Reserves vs Liverpool this evening

charleysurf

Obnoxious, abusive bellend who is best ignored
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
16,298
You're being a bit hard on Dudgeon, he was excellent for the Academy last season, and in the reserves games he's played this season.
He just seemed to give the ball away for fun. The worst was when he seemed to back heel it from the sideline into the path of a Liverpool player outside the box. Maybe he does have a lot more composure in him than he showed tonight. I hope so for his sake.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,297
Location
Hope, We Lose
Go on then. Name me 15 strikers who are 6'0 or over who have better technique than Macheda.

I'm sure you'll be able to do that with ease with not a single questionable inclusion on said list, as Macheda is such an average player apparently.
 

RedPhil1957

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2003
Messages
5,609
Location
lincs.
I do hope all the feckwits who populate the matchday forum don't start ruining the reserve/academy discusions with their crap posts!
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,032
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I do hope all the feckwits who populate the matchday forum don't start ruining the reserve/academy discusions with their crap posts!
:lol:

Bang goes the last safe haven on the caf!

Disappointing result last night. The Liverpool lads just looked that bit bigger and stronger. Given the amount of chances we created we could easily have won the game. Macheda's back-heel should have counted and on another day, Welbeck would have finished at least one of those headed chances.

He's been discussed a lot in recent weeks but I thought Eikrem was arguably the most accomplished player on the pitch. I'm not sure who he reminds me of more, a young David Beckham or a young Darren Fletcher. Either way he's a class act and no mistake.

King looks really promising too and Welbeck had his usual moments of brilliance. I think the only thing missing was a bit more muscle in midfield and we'll be a better side when James gets back from international duty. When one or other of the Da Silvas starts playing again we'll also look a lot more potent going forwards.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,747
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
:lol:

Bang goes the last safe haven on the caf!

Disappointing result last night. The Liverpool lads just looked that bit bigger and stronger. Given the amount of chances we created we could easily have won the game. Macheda's back-heel should have counted and on another day, Welbeck would have finished at least one of those headed chances.
Agreed.

He's been discussed a lot in recent weeks but I thought Eikrem was arguably the most accomplished player on the pitch. I'm not sure who he reminds me of more, a young David Beckham or a young Darren Fletcher. Either way he's a class act and no mistake.
IMO he is some kind of hybrid of the two.

King looks really promising too and Welbeck had his usual moments of brilliance. I think the only thing missing was a bit more muscle in midfield and we'll be a better side when James gets back from international duty. When one or other of the Da Silvas starts playing again we'll also look a lot more potent going forwards.
True.
 

samabachan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,896
Location
Football is about glory, it is about doing things
:lol:

Bang goes the last safe haven on the caf!

Disappointing result last night. The Liverpool lads just looked that bit bigger and stronger. Given the amount of chances we created we could easily have won the game. Macheda's back-heel should have counted and on another day, Welbeck would have finished at least one of those headed chances.

He's been discussed a lot in recent weeks but I thought Eikrem was arguably the most accomplished player on the pitch. I'm not sure who he reminds me of more, a young David Beckham or a young Darren Fletcher. Either way he's a class act and no mistake.

King looks really promising too and Welbeck had his usual moments of brilliance. I think the only thing missing was a bit more muscle in midfield and we'll be a better side when James gets back from international duty. When one or other of the Da Silvas starts playing again we'll also look a lot more potent going forwards.
Eikrem was good in the last half hour or so but I thought he was dreadful before that. Wasn't up for the battle at all.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,032
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Eikrem was good in the last half hour or so but I thought he was dreadful before that. Wasn't up for the battle at all.
Bit harsh. It wasn't so much not up for the battle as getting completely out-muscled. He looked like a slender wee boy playing against grown men. Which was kind of what he was.

He still looked classy on the ball though. Even when he was losing the physical battle.
 

charleysurf

Obnoxious, abusive bellend who is best ignored
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
16,298
Bit harsh. It wasn't so much not up for the battle as getting completely out-muscled. He looked like a slender wee boy playing against grown men. Which was kind of what he was.

He still looked classy on the ball though. Even when he was losing the physical battle.
I don't think his passing was qute good enough to make up for the fact that he's not the biggest. If he's always going to be out-muscled then he's really got to be almost perfect with his passing if he's going to catch Fergie's eye.
 

Decotron

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
28,823
Location
I am not a man........I am Cantona
IMO the reserves just had one of those nights when things don't go your way. They will learn loads from it.
agreed. I only saw the first 60mins but literally every bounce of the ball went their way. I think our team is far better than theres, as you said it was just one of those nights.

What did you make of Corrie Evans, looking more and more like hes destined to play as a defender.

its easy to complain about Eikrem but I was still impressed, he'd stand out even more in the first team imo.
 

