Cina
full member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Messages
- 50,912
This is the worst thread on the Caf.
You included things such as Halo 5 and a Black Tusk game on your list. You've seen feck all of them! Ryse and Killer Instinct (with two characters on the screen) are 900p and 720p respectively, so much for great developers.Is it fanboyish? I listed the games, I know the developers behind them, I have seen the content for all the games I listed
I'm beginning to agree. Does that mean we "win" this thread? I still can't believe someone actually said thatThis is the worst thread on the Caf.
GoW is nothing like Ryse. It has deep combat, with the occasional QTE finisher on larger enemies.Visually, does it look shit I'm talking about - we've discussed the combat and game play to death and I agree completely (although, Weaste loves Santa Monica and God of War is the same - I wonder if he has ever played them though).
There's a river in Egypt... can't remember what it's called. Oh yea....afrocenticity; how? I've posted plenty of videos, articles and have talked about features/games of the PS4 in this thread. Weaste won't acknowledge anything good about the Xbox One.
Infact, I have probably informed of more positive PS4 in this thread than Weaste himself as, as he simply concentrates on bashing the Xbox.
I was talking comparatively. XBone in power is around the same distance from Wii U as PS4 is from XBone.Weaste says that the PS4 is gonna make Xbox One graphics look like a Wii U - PC graphics don't even do that, so why would PS4s?
I preferred it when he was trying to be neutral. Telling people what they should like (claiming those who don't agree arw fanboys) and bringing up high end PCs is laughable.There's a river in Egypt... can't remember what it's called. Oh yea....
I answered it.. I don't think games can get loads better. Obviously better textures and shadows and shit, but in all honesty I still go back to games from the start of the 360/PS3 cycle and think they look great. For people who really care about the small details maybe there's a big difference but not for me.You can't even answer a single question of mine that I've asked yoh at least twice. You are going at me about what Weaste said too, all because I've pointed out you are joking trying to compare the XB1 to high end PCs. I'm aware you've backtracked on that now challenged, but for god's sake don't tell me to read back when you keep dodging a simple question of mine. You are cracking up
Ryse the final executions are the QTEs and there have been articles out there saying how deep the combat is aswel as the reports to say the opposite. I'm waiting to see the reviews, I don't believe the combat will be up to standard but you can't knock its visuals and the story and cinematics seem interesting - but yeah, if the gameplay is bad then I won't buy it.GoW is nothing like Ryse. It has deep combat, with the occasional QTE finisher on larger enemies.
Scenery aside I think the character animations are pretty poor on Ryse. You'd expect the skyboxes to be pretty because most games have good looking backdrops now. With Ryse you can certainly tell it's been through numerous iterations and developers to get where it is. I predict a mediocre game, and seeing as you prize reviewers and developers opinion on games, I believe they will also state it's poor come review time.
All two of them?All Sony published games we know the resolution for are 1080.
Please, show me a high-end PC game and compare it to those Ryse graphics that would make people think Ryse looks shit? It's not possible.I preferred it when he was trying to be neutral. Telling people what they should like (claiming those who don't agree arw fanboys) and bringing up high end PCs is laughable.
Again, this is pointless until you actually answer my question.Please, show me a high-end PC and compare it to those Ryse graphics that would make people think Ryse looks shit? It's not possible.
PC Graphics are technically much better, with great detail and better textures/shaders - but that doesn't make Ryse look shit which is what I said from the start. Better, sure.. Much better, maybe. Enough to make Ryse seem graphically poor? Definitely not.
What question?Again, this is pointless until you actually answer my question.
So basically, like your opinion on the launch lineups, you have a low opinion of graphics. That's all well and good, but you are wrong if you think Ryse is even close to what can be achieved. It's a graphic standard from a few years ago! Just because it has shiny textures that please your eye, you think it's so great, but technically it isn't advanced at all. But no doubt you are going to miss the point and bang on about showing you againWhat question?
Why won't they get loads better? You've answered it for yourself, but I also added my opinion that I think graphics are at such a high that now it's mostly a case of showing the finer details and improving frame rates and the likes.
Games from 7 years ago are still really pleasing on the eye for me. The difference between high end PC games now and high end PC games 8 years ago is far lower than the difference between say 2005 and 98. And I'd imagine the difference in the next 7 years will be the same.
There's only so much you can do, the best games are already starting to look like movies.
