They have much more to fight than MacAllister's which shouldn't have been revoked.Makes it funnier if it's revoked again after what happened to McAllister last week
Premier League Gameweek 3
- Thread starter top1whoisman
- Start date
Klopp should have had a red too.
It's a foul it's not a clear cut chance. Yellow was fair. Even Newcastle players were surprised to see the red card.
- nickname of Miguel Almirón (born 1994), Paraguayan professional footballer as per Wikepedia
The coach has to make a change.
Your team is already in difficulty because of the red, take one for the team and go sit on the bench instead of acting annoyed for the cameras
So they should allow fouls on forwards who are through on goal. Fair enough mate but it sounds crap to me.
Please give it a rest
Vidic used to go into crunching slide tackles and those are the ones that should never be fouls let alone yellows and red. But they have never been able to simply kick through the man, sweep his legs from under him last man to get the ball. I played as an aggressive CB my whole career and that’s as clear a foul and red card as you’ll see. This as someone that champions greater referee leniency. Can only think you need to watch it again.
Certainly looks like it
No, it's a red. If it was inside the box, it could have been a penalty and yellow because there's a genuine challenge for the ball. It's not in the box, so that rule doesn't apply. It's a textbook red card, no room to debate it. 100% correct according to the rules of the sport.
Almost as if they don't peak on day one.
I don't know what it's going to take for Klopp to drop or sell TAA. He provides the one position for all opposition managers to target and Trent obliges everytime.
Bournemouth under Eddie Howe were way too open, soft and very naive.
He then spent time in Spain with Atletico Madrid and this is the result.
As someone else said, that doesn't count outside the box. It's a red card. Just accept it
It was a red, if he didn't kick through him he'd have been through on goal, hence he's the last defender
Why are people arguing over it? Is it because it seems harsh? Because it isn't, it's denying a potential likely goal.
Why are people arguing over it? Is it because it seems harsh? Because it isn't, it's denying a potential likely goal.
Yep exactly, but the way people on here have been going on about United you'd swear we are relegation fodder when so many have issues too.
How are media scousers and all things Liverpool lovers taking that sending off?
That's fine, but you don't call them it in commentaries. Did they say Giggsy, or Becks?
Tonali yes, the others no.
Why do some of you always need to remind us how shite our current players are when commenting on games that don't even involve United? Not like you don't have the entire United forum to do that.
So tedious.
So tedious.
I mean...what? It's an obvious, clear foul which denies a goalscoring opportunity. This was a red card twenty years ago and it's a red card now.
See, saying things like this is tempting fate.
After a dismal 20-21 where we gave Liverpool an out after losing 2-4 to them and Allison scored in another game on the last minute to give them top 4, everyone thought they are back to the grind but they almost won the quadruple next season.
Do not tempt fate, just hope they screw up. They are in the title race 100%
Yes, a clear sending off and should have been two by then with TAA
I wish we had Anthony Gordon instead of just Antony.
Yep exactly!
Simple explanation for red card: If you think that it’s a foul then it’s a certain red card. I think it’s an obvious foul but you can maybe argue that it isn’t a foul. What is a ridiculous argument is that the ref shouldn’t give a red for that.
Give over, Jesus Christ
We're exposing a few scouse sympathisers here.
They have not been hard done by. They've been very lucky that the ref bottles the second yellow for TAA. Then they have nothing to complain about for the clear red card.
They have not been hard done by. They've been very lucky that the ref bottles the second yellow for TAA. Then they have nothing to complain about for the clear red card.
Some twat on BBC text
An explanation for 2 correct decisions? Sure, the ref done his job well and followed the rules.
It happened last week with MacAllister which was an awful challenge. This will be revoked, only thing is Virgil went out insulting the referee so that won't help him.
T-shirts being printed already and a candle lit justice for Virgil vigil being organised for later.
Sadly for everyone bar City, Newcastle have been completely on the money with their coach, signings and setup.
Doesn't matter unless it's in the box.
Liverpool spent 100m+ million pounds in midfielders only to chuck the ball to the wingers .
It is hilariously bad how the team is fragmented and they commit 5 players to attack only to lose the ball and give Newcastle a freebie.
Disasterclass from Klop.
.It is hilariously bad how the team is fragmented and they commit 5 players to attack only to lose the ball and give Newcastle a freebie.
Disasterclass from Klop.
Think it’s just the case for Almiron. When he was at Atl United / MLS our home commentators always called him Miggy. The fans and social media also always used it when talking about him. Think it’s just carried on.
How is not a clear chance? He is thru into the box one on one against the GK.
Carragher embarrassing himself
Tonali isn't cheaper.
They have the money and got a good DOF in, not someone who is an ex player, but someone with great experience of the PL and the job.
People seriously think Trent's arm tap on Gordon's shoulder was a red