Vidyoyo
The bad "V"
0.03% mortality. I like those odds.
Also says here I'm 24. Should probably use that from now on (I'm 30).
0.03% mortality. I like those odds.
Osterholm was effectively asserting this months ago. He said it is primarily spread by breathing in the virus as a pose to touch.The dutch health authority were reported on the news as saying, the chance of catching covid in the outdoors is virtually nil. Offices, busses, trams, airco, trains, elevators is where its at. UK had 2 meters and we 1.5, UK is a mess, we're ok.
My assumption has been, based on nothing really, that outdoors is pretty safe.... people naturally stay a certain distance apart when outside. Especially in Europe/US where its not as densely populated like parts of Asia.The dutch health authority were reported on the news as saying, the chance of catching covid in the outdoors is virtually nil. Offices, busses, trams, airco, trains, elevators is where its at. UK had 2 meters and we 1.5, UK is a mess, we're ok.
Please tell me that is a speech to text fail and you didn't just type that.Osterholm was effectively asserting this months ago. He said it is primarily spread by breathing in the virus as a pose to touch.
We are a country the size of wales with a population of 17+ million. Wales has 3 million, thats a lot.My assumption has been, based on nothing really, that outdoors is pretty safe.... people naturally stay a certain distance apart when outside. Especially in Europe/US where its not as densely populated like parts of Asia.
If they start opening playlots for kids, it wont be safe just because its outside.
Mass gatherings outside wthout masks probably wont be safe either (protests/concerts .. )
But I'd assume going out for a walk or crossing someone on the street shouldnt be a huge worry ..
I also saw this video
In what context?Is it socially accepted yet that this is something we're gonna have to live with as an inconvenience?
I can't accept that we aren't even trying to eradicate the virus in this country.Is it socially accepted yet that this is something we're gonna have to live with as an inconvenience?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Is it ever ok to say "serves them right for being so stupid"?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
@Carolina Red - How goes preparation / planning in your neck of the woods?
There's almost no risk from passing someone in the street, even if you get pretty close - it's too short an exposure, and air movement will disperse most of the droplets very rapidly.My assumption has been, based on nothing really, that outdoors is pretty safe.... people naturally stay a certain distance apart when outside. Especially in Europe/US where its not as densely populated like parts of Asia.
If they start opening playlots for kids, it wont be safe just because its outside.
Mass gatherings outside wthout masks probably wont be safe either (protests/concerts .. )
But I'd assume going out for a walk or crossing someone on the street shouldnt be a huge worry ..
I also saw this video
I think a face shield would do the same job as long as it's on correctly. Mask + shield is just extra protection which should be worn by people who deal with many people.Can I use a face shield instead of a mask when I'm outdoors like when walking my dog?
Also will a mask+shield combo provide more protection in general or should I wear just the mask?
If you're out walking your dog in open spaces, and not approaching other people, you can likely do whatever you like. Indoors, a mask is better than a shield, as the momentum of your breath will carry droplets out and around the sides of a shield pretty easily. Adding a shield on top of a mask is probably not conveying any additional benefit.Can I use a face shield instead of a mask when I'm outdoors like when walking my dog?
Also will a mask+shield combo provide more protection in general or should I wear just the mask?
The Dutch Health Org said the chances of catching it in the open air were virtually nil.There's almost no risk from passing someone in the street, even if you get pretty close - it's too short an exposure, and air movement will disperse most of the droplets very rapidly.
We already know that.The Dutch Health Org said the chances of catching it in the open air were virtually nil.
Not having a Twitter account, I looked for some poetic deeper meaning in that.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
65% in the US do it and they had 60k new cases yesterday.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We're a country of idiots.
I'd generally agree on the provision that you're not right up in someone's face, where you could potentially be breathing straight into their mouth.The Dutch Health Org said the chances of catching it in the open air were virtually nil.
Your own speculation or based on anything in particular?https://news.sky.com/story/coronavi...if-covid-19-cases-spike-poll-reveals-12019957
According to polls 70% of Brits are uncomfortable going to the pub while 83% would back a second lockdown, although i imagine that number would decrease quite rapidly once they realize there's (likely) little to no furlough support second time round and we could come out the other side a 3rd world country.
Locking down local flare up's is the right balance, there's some areas in the country that's been on single figure weekly cases (at worst) for ages, locking down those areas again would be ridiculous.
Educated prediction based on just 1 month of lockdown causing a 20% fall, there's only so many times any country can survive such catastrophic hits.Your own speculation or based on anything in particular?
It would have been much higher than 20% without the furlough scheme.Educated prediction based on just 1 month of lockdown causing a 20% fall, there's only so many times any country can survive such catastrophic hits.
Speculation, to say we'll be a 3rd world country is a bit OTT.Your own speculation or based on anything in particular?
Must be like the feckin tardis insideSomeone tweeted who lives on that estate and confirmed that it really is a very small house.
School districts are starting to release plans. I saw one released yesterday that says they’re planning on assigning kids to an A/B schedule, so 50% attend on Monday/Wednesday and 50% on Tuesday/Thursday with Friday as an eLearning only day. Only 8 or 9 kids in a classroom. Teachers required to wear masks and cannot walk around the room.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
@Carolina Red - How goes preparation / planning in your neck of the woods?
Some of those countries most likely won't allow Brits anyway, others rely on our tourism for their economy.English travellers will be free to take their much-longed-for summer holidays without facing a 14-day quarantine under plans being announced on Friday by the Government.
The Transport Secretary will publish a list of more than 60 countries where the Government proposes to abandon its quarantine policy and open up the borders to free travel.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/07/03/full-list-countries-exempt-uk-travel-quarantine/A preparatory draft list of 55 of the countries, seen by The Telegraph, includes these:
Latvia, San Marino, Poland, Austria, Norway, Italy, Hungary, Turkey, Switzerland, Netherlands, Liechtenstein, Cyprus, Malta, Iceland, Slovakia, Serbia, Germany, Luxembourg, Lithuania, Reunion, Australia, Finland, St Pierre and Miquelon, Andorra, New Zealand, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Gibraltar, Spain, Greece, St Kitts and Nevis, Martinique, Monaco, St Lucia, Canada, Wallis and Futuna, Trinidad and Tobago, Montenegro, Bermuda, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, Vietnam, Brunei, French Polynesia, Denmark, Belgium, Estonia, France, Malaysia, Ireland, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas and Barbados.
feck. My bad. I always thought it was that instead of "as opposed to." Apparently it is a common mistake.Please tell me that is a speech to text fail and you didn't just type that.
Run by them, certainly.We're a country of idiots.