Start date
Simple , bournemouth player faked an injury at the start of minimum added time after they wasted time all game on top of that and he saw fit to increas minimum added time because of their time wasting, ball was in the net before the 7th minute even ended. You're acting like we scored 15 minutes past the 90.
The pundits are always happy to praise “ known goal-scorers” and suggest that clubs having a dry spell need to hire them but I have never been impressed with some of the players they love. Iheanacho, Ings and Callum Wilson immediately spring to mind.
You actually think the FA have informed the refs to ensure that Arsenal win the league? It’s mental.
There were loads of stoppages. And Utd have won 100s of matches on the 93rd, 95th minute etc.
Leave the tin foil hat nonsense to the Bitters and Scousers mate.
You might do before this season is out
Explain how they keep on getting rub of the green
Welcome back! So nice to see these old posters who are all showing up again for some reason
When was the goal scored?
He will just go quiet now because knows that whistle should have blown so don't bother
you got me.. but I'm being respectful with all due respect.
Wout Faes is possibly the worst player I've ever seen.
Also, where is the consistency of booking keepers for time wasting?
I’ve lost count of how many similar situations I’ve seen with the whistle blowing unless a goal is scored directly from the corner. It was an arbitrary decision by the referee to allow one more attack.
Bournemouth were dumb letting them get the ball down there in the first place,apparently should have been closed down quicker too
20seconds to take a goalkick ffs
Why? You’re not City or Liverpool. Arsenal are winning the league. Cool. Odd turning up here instead of a Chelsea or Spurs forum where someone might actually be arsed with you winning the league.
Iheanacho is awful. How is he a professional footballer? 
Lets face it. Plenty of times that will happen and time is not added on to the already added injury time.
and plenty of times it does happen and time is added on.
Surely that's Brenton gone?
Was eating. In the same phase of play as the corner?
What's so odd about the corner being given bang on when the time was allowed including the 'injury', then the ref seeing out that attack before blowing?
That's what happens in the majority of games.
If the ball got cleared up the pitch then it was crossed back in or something, fair enough i'd see your point. But.. it didn't, it was literally within the exact same period of play.
Southampton tried their best to lose that
Jesus lighten up
They are dumb fecks giving you the ball
Aahh just embrace it. Arsenal opened the door today and then slammed it shut for the season so there’s a lot of emotion happening. Your team are lucky, var is on your side, the refs want you to win… yada yada. It’s you and City now.
Absolutely need to fecking win tomorrow.
Yeah because all of that is true but then you would understand because have been in your pocket last few seasons as well
Rarely.
What happens in majority of games is the whistle is blown as soon as it’s clear a goal will not be scored directly from the corner. It’s ok to admit it was a bad decision. Next bad decision might go against you and you’ll get the one after that. Nature of football
But it wasn't a bad decision. You're disagreeing over about 5-10 seconds of play.
The goal was scored in 97:10. The corner awarded at 96:45. The player went down for about 40-45 seconds.
It's literally fine margins, and the ball got cleared from the corner to the edge of the box from the corner, Nelson took 1 touch and hit it. It's not like it was recycled into another attack.
Combined with the fact Neto timewasted non stop all game, I think it's more than fair. Also add that we could have had a pen for handball, and there was encroachment for the 1st goal before kick off which VAR didn't catch, it all balanced out imo.
The outrage if this happened for Liverpool or United would lead to an emergency parliament session.
Literally just happened in the Southampton vs Leicester match.
You’re confused if you think I’m giving you an opinion. You don’t understand time added on in football for some reason.
Your attitude just reeks so i'll leave it there. In what world do you have a right to say you aren't giving someone an opinion?
I fully understand. It's the MINIMUM additional time for a reason. The player went down for 40 seconds. There were also probably other bits of time wasting in added time too. I think you're not really understanding but, each to their own.
Last edited:
Answer me this - do you actually believe the FA have had secret meetings with referees to ensure that Arsenal win the league?
Just say “yes” or “no”
Exactly, seems crazy football fans don't know stoppage time is a minimum anyways and then the Bournemouth player decided it was a good decision to waste time during the first minute of the stoppage time so it got added at the end.
Ref was good today and still getting stick. Pretty sure if he wanted Arsenal to win like posters on here think he would've just given one of the handballs as a penalty but instead he reffed it perfectly and gave none as all off them would've been harsh as hell in my opinion.
Bournemouth fans are less annoyed about the stoppage time than utd. They only seen to be bothered by how bad they think their manager is. Tells you everything really.
what everyone is missing is ben white offside for Zinchencko cross which led to the corner. Also watching the Brighton game Bowen gave away a penalty. I have seen about 5 of these against Rashford and Garancho in the last weeks and none were given. Refs are poor in our league both on and off the field.
So because refs do their job incorrectly in other games you’re having a meltdown because they actually followed the rules correctly? I applause your logic, good sir.
They didn't want us to make it 3 horse race
Who knows what goes on behind scenes