The "England have had it easy" narrative

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,968
Exactly. If it wasn't an easy route no one would have to post a 4,000 word essay explaining why it's not :houllier:

I can't wait until they get knocked out. What a pathetic and drab team.
:lol: You are the most bitter and pathetic individual in this forum at the moment. At least it's banter with most of the others giving England a hard time. You are truly just a sad case.
 

Winrar

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
12,926
Location
Maryland
Apparently both Colombia and Sweden were better teams than us and were going to knock us out. As soon as we beat them, they become shit and we've been lucky with the route.
Guarantee same will happen with Croatia if England manage to beat them as well. Despite the fact that same Croatia side handily crushed Argentina in group stages. (not to mention Sweden was responsible for putting out Italy and Netherlands in group stages who were supposed to be "tougher" matchups)
 

99withaflake

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
1,657
Location
Melbourne, Australia
I won't be thinking about the route to the trophy when I tell my grand-kids in 40 years.
Same. I'll be telling them that to reach the final we beat Colombia the masters of the dark arts, the strong and organised Swedes, and the creative and talented Croatia (who had the best midfielder in the tournament).
 

99withaflake

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
1,657
Location
Melbourne, Australia
No Croatia are a good team and difficult for any team to beat. But compared to what you might expect in a semi final it’s as good as it gets.
Since 1998 the following teams have reached the semi finals: Turkey, South Korea, Uruguay, Netherlands, Croatia (twice).

I do think we've got a good draw in the sense that we're not playing one of the favourites, and we should be pretty happy, but lots of finalists have also had easyish semi finals in the past.
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,231
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
Since 1998 the following teams have reached the semi finals: Turkey, South Korea, Uruguay, Netherlands, Croatia (twice).

I do think we've got a good draw in the sense that we're not playing one of the favourites, and we should be pretty happy, but lots of finalists have also had easyish semi finals in the past.
i agree with you that england are having their first knockout opponent that isnt easy
 

marukomu

The Gatekeeper
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
20,649
Location
gusset
It would have been more difficult if the so called 'good teams' hadn't been shit and got knocked out.
Their fault, not ours.
 

99withaflake

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
1,657
Location
Melbourne, Australia
i agree with you that england are having their first knockout opponent that isnt easy
This is how I'd rate our opponents (and possible opponents) out of 10:
  • Tunisia 5/10
  • Panama 2/10
  • Belgium B Team - Doesn't Count
  • Colombia 7/10
  • Sweden 6/10
  • Croatia 8/10
  • France/Belgium 9/10
I'd say England are somewhere between 7.5 and 8.5 :D
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,796
Since 1998 the following teams have reached the semi finals: Turkey, South Korea, Uruguay, Netherlands, Croatia (twice).

I do think we've got a good draw in the sense that we're not playing one of the favourites, and we should be pretty happy, but lots of finalists have also had easyish semi finals in the past.
Aside from fact that uruguay and Netherlands are not easy games (and played eachother), its not really relevant, its a separate stand alone point to say that on top of easy qualifying, laughable group and straightforward knockouts england have a tricky semi final- though not bad for this stage of competition. Im not detracting or saying other teams havent had similar games in the past
 

99withaflake

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
1,657
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Aside from fact that uruguay and Netherlands are not easy games (and played eachother), its not really relevant, its a separate stand alone point to say that on top of easy qualifying, laughable group and straightforward knockouts england have a tricky semi final- though not bad for this stage of competition. Im not detracting or saying other teams havent had similar games in the past
It is relevant because teams have arguably had easier semi finals in the past than England currently do. Worst teams have reached the semi final than this current Croatian team.

I think we agree though. A tricky game for England, but couldn't have really hoped for much better.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,784
Location
USA
I love the denial. Just because big teams have been crap against minnows, does not mean the minnows are all dangerous. This has been England's easiest ever route probably. Southgate and the team decided to take the easier route by going second in a useless group so that they have a better route to semis. And so far it has worked well.
I don't mind all such tricks. It is not cheap or illegal. Except certain English fans hypocricy to call out other team tactics as cowardice, when their NT took the easiest route, there is no problem. FIFA made such a route available and England NT took it. Fair fecks.
I don't see why fans should feel ashamed or try to create a new narrative that it was some kind of tough route.

I hope Croats put in a real tough match. England need to come out winning in a hard test if they want any chance to defeat France or Belgium in the final.
 

