The title of the thread is: 'The Athletic: Man Utd coaches trying Sancho as RWB'.
I then posted a reply about someone commenting on the Athletic being a reputable source. To which I disagreed.
So I'm not sure where you're coming from with this, I think your slightly off piste with your words here?
The article is pure crap, we know he hasn't been fully fit, he's getting up to speed with the league, the whole RWB positional swap is merely fodder for the sensationalist hunters, something to rile up the supporters, something the headline of the article does, 'Sancho is collateral damage', even that's sensationalist and pure crap in itself.
So please, next time you comment, make sure it's relevant to my point, cheers.