Decotron

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
28,823
Location
I am not a man........I am Cantona
I don't think his passing was qute good enough to make up for the fact that he's not the biggest. If he's always going to be out-muscled then he's really got to be almost perfect with his passing if he's going to catch Fergie's eye.
The size thing is irrelevant, the lad has grown like fook over the last year and I believe hes expected to be well over 6ft!

Because hes so creative hes gona always give the ball away compared to his teammates. We missed Matt James in a big way last night. I reckon if he was playing we would have won.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,032
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I don't think his passing was qute good enough to make up for the fact that he's not the biggest. If he's always going to be out-muscled then he's really got to be almost perfect with his passing if he's going to catch Fergie's eye.
He's not always going to be out-muscled though, is he? He's grown something like 3 inches in the last year, no wonder he's looking a bit slight at the moment.

His passing is one of his greatest strengths IMO. It was a wee bit off in the first half when our whole team looked rattled but the quality of his passing shone through by the end of the game.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Ibrahimovics attitude is not that poor. And his technique is supreme.

I am not convinced by Machedas talent. He may be a natural goalscorer, but the rest of his play is poor. Such an average player, except his goalscoring instincts.

No one can deny that he thinks and acts as if he is already bigtime. Tonight he was faced infront of 3 defenders, with King free in space, but ignored him and sliced his shot wide. King had his arms up in the air, not aggressively, but what most players would do. Macheda, Im sure said 'feck off...' in a quite aggressive, cnutish way.

I hope we dont see him in the first team this season. Never, actually.
I thought Kiko's general play was as good as we'd seen. He did well I thought. He deserved a goal certainly

The example you give - yes he could have passed it but for me as a striker it's passing the buck. I don't blame him really. Strikers want goals.

If kiko had of scored, who would have complained?

There was one part where kiko was through, saw the defender was catching him and tried to backheel it across.

It's not like he always ignores his team mates
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Still no sign of Petrucci?
I wouldn't be surprised if he returns to the academy and later in the season get's a chance in the reserves. He's missed a lot of football and with norwood and brady getting chances I think we're mixing it up a little.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Ekeke kikos technique is hit and miss. Rossi had great technique. If you super imposed his ability onto kiko and added a touch more pace, he's be incredible.

Hi's technique yesterday was very good but it's the consistancy at the minute I reckon.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,297
Location
Hope, We Lose
Ekeke kikos technique is hit and miss. Rossi had great technique. If you super imposed his ability onto kiko and added a touch more pace, he's be incredible.

Hi's technique yesterday was very good but it's the consistancy at the minute I reckon.
Which comes from being a bit raw and inexperienced. He's capable of fantastic technique and at his age, was Ruud's technique any better? I doubt it. He's clearly not average.
 

datura

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
11,330
Location
A substandard bag of meat and bones.
He's been discussed a lot in recent weeks but I thought Eikrem was arguably the most accomplished player on the pitch. I'm not sure who he reminds me of more, a young David Beckham or a young Darren Fletcher. Either way he's a class act and no mistake.
Even when his radar was off in the first half he was trying to spread the play and looking to get the ball down and play. It wasn't easy as Liverpool were closing the ball down very quickly and there was little space to work in and our movement was pretty poor.

When it opened up after the sending off he had a bit more time and space to work in and was the one player that looked consistently like he would creat anything. He's still very much a work in progress, but the talent is evident.
 

samabachan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,896
Location
Football is about glory, it is about doing things
Bit harsh. It wasn't so much not up for the battle as getting completely out-muscled. He looked like a slender wee boy playing against grown men. Which was kind of what he was.

He still looked classy on the ball though. Even when he was losing the physical battle.
Scholesy wouldn't have been put off by the fact they were twice his size, he would have kicked feck out of them. I wouldn't have minded a bit of aggression from Eikrem.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,032
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Scholesy wouldn't have been put off by the fact they were twice his size, he would have kicked feck out of them. I wouldn't have minded a bit of aggression from Eikrem.
Fletch was once a bit of a lightweight pansy who only got aggressive when he finally filled out a bit. Eikrem reminds me of him a lot.

That's a good thing, by the way.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Which comes from being a bit raw and inexperienced. He's capable of fantastic technique and at his age, was Ruud's technique any better? I doubt it. He's clearly not average.
who saw ruud at 18? I didn't. We tried to buy ruud when he was 22 - I doubt at 18 Ruud was that bad

Kiko can be average and he can be good - that's consistancy which I pointed out and you pointed out - which means we agree on that.
 

PS18

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2004
Messages
2,357
Location
Ruud ftw
Don't think there's any issue with Macheda's technique at all, surprised people keep banging on about it. For his age, his physique and the type of player he is, it's more than adequate (at worst).
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,278
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
It was a weird performance in many ways.

I think what most a lot of people miss was our formation. Ole clearly played 433 or even 424 on occasions. From corners and free kicks that Liverpool had, he was yelling at Welbeck and King to stay out wide on the half way line and Macheda to push up too.

