Honestly, I don't see very much difference between the two sides. Other than the fact David Villa would've scored at least two of Morata's chances and one of Moreno's.
Spain had 85 per cent possession last night and it wasn't sterile. Koke also should have scored at least once.
In 2010 Spain played pretty much the same way. It led to a shaky start with a loss to Switzerland, a comfortable win against Honduras. A really tight win against Chile, where Bielsa's tactics were very impressive. Followed by a succession of 1-0s in the knockouts. Spain's 2010 World Cup win was impressive but, as I remember it, it wasn't a case of them peppering the goal with shots. It was them keeping the ball, tiring the opposition and then David Villa scoring. It was not that exciting to watch, it was like watching a snake slowly strangle its prey.
If Spain had David Villa last night the game ends 2 or 3-0 and we're all talking about how Spain are 'back'.
The differences is huge, no just Villa...
That team was one of the best of football history.
Spain started playing a real quality "tiki taka" under Luis Aragones and we won the Euro2008. It was kind of unexpected after 2006 elimination against France, but the team played very well. Massive superiority (4-1, 3-0 to Russia that was the surprise of the tournament) or 1-0 in the final against Germany , which should have been 3-0 easy. Massive superiority despite of the result.
However it came with a cost... literally every team in the world started playing with an Airbus... 10 players in the area. Germany, France, Portugal, Italy... no matter who. 90 minutes of Spain trying to find a space against a wall.
With less space... Spain just got patient... taking less risks (Switzerland game was a warning... you cannot concede.) and taking total control of the games... if your opponent don't want to play you are not going to give them spaces. It worked so well that Spain won Euro2008, WC2010 and Euro2012 without conceding a single goal in knock out stages, dominating 90 mins per match. If we scored soon and the rival went forward... better for us. 4-0 against Italy in the Euro2012 final because they just left more spaces. If the opponents had chosen a less negative football Spain would have played more aggressively (and scored more goals).
Today the story is very different... the quality of the players is far from it... the dominance is different. Now we have the ball, but we do not necessarily dominate the match. We are not as good in the offensive side, but the main difference is that the defense is way weaker. Not just because of the names, but due to the ball speed and situations and places where we lose the ball... now we lose the ball in more dangerous positions, the opponent is less tired (because of the speed, not % of possession) and they can counter-attack (or dominate the game, which was out of the table in the past) easily and with more energy.
Today we can beat anyone (we scored 6 against Germany and Croatia in the last 2 years), but we can lose or suffer against anyone too (Ukraine por example).