Watford have taken the lead. 
Premier League Gameweek 33-35
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
The only team that that squandered chances were actually Liverpool. They should have won by a much higher score.
Roy looks 25 years younger in those shades.
Completely different really. Schar kicks Milner. I'm a City and really want these feckers to drop points but that was a fair goal.
At worst it was unsporting they didn't put the ball out for an injury.
Southampton take lead against Palace. Romeu. 1-0.
The only thing we know is the VAR didn't think it a clear and obvious error. We have no idea whether he thought it was a red or yellow.
Or if it was used in the first place
VAR looks at everything. Its been stated multiple times. The VAR probably had a quick look and thought "Subjective decision, no intervention." He may even have thought "I'd have given a red for that" but as long as he didn't think "clear and obvious stonewall red" the on field decision stands.
VAR is used as a matter of course. How are we still talking like this after 3 years? It checks it as part of how VAR is used. It didn’t overturn the on-field decision so it goes without comment.
You would say that, I have never known or met a Liverpool fan that wasn't blatantly biased.
Thank you @mu4c_20le for pointing me to someone I actually can send the video that clearly shows Schar kicked milner not otherwise. Being unable to post it was killing me.
So Watford have decided now that they're dead and buried, to not be complete shite anymore. Really looking forward to having them and Norwich back in 2023/24. 
Or blind
Wilful ignorance.
Same as how some allege PEDs and then ignore stats that show that Liverpool cover less ground than their opponents and press less etc that are posted by their fellow United fans.
I'm assuming it's a coping mechanism but it comes across terribly.
Everyone saw that on tv. But it was milners scissor follow through that was the problem.
Oh gosh, so true. So, so true. My friend is a Liverpool fan. Prides himself as an objective, fact-adhering scientific type. That is, until something happens to benefit Liverpool, and all objectivity and rationality goes completely out the window.
Takes the opposite view. Thinks Liverpool are the ones hard done by decisions in almost every game.
Mane elbow in FA Cup? "Not a red for me".
Mane shove in the face? "Not a red for me."
Mane avoiding 2nd yellow at Stamford Bridge? "Not a 2nd yellow for me."
Mane stud at around thigh/knee height? "Not a red for me."
Showed him the Roma semi from 2018/19. None of the 3/4 clear penalties and/or potential 2nd yellows were sufficient enough for him to admit that decisions went his way.
There's literally never a situation where anything is deserved against his team.
On the contrary, every change of wind direction is some form of robbery for him.
Pickled is worse than most, Thiago could shotgun the opposition goal keeper and he'd think a booking was harsh.
Your supports says Racing Club fan but your words say Liverpool fan.
So will it be cull time coming up soon.
There’s folk on this website preoccupied with every decision that goes Liverpool’s way even in a game where it was barely a contest. Obsessive VAR talk and even weird stuff about doping. All this in the backdrop of most predicting Liverpool would finish behind United at the start of the season. Yet very little admission that this Liverpool side are excellent - just blinkered ref-chat.
But I’m the blind one? Ok.
I hope so, he and njred shouldn't have survived the last purge.
Joining this website in 2008. Very little cull-talk back then. I just got patronised and head pats.
Funny how it’s changed. Getting culled…?
VAR check for penalty to Brighton at Wolves.
Penalty to Brighton. McAllister to take. Hits the post.
Sorry that not buying into bizarre conspiracy theories vs Actual facts and statistics makes me a Liverpool fan.
Third penalty miss in a row for Brighton.
When did flying in with an outstretched leg and catching your opponent with a full sole of studs above the ankle become a yellow? I mean I understand there’s been a rule change since Keita got away with one against Chelsea, Fabinho one against City and Mané today. I just can’t remember when the rules were changed?
Nah you're definitely a Liverpool fan, even just going through your first 2/3 pages of your post history shows that, 95% of your posts are defending Liverpool
Sorry that not buying into bizarre conspiracy theories vs Actual facts and statistics makes me a Liverpool fan.
Goalkeeper is down low is he not? foot was dangling out for the ball rather than a full on stamp. There is obviously contact but every situation is different.
Football is a contact sport and sometimes these things happen. It's bordering a red but it's not quite enough for me.
This would be the perfect 'orange card' (yellow + 5/10 min sin bin) that football needs to introduce.
Watkins scores for Villa.
How do you reckon Mané’s wasn’t a red card? Outstretched leg, late in, studs on the knees of the opponent.
VAR for/against is useless anyway because a team can have terrible decisions called their way on the pitch but if VAR does nothing it doesn’t go on the table as a VAR call. For example, if Mané stays on after slapping a guy and then poking another in the eye and VAR is happy with a yellow card, then that doesn’t count as a decision for Liverpool. Had he been sent off for either of those incidents it would’ve counted as “calls against” Liverpool, but what would that have said about Liverpool being shafted by the refs? Absolutely nothing.
A team getting 20 VAR penalties in a season will have people believe that they are being favoured by the referees, while actually that team has had 20 clear and obvious errors called against them on the pitch and may have god knows how many calls against them that never went to VAR anyway.
Think Brighton got another penalty. Mac Allister to take again. 0-1.
Some balls on Macallister.
I'm not actually defending anything, I'm getting in to discussions around doping and conspiracy theory.Nah you're definitely a Liverpool fan, even just going through your first 2/3 pages of your post history shows that, 95% of your posts are defending Liverpool
I don't think there was a referring conspiracy theory when you were successful either.
I don't care if City or Liverpool win the league or champions league.
I've also defended Arteta and Tuchel at times , I don't think that means that I'm a Chelsea or Arsenal fan.
The probably thought they would score one eventually.
They don't call him the Scottish Messi for no reason.
He missed the first one earlier and took another, went the same corner. Not many people would have the bottle.
I know. I meant more they keep missing penalties, so one was bound to go in eventually. Where you put them is always a risk. He took the risk.
Craig Pawson is really a shit ref, haven't seen so much blind reffing before.
He's absolutely terrible.