Refs & VAR 2020/2021 Discussion

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
Was there not a handball on Zinchenko vs Martial? Looked like a clear handball on the replay. Don't think VAR even reviewed it. They never showed a replay of Martial's handball claim when he set himself up for a volley with a touch inside the box. That looked really suspicious but I haven't seen any replay or close up. Anyone have the timestamp so that we can look at it?
 

One Night Only

Prison Bitch #24604
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
30,797
Location
Westworld
Was there not a handball on Zinchenko vs Martial? Looked like a clear handball on the replay. Don't think VAR even reviewed it. They never showed a replay of Martial's handball claim when he set himself up for a volley with a touch inside the box. That looked really suspicious but I haven't seen any replay or close up. Anyone have the timestamp so that we can look at it?
I thought when Martial went down he was clipped by one of the two defenders, not the one the commentators mentioned. Didn't see the replays though so it could have been a dive.
 

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
I thought when Martial went down he was clipped by one of the two defenders, not the one the commentators mentioned. Didn't see the replays though so it could have been a dive.
There was a slight touch but so little that the dive was deemed unnecessary.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,029
Location
Canada
My understanding of VAR...
  1. VAR isn't allowed to over turn free kicks, only whether there should be a red card or not, and if there should be a pen or not. So the only 2 options there should have been a United free kick with a Brady red card, or a United free kick with no Brady red if Shaw was deemed to have fouled the guy/Brady's wasn't a red. Either way, Shaw's challenge was not a foul, so it should've been a red.
  2. Never a foul in any area of the pitch. Absolute scandal to disallow that.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,291
Baffles me that they need three minutes and send the ref over to look at a tackle that could only ever be a yellow and a free kick but no need to see whether it was actually a foul on the goal. Never seen VAR being used to give free kicks before either.
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
My understanding of VAR...
  1. VAR isn't allowed to over turn free kicks, only whether there should be a red card or not, and if there should be a pen or not. So the only 2 options there should have been a United free kick with a Brady red card, or a United free kick with no Brady red if Shaw was deemed to have fouled the guy/Brady's wasn't a red. Either way, Shaw's challenge was not a foul, so it should've been a red.
  2. Never a foul in any area of the pitch. Absolute scandal to disallow that.
They can check the buildup to the red card, which they did and, unfortunately for us, Shaw's challenge is a yellow card tackle any day of the week.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,034
Location
Denmark
Shaw's was investigated as a possible red card so I assume that's how they were able to check it. It was a clear foul (though not a red) and I think the referee handled a complex situation well.

The Maguire foul was a total joke.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,029
Location
Canada
They can check the buildup to the red card, which they did and, unfortunately for us, Shaw's challenge is a yellow card tackle any day of the week.
OK but you can't overturn a free kick, and no red card was given. If he gave a red, then you can change. A yellow was given. They can't over turn. The only check is if it should be a red card (with build up included), but not the actual free kick/yellow card because no pen or red card was given.

There's an argument that if Shaw did a red card tackle that would take precedence. But it's never in a million years anything more than a foul, and IMO not even a foul (but that's irrelevant). If it's not a red, then they can't call it back as a foul.
 

BD

technologically challenged barbie doll
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
23,194
I presume there's no chance of VAR fecking off?

It hasn't removed ambiguity from decisions, or even made decisions better. It's just made it even more frustrating when an obvious decision goes against you.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,905
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Without getting into the specifics of what went on there I would like to put forward the idea that VAR is a load of steaming piss that ruined those 45 minutes as a piece of entertainment and left a far worse taste in the mouth than any poor refereeing performance pre-VAR.

Re the specifics, Maguire didn’t foul his man. Obviously. That was a terrible decision, reviewed by VAR and not corrected.

You had one job, VAR...
 

NinjaFletch

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
19,818
OK but you can't overturn a free kick, and no red card was given. If he gave a red, then you can change. A yellow was given. They can't over turn. The only check is if it should be a red card (with build up included), but not the actual free kick/yellow card because no pen or red card was given.

There's an argument that if Shaw did a red card tackle that would take precedence. But it's never in a million years anything more than a foul, and IMO not even a foul (but that's irrelevant). If it's not a red, then they can't call it back as a foul.
I think the problem is that they've decided it is a clear and obvious error and Brady should be sent off. Once that decision is made, they check the build up and there's the foul.

It's a stupid area of inconsistency, if they hadn't have checked it it would have been a booking and our free kick, but they end up with the right decision.
 

UnitedChampionsAgain

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
302
The refs either blind or a cheat, maybe both. Bloody scandalous decisions throughout the entire half!
Dyche still yapping even though every decision has gone their way. Crazy man!!
Rashford, wake up for f#ck sake, there's a match on!
 

cvb

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
59
Location
Boston, MA. Formerly Hyde.
Supports
City
OK but you can't overturn a free kick, and no red card was given. If he gave a red, then you can change. A yellow was given. They can't over turn. The only check is if it should be a red card (with build up included), but not the actual free kick/yellow card because no pen or red card was given.

