Funny enough, I have a 75 inch TV. So yeah.
Did the memes hurt your feelings
Student loans should only be used for books and Xbox. What are you studying?Plenty of student loans coming in this year so I’m fine
I’ve just graduated in history but this is my teacher training year.
Why are you so obsessed with "memes" or what people say? Are you honestly more interested in having native 4K as opposed to reconstructed 4K with a higher framerate/better visual besides pixel count?
Most gamers sit fairly close to their TVs. I game at about a metre and a half from my 55 inch 4K tv. 1440p also looks like piss on 4K.
Surprising. Thought you were one of those who would sign up for a piss easy degree just so you can get your hands on a loan.
My point is if the rumours were about Xbox then people would be laughing it up just like 900p gate.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You didn't answer my question and you still seem to be more interested in "rumours" or what people might or might not say. Yeah I suspect there would be plenty of people talking shit if it was the other way around, but honestly who cares? People on the internet are shit. Anyway, a twitter account using terms like "fake 4K".
I personally disagree and am more than happy with 1440p on both my pc monitor and my tv. From other threads I've already noticed you have a lower tolerance for that, which is fair enough, everyone has to decide for themselves.
1080p 144+fps 24inch, the setup of gods or anyone that plays competitive shooters!
To be fair, I do. I went out and bought an xbox x just to play CoD at higher resolution than 1440p. Also, left Ghost of Tsushima and Last of Us 2 due to 1440p resolution. I’ve never actually played on a 1440p native monitor but to me, 1440p doesn’t upscale well to 4K. fecking 1st world problems eh? Remember marvelling at ps2 graphics like it was yesterday.You didn't answer my question and you still seem to be more interested in "rumours" or what people might or might not say. Yeah I suspect there would be plenty of people talking shit if it was the other way around, but honestly who cares? People on the internet are shit. Anyway, a twitter account using terms like "fake 4K".
I personally disagree and am more than happy with 1440p on both my pc monitor and my tv. From other threads I've already noticed you have a lower tolerance for that, which is fair enough, everyone has to decide for themselves.
Yeah because you’re getting a decent ppi on 24 inch monitor that runs 144mhz and has some sort of antialiasing solution. Looks a hell of a lot worse when you’re playing 1080p @ 60fps on a 4K tv with all the jaggies.
That's still four more games than the Xbox has Iol
Speaking of PS2, did you ever play TimeSplitters? Because if ever a game needed remaking it’s that.
Well the rumours are what are we discussing. That’s how fake 4k was brought up. Xbox doesn’t have the same problems, PS5 does according to them. That’s the point of the discussion. Not you being dismissive about native 4k because I don’t really care for your opinion on that. If I wanted it, I would have asked.You didn't answer my question and you still seem to be more interested in "rumours" or what people might or might not say. Yeah I suspect there would be plenty of people talking shit if it was the other way around, but honestly who cares? People on the internet are shit. Anyway, a twitter account using terms like "fake 4K".
I personally disagree and am more than happy with 1440p on both my pc monitor and my tv. From other threads I've already noticed you have a lower tolerance for that, which is fair enough, everyone has to decide for themselves.
What console did you play mass effect 1 and 2 on?
I'd much prefer consoles got over the 30 fps crap then resolution its disgusting jumping from one game as high as 240 down to 30.
I remember playing timesplitters 2 yeah. Was out for gamecube as well if remember correctly. Remember all the kids queuing up to play it GAME after school. Would definitely pick up a remake.
Well most people are fine with 30fps. I’d hazard a guess a lot of gamers wouldn’t be able to tell you what the hell you’re talking about. People are just happy with good aul motion blur set to 10 and 30fps and seriously cant see it changing. 3rd party games like AC will just pushing the graphical fidelity as much as they can at the cost of FPS. Of course, I agree, 30fps is absolutely honking when you go up to 60+ FPS and then down to 30 again.
It is. THQ Nordic got the rights to it and hired one of the old leads.
The bit in bold is a bit ironic, since it was you being dismissive about the idea that there might be others who genuinely don't care about native 4k and would only be saying it "because it's PS5". I'm not putting my own opinion above others, I was offering another point of view. You didn't ask for it but I offered it anyway, because we're on a forum and that's what it's for. But thanks for letting me know you didn't care for my opinion anyway.
Both, because it was possible to do so. Not sure what console I played The Last of Us, Uncharted, LBP, inFamous, MGS4, Ratchet and Clank and so forth on but I'm pretty sure it wasn't the one that had a 16% failure rate.
16% ? that’s being generous.
Oh really? The new new one must be close to release now.Oh @VeevaVee i tried looking for an update on my Xbox it’s up to date and the UI still looks fecking gash.
At least Modern Warfare looks nice and crisp. Can’t say the same for PS4 pro mind.
Ah, sorry. I wasn't able to check the internet because my Xbox RROD'd.
Im not sure what’s going on. I’ve got lots of little square tabs at the front. Certainly not like in that screenshot which looked a lot more palatable.
You played on the Xbox. Thank you pigeon for confirming. I knew there was some good in you.
We were discussing a rumour before you came in being dismissive of native 4k. Remember it’s a rumour, it might not even be true. But currently rumours are what this threads are based on considering there is nothing concrete out there on any of the consoles.
Halo single player is 4k 60fps. Multiplayer will be something like 1080p and 120fps. Definitely not 4k.
Yeah but you won’t have as much POWER
Ah fair enough. If RDNA 2 have something similar to DLSS then they could achieve 120hz at some sort of dynamic resolution that definitely looks comparable to native 4K. Personally I don’t care, as long as it looks crisp and with good visuals.
I think it’s a bit of tongue-in-cheek banter in this thread rather then full on meltdowns that nerds on IGN forums might have. Thats the way I see it anyway.
More power isn’t for some people like you as you are a plain man.
how dare you assume there's any goodness in me whatsoever, mate.There will be multiplatform titles where Series X will be able to hold a steady 60 fps at 4k and the PS5 won't, that's a given considering the power difference. But equally, there will be loads of titles where both will struggle to get 60fps at native 4k and once we get past the cross-gen period, I suspect it will be nearly all games, since even a 2080 Ti struggles with 4k60 on the higher settings in the best looking titles. That's not me being dismissive about native 4k, that's me being realistic about the situation and saying that going for a reconstructed 4k (which can be very impressive and virtually indistinguishable from native in some cases) is the best compromise. And you will still get the full benefit of seeing such games in action on your 75" 4k tv, even though it's not native.
Let’s get one thing straight, we are not mates, mate.
