Should we give up on Anthony Martial?

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,330
Attitude is a cop out. He lacks of the ball movement and is extremely one sided in his control which is why he looks terrible on the right. His hold up is very overrated on here and his interplay and touch passes aren't great which is why he constantly loses the ball when he receives it high up. For me, all he does is cut inside from the left. It's not just attitude, he has certain attractive skills, but his general ability is overrated due to this.
 

meamth

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2017
Messages
5,946
Location
Malaysia
He is clearly off the pace in that game, Ole's failed judgement to field him, but come on now, let him get some form going before saying he is finished.
 

frostbite

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,240
When a guy of that age has had only 2 good seasons out of 6 and that those 2 seasons came when he was not facing particular internal competition, that says it all to me. If he can't take the heat nor work his socks of to EARN HIS SPOT, then we have every right to give up on him. Martial epitomizes the wrong attitude to have at the club.
I agree. It is not like he is trying and things don't work out for him. He gives the impression that he doesn't even want to try.

Unfortunately, I don't think there are any teams who would like to buy Martial from us.
 

KGBhoy

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2001
Messages
1,729
Absolutely. He had his moments and he's not a bad player. But he's a bad player for us and has been for a while. Never reached any kind of consistency. Maybe he can go somewhere where his career will be reignited. But the thought of him drudging along not even pretending to care makes me sick. He should go.
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,262
Location
Australia
He's lost a lot of the explosiveness and close control that were his best attributes. He's quite a poor player now imo.
 

United in sin

New Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2020
Messages
2,781
He had a horrible season that ended with him on a long injury layoff that he just recently fully recovered from. He's clearly not match fit either. I think we'll see the best of Martial this season, and I can see him linking up well with Sancho.
 

git_united

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
400
He's lost a lot of the explosiveness and close control that were his best attributes. He's quite a poor player now imo.
Yeah this is what’s scary for me. Whatever was lost with his lack of off-the-ball movement was (kinda) made up for with his explosiveness and close control. Now all that seems to be gone (Compare Sevilla EL semifinal with Soton: Different ends of the season and fitness notwithstanding, the difference in performance is jarring.)
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,757
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
Football is a 90 minute game. In that 90 minutes, as a striker, you may have the ball at your feet for about 3 minutes (I am pulling this number out of my @SS so now reason to prove me wrong by showing a 4 minute stat. you get the point). So what are you do for the other 87 minutes makes a huge difference for how good you are. Especially if you're a #9. Strikers probably have the least amount of touches than anyone on the field. So what are you doing without the ball? Martial likes to walk around, drift out to the left, or show for the ball. His biggest problem is that he doesn't see space. He doesn't have that "strikers instinct". He doesn't get tap ins. He wants the ball at his feet, and he wants to dribble. His hold up play is actually pretty good. But after he holds it up and passes it off he often acts as if his job is done. If Luke Shaw and Pogba have the ball out on the left wing, he should be making a near post run (while the right winger makes a far post run). Instead, Martial is often out on the left wing with them. He's just not a striker. He doesn't see the game. Some talk about James not having a football brain. James may make some odd choices with the ball at his feet, but he makes better runs than most of our players without the ball. If Martial could learn what to do without the ball he could probably be a very good player. I just don't see it happening...
 

Red Company

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2019
Messages
1,072
Location
Toronto
Supports
The Peaky Blinders
Football is a 90 minute game. In that 90 minutes, as a striker, you may have the ball at your feet for about 3 minutes (I am pulling this number out of my @SS so now reason to prove me wrong by showing a 4 minute stat. you get the point). So what are you do for the other 87 minutes makes a huge difference for how good you are. Especially if you're a #9. Strikers probably have the least amount of touches than anyone on the field. So what are you doing without the ball? Martial likes to walk around, drift out to the left, or show for the ball. His biggest problem is that he doesn't see space. He doesn't have that "strikers instinct". He doesn't get tap ins. He wants the ball at his feet, and he wants to dribble. His hold up play is actually pretty good. But after he holds it up and passes it off he often acts as if his job is done. If Luke Shaw and Pogba have the ball out on the left wing, he should be making a near post run (while the right winger makes a far post run). Instead, Martial is often out on the left wing with them. He's just not a striker. He doesn't see the game. Some talk about James not having a football brain. James may make some odd choices with the ball at his feet, but he makes better runs than most of our players without the ball. If Martial could learn what to do without the ball he could probably be a very good player. I just don't see it happening...
Great analysis, great post.
 

smi11ie

Not a philogynist
Newbie
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
885
Location
Buri Ram
Supports
Rangers
Martial is still a good player but he has not done enough to earn a starting place. He should be used as a sub until he scores more.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,678
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Of course. But maybe that strikers and forward players tend to play well when the midfield plays well?

