Selling Fred was a mistake

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,369
Our only high-energy number 8 shouldn't have been sold and definitely not while keeping the likes of McTominay.

The hope is Hannibal could replace him but today's involvement seems more like desperation than a planned move.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,765
Location
Cardiff
No, Fred was shit.

Not replacing him with better players was a mistake. We also tried to sell McTominay
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,284
No it wasn't. We have to accept that this only the start of what's to come. We need to completely get fecked in order to build from the scratch. Keeping Fred would only delay the inevitable.
 

FerociousCorgis

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2017
Messages
4,362
No, Fred was shit.

Not replacing him with better players was a mistake. We also tried to sell McTominay
Exactly. So confused why people think there are only two midfield options in the world and we are stuck between Fred and Mctominay.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,972
His contract was up, and so was his time.

Replacing him with Mount was baffling.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,369
No, Fred was shit.

Not replacing him with better players was a mistake. We also tried to sell McTominay
The club rejected 30m for him while selling Fred for 8m. The line from the club is they need a huge offer to let him go, that's not trying to sell him.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
Of course it was. He’s a better CM than at least two of our first 5 choices.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,417
Location
Berlin
I liked Fred but letting him go at some point was the correct decision. We are not missing him, we are missing his energy. It is a shame, that this is the case but lets re-visit the matter once Amrabat and Mount are at least back.
 

Antisocial

Has a Sony home cinema
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
15,656
He was hardly being used IIRC, even when Cas was suspended, so probably wouldn't have had the chance to make the difference anyway.
 

SirScholes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
6,200
Selling him without an immediate replacement was the bigger issue.
Not sure why we didn’t sell him then go buy amrabat asap as the back cm
Sack off the mason mount idea, sack off dropping 50 mil on a gk
Go get a class cm
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,410
Buying Mount and keeping Scottish Maguire was the mistake.

Viva John Murtough
 

Dannn411

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
2,470
Wrong take. Not selling him and signing two ball playing midfielders early enough was the mistake. We signed one in the end but it was deadline day and he's injured.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,532
I think the mistake was replacing him with Mount.

Selling him and using the funds to help buy a midfielder capable of controlling games against any opposition would've been the smart move.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
9,978
Cas, Eriksen, Bruno, McT. Very little pace and running power in that group. Amrabat has plenty of energy but is a bit pedestrian in the main as well from what I have seen. Of course Fred would have been useful, had some excellent games (and some shockers) last season, including a really strong spell coming off the bench adding energy and impetus.

We are putting a lot of hope on Mainoo and Amrabat, an unfair amount of pressure, but the midfield needs restructuring, Cas and Eriksen can not be the starting pair.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,853
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
Selling Fred was the correct decision. The only mistake is that it wasn't done years sooner.

You cannot rely on a midfielder if you never know whether he will deliver a 2/10 or an 8/10 performance.
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,699
Location
London
Not sure why we didn’t sell him then go buy amrabat asap as the back cm
Sack off the mason mount idea, sack off dropping 50 mil on a gk
Go get a class cm
Seeing the glaring issues in the squad, Mount looks more and more a bizarre way to spunk a good chunk of our budget away on.
 

Thom Merrilin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
785
Selling Fred and upgrading him wouldve been a good idea. Selling Fred and bringing in Mount however probably was a mistake.
 

Care_de_Bobo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
2,375
This is what happens when you have to sell to buy. The club must be deluded thinking they were going to get actual money for Van de Beek to fund a new midfielder.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,342
Location
Hollywood CA
Although the sentiment is a bit kneejerk, I do think it would've made sense to keep Fred in light of all the other changes that seem to have destabilized our midfield.
 

edgecutter

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
4,643
When you have McTominay starting games after selling Fred you have to question the decision makers at the club.
 

The Hilton

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
4,160
People come out with the most absurd statements after a loss.

Fred was capable of some abject performances (as well as great ones in fairness), the wrong side of 30, with a year left on his contract I think. Selling him was the right decision.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,061
I think the mistake was replacing him with Mount.

Selling him and using the funds to help buy a midfielder capable of controlling games against any opposition would've been the smart move.
Yep.

Fred, whilst better than McTominay and actually had a midfield profile nobody else in the team did — he wasn’t the answer. An actual central midfielder to replace him was
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,902
Selling Fred was not the mistake, replacing him with Mount was.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,584
He was in the last year of his contract, the only other option was giving him a new multi-year deal.