There's an argument that if Shaw did a red card tackle that would take precedence. But it's never in a million years anything more than a foul, and IMO not even a foul (but that's irrelevant). If it's not a red, then they can't call it back as a foul.
Here's the process that I think Friend followed:

After seeing both incidents again, he realized that Brady should be sent off for Denial of a Goalscoring Opportunity. Because it is not violent conduct, that presumptive red card can be reviewed to see if anything occurred the build-up that would invalidate the move which led to the goalscoring opportunity that Brady denied. Shaw is adjudged to have committed a foul in the build up, which is awarded along with a yellow card, invalidating any card for Brady.

Edit: @NinjaFletch said the same thing at the same time as I did.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,950
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Without getting into the specifics of what went on there I would like to put forward the idea that VAR is a load of steaming piss that ruined those 45 minutes as a piece of entertainment and left a far worse taste in the mouth than any poor refereeing performance pre-VAR.

Re the specifics, Maguire didn’t foul his man. Obviously. That was a terrible decision, reviewed by VAR and not corrected.

You had one job, VAR...
How anyone can watch that half and think VAR is a good idea is beyond me.
 

Moonwalker

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
3,821
Shaw's was investigated as a possible red card so I assume that's how they were able to check it. It was a clear foul (though not a red) and I think the referee handled a complex situation well.

The Maguire foul was a total joke.
That's pretty much how I see it, although I think they can check for a foul in the build up even if it's not a red card offense. Can't review every yellow card incident on its own though, rightly.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,034
Location
Denmark
Without getting into the specifics of what went on there I would like to put forward the idea that VAR is a load of steaming piss that ruined those 45 minutes as a piece of entertainment and left a far worse taste in the mouth than any poor refereeing performance pre-VAR.

Re the specifics, Maguire didn’t foul his man. Obviously. That was a terrible decision, reviewed by VAR and not corrected.

You had one job, VAR...
Also this. Still amazes me how anyone can feel football has been improved by this.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,675
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Still not sure about the Shaw/Brady ordeal. I didn't think VAR gave free kicks for fouls in the build up to a VAR reviewed incident. I also thought the only card that could be given from a VAR was a red. I've not seen a decision reversed and a booking given the other way before. But Shaw plays the ball, the follow through looks bad if you freeze it on Shaw's foot looking like he makes studs-up contact, but he actually doesn't, it goes behind the Burnley player's leg. But VAR froze it on that more than once.

Maguire's goal was a joke decision though. Commentator said VAR looked at it, but it was very quick. The defender didn't even go for the header, does that mean Maguire isn't allowed to either?
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,225
Location
Targaryen loyalist
The Maguire goal is baffling. That is a textbook header.

How is an guy like him supposed to win a header in a packed box without getting physical with a defender? It is impossible.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,291
What’s being ignored in this is that Brady got away with a knee high tackle with no yellow card. If Shaw’s a booking so is that.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
I don’t think VAR was the issue there. In Shaw’s case they arrived at the right conclusion; it was just a mind-bender getting there.

The Maguire decision is also impossible to overturn given the role VAR currently plays. There is contact and therefore it isn’t a clear and obvious error by the book. Obviously, it is an error by the common sense rule book we expect referees to follow: a frankly terrible decision by Friend. Awful refereeing.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,291
I presume it’s sliding doors bullshit, where that timeline never happened once Shaw conceded the free. A bit like when Van Dijk got his knee wrecked.
Yeah, that’s a joke though. They’re sitting on Sky talking about how lucky Shaw and how bad a tackle it is but Brady’s tackle wasn’t just denying a goal scoring opportunity, it was high and reckless with no intent of getting the ball.
 

Cpt Negative

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
3,290
I presume it’s sliding doors bullshit, where that timeline never happened once Shaw conceded the free. A bit like when Van Dijk got his knee wrecked.
Amazing considering every ref knows reckless tackles can still be given as a red if the game has stopped
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,905
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I don’t think VAR was the issue there. In Shaw’s case they arrived at the right conclusion; it was just a mind-bender getting there.

The Maguire decision is also impossible to overturn given the role VAR currently plays. There is contact and therefore it isn’t a clear and obvious error by the book. Obviously, is an error by the normal rule bookc and a terrible decision by Friend. Awful refereeing.
What book is this? Since when do two players brushing against each other jumping for a header remove the possibility of a bad refereeing error?
 

Manny

Grammar Police
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
4,848
What a joke! Shaw gets plenty of the ball and then Cavani doesn't even get the freekick up the other end, never mind the red :lol:

Now Redknapp is acting like Shaw should have been sent off
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,029
Location
Canada
I think the problem is that they've decided it is a clear and obvious error and Brady should be sent off. Once that decision is made, they check the build up and there's the foul.

It's a stupid area of inconsistency, if they hadn't have checked it it would have been a booking and our free kick, but they end up with the right decision.
That's fine to think it should be a red and do a check. They can't end up changing a free kick and yellow to another free kick and yellow though, that's the point. There are 3 options for VAR to conclude - a red for Brady with United free kick, a red for Shaw with Burnley free kick, or keep the yellow for Brady with a United free kick. They literally aren't allowed to change it the way they did.