I'm not saying Martial was awful last season - he was. But it's funny watching people continuously blame Martial (there were 3 active threads bashing Martial after our last game) for problems that lie elsewhere.
I agree with you, there was a massive knee jerk reaction to the last game to the point where everyone's finished or needs to be sold, and Solskjaer isn't good enough. I've repeatedly said it's too early to go in hard on Martial yet but his lack of movement is seriously worrying.
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,504
Martial is as good as he’s going to be, and that’s not good enough for Man Utd.
 

afatzp

Full Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
236
Football is a 90 minute game. In that 90 minutes, as a striker, you may have the ball at your feet for about 3 minutes (I am pulling this number out of my @SS so now reason to prove me wrong by showing a 4 minute stat. you get the point). So what are you do for the other 87 minutes makes a huge difference for how good you are. Especially if you're a #9. Strikers probably have the least amount of touches than anyone on the field. So what are you doing without the ball? Martial likes to walk around, drift out to the left, or show for the ball. His biggest problem is that he doesn't see space. He doesn't have that "strikers instinct". He doesn't get tap ins. He wants the ball at his feet, and he wants to dribble. His hold up play is actually pretty good. But after he holds it up and passes it off he often acts as if his job is done. If Luke Shaw and Pogba have the ball out on the left wing, he should be making a near post run (while the right winger makes a far post run). Instead, Martial is often out on the left wing with them. He's just not a striker. He doesn't see the game. Some talk about James not having a football brain. James may make some odd choices with the ball at his feet, but he makes better runs than most of our players without the ball. If Martial could learn what to do without the ball he could probably be a very good player. I just don't see it happening...
Well said. That also explained why our central mid field always lost the battle when Martial was in the line-up , as Bruno had to constantly make the run into box to use the space when Martial drifting to the left . When we lost the ball trying to pass it to Bruno in the box, Martial did not have the awareness to press or cover up the ground for Bruno and our central mid field was left 2 against 3, that gave opponent huge advantages to counter attack.

I don't want to start criticism on Ole, but Martial clearly was not match fit in the Southampton game and his shape looks like a 35 year-old Andy Cole. It's ridiculous if we tried the "play to find form" tactics as it would cost us the title chance in early stage, especially we had Sacho on bench and Greenwood in form at CF position. Or the coach team did not notice Martial was not match fit, then that would be pure incompetency.

On the other hand, Paul Pogba now well in shape compared with last half season. That shows incentive and self-drive (maybe just for earning a big fat contract, who knows) , and Martial right now totally lacks of it.
 

lilcurt

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
3,588
Location
Birmingham
A fresh start would be best for both parties.

He has regressed in recent years and is a shadow of what we thought he would become.

I think he lacks the desire to be a top, top player. Shame because I think the talent is there.
 

RoyH1

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
5,981
Location
DKNY
I think we should loan him out and see if he can refind himself. That way we can get a better fee for him in a years time.
 

Beans

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
3,514
Location
Midwest, USA
Supports
Neutral
I think we should loan him out and see if he can refind himself. That way we can get a better fee for him in a years time.
Not a bad idea. I think if he started a whole season he would benefit from that. If we can get in a replacement, of course.
 

Martialfc

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Messages
314
Martial has a ballon dor clause in his contract which is almost laughable. The guy is a lazy striker who will never make it at the top top level. Would he be doing what Cavani is doing at the same age? I don’t think he would, do you?
 

Hughes35

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,594
Gave up on him a couple of years ago to be honest. Offers nothing at all.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,678
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I think we should loan him out and see if he can refind himself. That way we can get a better fee for him in a years time.
If we can get Haaland in January then that will most likely happen but we should just outright sell him next summer while Inter are looking to replace Lukaku
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,498
The fact that City want to get rid of Bernardo Silva, a player who has contributed far more for them then martial has for us speaks volumes about where we are as a club. They're ruthless when they need to be. Meanwhile we keep persevering with a player whos been so bad for over a year now and is showing no signs whatsoever of improving. Knowing us, we'll probably reward him with a new contract.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,154
The wikipedia page for "sunk cost fallacy" should have Martial face on it. It's a problem at United.

That, and awarding big contracts to anyone who shows any kind of good form for a couple of months.
 

Kaizane

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2018
Messages
349
Ole came in and immediately Martial had his best season with us - that's no coincidence and it suggests he's not self-motivated. Then, after his best season, Greenwood emerged, we signed Cavani, constant talks of signing a proper long-term CF like Haaland and us being seriously linked with Sancho for over a year, all coincide with his drop off in form and all these are players that occupy his supposed best positions.

