breakout67
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2017
- Messages
- 9,050
- Supports
- Man City
There's no point in talking to people who think our chances created is somehow inflated by wild shots from 35 yards out.All these are considered chances yes. People talk about chances as if the players must be 1 vs 1 with the keeper every chance to be considered. Never mind we also missed these kind of sitters, too. Chance is any chance to get the ball in the net, whatever it's and all teams have been scoring from these.
Can you tell me how many goals top teams were scoring from shots outside the box or by individual skills from single players to open the game ? A lot and when it happens they are considered top quality players. No one say they scored individual goals because they don't have a style of play.
If our players are creative they should be scoring hard goals. If we were waiting for us to create 10 1vs1 chances each match we'll be disappointed. The "not crearing clear cut chances " term is misused heavily to justify us not scoring. If our players can't score unless they are 5 yards away from the goal then we are in serious troubles here.
I did some stat collecting when the Tottenham game was happening and found some interesting stuff.
We create the 3rd most chances in the penalty box and the 2nd most chances in the 6-yard area in the league. We have the worst conversion rate out of the top 6 for both shots in the penalty box and 6-yard area. Our conversion rate somehow gets worse as we move closer to the goal, especially relative to other teams. From the top 6 we have the joint highest proportion of shots in the penalty box that are also in the 6-yard area, so we aren't just taking speculative shots from the edge of the box we are creating many clear cut chances.
Chelsea are actually the worst out of the top 6 at creating chances in the penalty box and 6-yard area, but they have by far the best conversion rate. Tottenham are also quite bad at creating chances close to the goal but have the 2nd best conversion rate after Chelsea.
When you watch our team, and then watch Chelsea and Tottenham you see a clear difference in quality of attackers. When Costa or Kane have a half chance they test the keeper, meanwhile Rashford fluffs most of his 1-on-1s. Ibrahimovic is also partly to blame but he has saved so many of our games this season that he can be excused. Hazard dribbles past 2 defenders and slots it in the corner by himself, Martial dribbles past 1 defender and gets the ball caught under his feet and loses the ball. Lingard is Lingard.
Chelsea won the league because they have proven goal scorers in their team. Chelsea have played some proper shite this season, but Hazard and Costa have regularly created goals out of nothing to get them started and the other team to leave space for them to exploit.