Go and do the research and come back to me. I reckon you'll be wrong.
Decisions need to be made with intelligence and analytical planning.
Changes for changes sake are not that.
You'd have to rule out like for like replacements cos that's just the fresh legs angle. You'll have a fair bit of work ahead of yourself. Good luck
Would love to, honestly.
Sadly, my days in the University are far behind me, plus the 2 small children really leave no room for such a research.
I'll check out if anyone has ever done it before, that much time i do have.
I could be quite the read.
Let's say in a Premiership season - you take all the games in to the equation - in a draw situation - does the team whose manager changes first - wins.
You'd have to factor in the table positions and such, but it would be a good shout i think.
In any case, i agree - changes for changes sake are dumb.
But not changing anything in a situation like today - where you have players underperforming (Rashford, Williams, Wan Bisaka - attacking wise), you can and you should change - change players - change formations - change tactics.
But he didnt.
And my opinion is that it cost us a game.