It has to be psychological with him because if he truly gave himself to his profession, he'd be among the best in the world, he really does have that much ability. If I had to hazard a guess at where his head is at, going off his effort and body language, even before his injury, I would guess that he's given up on us as his rationale could be that he thinks the club don't believe him in being first choice, so why should he care too much? I don't believe he has the drive him in to cement first choice status at either LW or CF and I think in the back of his mind, he knows he doesn't have the drive to get there and stay there. I'm not holding it against him, not everyone has that unmitigated desire to reach the top, it all depends on his experiences at grass roots and his home life, we're all human at the end of the day. However, I will hold it against Ole if he keeps picking him to start ahead of people that show real desire to want to play.
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,329
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
Strikers better than Martial:
  1. Ronaldo
  2. Lewandowski
  3. Muller
  4. Lukaku
  5. Morten Gamst Pedersen
  6. Martial 2 years ago
  7. Martial 5 years ago
  8. Kevin Davies
  9. Tshabalala
  10. Emile Heskey
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
He was terrible last season and we didn’t miss him. This season Cavani is our main no 9, Greenwood can take the 2nd spot while Rashford can the 3rd spot. Although, I would keep him but if 40m offer comes in, we should just give up on him and take the money without even thinking about it.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,678
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I think he was good for us when we were fighting for a Europa League place but with better players around him the club has out grown him unfortunately. Like a lower division striker who’s team have been promoted and it’s just a stretch too far for him.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I'd loved to be able to keep Martial as a bench player (our Gabriel Jesus etc) on bench wages.

However, paying him as one of the most important players when he isn't is just wrong.

Plus we just always seem to be stacked at LW - elanga for example has just joined the number of players we have alongside Sancho.
 

Tallis

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
982
One thing I have noticed about him over the last 12 months is that he really struggles to get past players. His take on success rate must be horrible during this period. It’s almost like he tried to reinvent himself as a classic 9, and forgot how to play as a wide forward. Then his goal scoring left him too so now he is basically a nothing player and I wonder whether we may be better off recalling Pellistri from loan and giving him the time or alternatively playing Elanga
 

bosskeano

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
5,131
I've given up on him at any point being a #9.....he either has to play on the left wing or you might as well sell him otherwise he's wasting a squad space by trying to force him into playing up top
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,206
Location
La-La-Land
We (mainly Ole) needs to be ruthless if we want to improve. We have to many bystanders, Martial is one if them. Either bench or sold
 

Leonzo1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 25, 2019
Messages
941
The problem I have with Martial is that when things don't go his way he is just a terrible player to have. I honestly can't recall when was the last time he had a good game from the bench. If you bring on Rashford from the bench you just know he is going to give his all with his directness and pace. Cavani will bleed on the pitch. Even lingard and James sometimes have excellent substitute performances. There is no point of keeping him as an option. I honestly would rather see anyother player given 20 minutes to change the game then Martial.
 

SeanyC

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
386
One season wonder that’s all he is…waste of money and LVG was to blame for that
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
The fact that City want to get rid of Bernardo Silva, a player who has contributed far more for them then martial has for us speaks volumes about where we are as a club. They're ruthless when they need to be. Meanwhile we keep persevering with a player whos been so bad for over a year now and is showing no signs whatsoever of improving. Knowing us, we'll probably reward him with a new contract.
Manchester City wants to keep Bernardo Silva. It's the player who wants to force a move, he wants to go back to spain and La Liga.

He's got 2 years left on his contract and has had Jorge Mendes spend all summer trying to get him out of there.

I'm not sure why you'd go on the internet and tell a lie.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,498
Manchester City wants to keep Bernardo Silva. It's the player who wants to force a move, he wants to go back to spain and La Liga.

He's got 2 years left on his contract and has had Jorge Mendes spend all summer trying to get him out of there.

I'm not sure why you'd go on the internet and tell a lie.
It's not all a one way street. Silva wants to leave, city don't mind him leaving and won't stand in his way. In fact they even offered him to Tottenham as part of the Kane deal.

My original point still stands. I'm not sure why you'd go on the internet and tell a lie.
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
It's not all a one way street. Silva wants to leave, city don't mind him leaving and won't stand in his way. In fact they even offered him to Tottenham as part of the Kane deal.

My original point still stands. I'm not sure why you'd go on the internet and tell a lie.
Yes they're not standing in his way because its club policy to let players who WANT to go, go, as long as they can find a new club. Offering Silva in a trade was an attempt to make that happen.

That's also the same club policy that Mancester United have.

You double lie, shame on you.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,498
Yes they're not standing in his way because its club policy to let players who WANT to go, go, as long as they can find a new club. Offering Silva in a trade was an attempt to make that happen.

That's also the same club policy that Mancester United have.

You double lie, shame on you.
Sure, it's exactly why we still have players like jones, lingaard, dalot, martial, Matic all at the club. We're not ruthless when we need to be.

But clearly you're more interested in internet forum clout, so carry on.
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
Sure, it's exactly why we still have players like jones, lingaard, dalot, martial, Matic all at the club. We're not ruthless when we need to be.

But clearly you're more interested in internet forum clout, so carry on.
I'm just being interested in being right. You made an argument which was incorrect.