That meant that that Liverpool's defenders stayed back of course....but we only had Tosic, Evans and Eikrem helping the defence and trying to make breakaways.

Given those tactics it was always going to be a very tough battle in midfield. I thought Corry did well defensively as normal but his passing and creativity were way off. The forwards needed much better service.

Eikrem was head and shoulders our best player on the pitch and the only player who really looked like opening something up. His range of passing was Beckhamesque as pointed out by Pogue in one of his posts. There was one pass that was outstanding and if Paul Scholes had executed it everyone would have been raving.

As far as the defence is concerned.....Joe Dudgeon has been ill for a couple of weeks and lost a bit of weight. He wasn't match fit and he had a poor game by his high standards. Anyone judging him on this performance alone should see him regularly before making generalisations. David Gray had a good game and you know what you will get with him every game. 100% commitment! Chester and De Laet had a couple of 'moments'....one of which led to their goal. Zieler was at fault as well and I wish he would come off his line more often and more positively.

In terms of the other four......Tosic is brilliant on the ball but then gives it away. He should be taking the mick out of defenders at this level! Very disappointing.

Josh King looks a real player and he was impressive last night without getting any real chances on goal. He is strong and direct, a real handful for defenders. Given his age he looks a cracking prospect. Lets hope he stays clear of injury.

Macheda......in the last four games I have watched him in....he has done very little in the first half and then comes into the game more in the second. The Italian u-21 coach (Mancini) said that he needs to grow up in terms of maturity on the pitch and attitude in general. It is possibly a good shout. He didn't do that much to impress and on that performance doesn't deserve a place in the League Cup next week. He needs to work much harder.

Danny Welbeck is clearly one of the most gifted footballers at the club. But once again he had a poor game.....taking way too many touches and then losing it or giving the ball away. I can't remember him playing one first time ball last night. A few people next to me in the crowd actually screamed at him "why are you slowing the game down?". It was a fair indication of how he was playing......getting the ball......taking 5/6 touches...beating two or three players....then going backwards and giving a pass back to where we started. Very frustrating!

I think in hindsight.....we had 7/8 players trying at least to play as a team and 2/3 others trying to play as individuals. When those 2/3 individuals are all up front, then it makes it harder for the midfield to create and makes it very unattractive forward play to watch.

I think for once this season Ole got his tactics wrong with Eikrem the only true midfielder on the pitch. I know James was away with England.....but Norwood was on the bench and should have come on at some point. I don't know where Sam Hewson was?

Maybe the real lessons learned will be by Solskjaer as much as any of the players.
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,278
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
Petrucci

To the question about Petrucci......

This has come up in one post or another every few days for the last few months. I have given the same answer each time.

He is expected back sometime in October if he recovers as expected.

As it is only mid-September........then he isn't fit yet!
 

datura

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
11,330
Location
A substandard bag of meat and bones.
Good to have you back mujac and a fair summing up of the game, interesting that we were looking to play with 3 upfront.

I think King has looked excellent in every game he's played this season, his hold up play and touch under pressure was excellent against 2 tall, physical defenders. On current form he warrants a place in the team against Wolves more than either Welbeck or Macheda.
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,278
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
Whats his injury?
He has had growing pains for over six months.

You can never tell when they will start and stop.

At first it affected the muscles in his groin and now it is with his hip. As I understand it.....the muscles/tendons/ligaments grow at a different rate than the bone.

So if he shoots up two inches in height.....his tendons can't cope and it damages muscles and tissues when he runs or over stretches etc

This is clearly NOT a medical overview but an generalisation about what happens and why it take so long to recover as I understand it.

Josh King had similar problems last year (as well as an ankle injury too).

Before that both Luke Steels and Phil Bardsley actually had to wear a back brace to help them. Apparently it can be quite serious.
 

Mr. MUJAC

Manchester United Youth Historian
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
6,278
Location
Walter Crickmer started it all...
I dunno, I didn't watch the reserves back then but I was under the impression he was a good, solid all round midfielder at that level.
Fletcher wasn't aggressive as a kid but was much stronger than Eikrem. Fletch could run the show though and his range of passing was very classy.

I don't understand people on the main forum saying he can't pass.....he has always been able to do it.

People always see what they want to see.

Give Magnus time though.
 

samabachan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
9,896
Location
Football is about glory, it is about doing things
Fletcher wasn't aggressive as a kid but was much stronger than Eikrem. Fletch could run the show though and his range of passing was very classy.

I don't understand people on the main forum saying he can't pass.....he has always been able to do it.

People always see what they want to see.

Give Magnus time though.
Thanks. And don't get me wrong I like Eikrem, I've always said he's a good player and needs time and patience but I just felt for such a small lad he may well need a bit of extra aggression to make up for his physique. I don't think it was a coincidence though that when he picked it up and his passing started to hit the mark the team looked a lot, lot better.