To me, the graphics look great yeah. To lots of people, pretty much on every comments page/forum it's being discussed in.So basically, like your opinion on the launch lineups, you have a low opinion of graphics. That's all well and good, but you are wrong if you think Ryse is even close to what can be achieved. It's a graphic standard from a few years ago! Just because it has shiny textures that please your eye, you think it's so great, but technically it isn't advanced at all. But no doubt you are going to miss the point and bang on about showing you again
I think he needs a new TV, anything above 42" and the cracks start showing up...So basically, like your opinion on the launch lineups, you have a low opinion of graphics. That's all well and good, but you are wrong if you think Ryse is even close to what can be achieved. It's a graphic standard from a few years ago! Just because it has shiny textures that please your eye, you think it's so great, but technically it isn't advanced at all. But no doubt you are going to miss the point and bang on about showing you again
It could be the quality of the gifs you've put up... but like I say, Crysis 3 on my PC looks better.... this is s'posed to be next gen right?
I agreed long ago that PC graphics are better, that's not my point.It could be the quality of the gifs you've put up... but like I say, Crysis 3 on my PC looks better.... this is s'posed to be next gen right?
No feckin way . Name and shame.did some spastic actually say "win" this thread? Who was it? I'm betting not even Weaste or Cider said that Oh and it's no shock to see Alock slip back into full on fanboy mode, I knew you would at some point matey
When did I say that anybody else was a fanboy when it came to graphics? Ever?So basically Alock, if people don't agree with you they are fanboys and if they do you are right about the future of graphics. Post as many pics and .gifs as you are like, but that isn't technically impressive at all. Sure it has nice textures and has been made well, but you are talking absolute rubbish about graphics. Basically, you have gone into fanboy mode yourself and just cannot see it.
The gameplay footage of Ryse was; run towards enemy, block or dodge, light attack, hard attack, QTE. Not exactly deep combat. You seem to be focusing on the skybox graphics, which isn't a huge acheivement. The character models should be much better for a pioneering next gen game. Ryse looks like it could be running on current gen.Ryse the final executions are the QTEs and there have been articles out there saying how deep the combat is aswel as the reports to say the opposite. I'm waiting to see the reviews, I don't believe the combat will be up to standard but you can't knock its visuals and the story and cinematics seem interesting - but yeah, if the gameplay is bad then I won't buy it.
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!
Oh so now you further backtrack. I'll ask again, why do you think there hasn't been a game like looking like that before? And further to that, why do you think people thinks it looks stunning? Do you think it's technically more impressive than, say, Rage? Do you think a PC considered high end 2-3 years ago could run that better?When did I say that anybody else was a fanboy when it came to graphics? Ever?
All I've said is that no game can make Ryse look shit and nobody has disagreed except Weaste - who the whole point was in response to in the first place.
I don't know!No feckin way . Name and shame.
Cannot find that post but if true, it puts berry berry shrew post to shame.
Wasn't they also talking about trying to give the game more challenge? Or was that to do with when it was Kinect?The gameplay footage of Ryse was; run towards enemy, block or dodge, light attack, hard attack, QTE. Not exactly deep combat. You seem to be focusing on the skybox graphics, which isn't a huge acheivement. The character models should be much better for a pioneering next gen game. Ryse looks like it could be running on current gen.
No.I love all this "everyone else thinks it looks stunning" stuff Does that "win" this thread? It wasn't you that said that was it Alock?
I've talked about the combat and concerns over the gameplay hundreds of times in this thread so please..The gameplay footage of Ryse was; run towards enemy, block or dodge, light attack, hard attack, QTE. Not exactly deep combat. You seem to be focusing on the skybox graphics, which isn't a huge acheivement. The character models should be much better for a pioneering next gen game. Ryse looks like it could be running on current gen.
When did I EVER say that there has never been a game that looks like that? Never.Oh so now you further backtrack. I'll ask again, why do you think there hasn't been a game like looking like that before? And further to that, why do you think people thinks it looks stunning? Do you think it's technically more impressive than, say, Rage? Do you think a PC considered high end 2-3 years ago could run that better?
Looks awesome right.SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!
Do you have a problem with the difference is meanings between published and developed? If you are talking developed, then Microsoft only have Forza 5 on offer.All two of them?
When did I say you said any of those things? All you've done is bang on about "shit" this and Pc that. If you want to drop that aspect then fine. But if you want to keep talking about graphics and improvements then let's do, but you are completely wrong to suggest graphics will only improve in minor ways.No.
I've talked about the combat and concerns over the gameplay hundreds of times in this thread so please..
When did I EVER say that there has never been a game that looks like that? Never.
I never even said that there aren't games that look better at all.
I just said that no games make it look shit. I never backtracked.
A gaming PC from 2-3 years ago could run it better for sure, does that mean it looks bad? No. Dude, even the Wii U has games which look great, do you disagree?
Genius!Load of cutscene GIFs