UDontMessWith24

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Messages
4,023
So England's road would have been harder if they had to face the teams that lost to the teams they have and will knock out if they are to reach the final. Flawless logic.
 

Andy_Cole

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
8,021
Location
Manchester
If we got Sweden in the last 16 and Columbia in the quarters I think the outlook would have been different. Sweden for the quarters was an easy game, but we did very well to beat Columbia in the last 16.

Now Croatia in the semis again is probably quarters standard in my opinion. But Croatia have been great this tournament. Fully deserving to get to the semis. If we beat them to the final we’re fully deserving.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,822
Location
india
It's clearly an easy route. You spent all that text countering something factual.
 

Red Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
55,376
Location
Across the Universe....from Old Trafford.
The England team, midfield especially has gotten better. Playing almost 2 matches per week has got the team to gel.
I see no reason why England would not have beaten Germany or Brazil.

The Italy of 1982 were dire in the group stages. Just scrapped through.

Magnificient later on. Totaly destroying Germany in the final.

Man for man Crotia have a better midfield. But that is not how it works.

Southgate has built a Team. Trusting the players. We can see it. Players seem better than they have been for their clubs.

That is the key.
 

MuFc_1992

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
1,212
It's almost like a video game where difficulty level is going up incrementally and the final boss fight is going to be the hardest one.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,796
So England's road would have been harder if they had to face the teams that lost to the teams they have and will knock out if they are to reach the final. Flawless logic.
Youre ignoring that they drew the easiest of 3rd and 4th seeds and made a tricky job of beating one of them. Not only could they have had a way harder group but it also means some tougher teams may have made it through other groups due to having an easier draw. Because a team went out does not make them a bad team.

England could have had a group of belgium serbia and egypt, just as an example.
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,968
Youre ignoring that they drew the easiest of 3rd and 4th seeds and made a tricky job of beating one of them. Not only could they have had a way harder group but it also means some tougher teams may have made it through other groups due to having an easier draw. Because a team went out does not make them a bad team.

England could have had a group of belgium serbia and egypt, just as an example.
England could also have failed to make the semi finals.

But they didn't. They are in the semi finals of a world cup.
 

UDontMessWith24

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Messages
4,023
England could also have failed to make the semi finals.

But they didn't. They are in the semi finals of a world cup.
I think people are a little concerned confused in regards to how a tournament works. I've also apparently missed all those world cups in which the winner won every game 4-0. Doesn't sound all that entertaining tbh.
 

99withaflake

Full Member
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
1,657
Location
Melbourne, Australia
what your golden generation would have done for a draw like that......
Saw a post the other day saying something along the lines of "would players such as Lampard, Gerrard and Beckham be making the same amount of runs, showing the same level of movement, and be creating the space and options that a lot of boys in the team are currently doing"

I have to say I agree. Even with the same draw, with the golden generation we'd still be relying on individuals to step up, rather than just being the better team and playing decent football. If those players were coached correctly though, they could have got to a final, and will always be a bit of a regret that they didn't.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
Sweden aren’t weak. They qualified top of a group containing Germany. They also beat a Swiss team that Brazil couldn’t beat
 

Billy Blaggs

Flacco of the Blaggs tribe
Joined
Nov 6, 2000
Messages
25,831
Location
Accidental founder of Blaggstianity.
Saw a post the other day saying something along the lines of "would players such as Lampard, Gerrard and Beckham be making the same amount of runs, showing the same level of movement, and be creating the space and options that a lot of boys in the team are currently doing"

I have to say I agree. Even with the same draw, with the golden generation we'd still be relying on individuals to step up, rather than just being the better team and playing decent football. If those players were coached correctly though, they could have got to a final, and will always be a bit of a regret that they didn't.
That's spot on

This team is the best team I've ever seen since 86
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,231
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
I think people are a little concerned confused in regards to how a tournament works. I've also apparently missed all those world cups in which the winner won every game 4-0. Doesn't sound all that entertaining tbh.
no we get it. every tournament due to variance and other factors some team has an easy route. this year its england that has it
 

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,812
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
I wonder how many posters in the crowd defending England's path moaned about Liverpool's path in the CL run. I see parallels in both cup runs.

A team can only beat the actual opposition not hypotheticals and what ifs, and the England/Croatia side of the bracket wasn't overly strong partly due to a few top class nations falling out.

Figure they'll lose to Croatia anyhow, and the Belgium/France winner is probably taking the trophy regardless of the final opponent.
 

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,938
Location
Florida, man
To call this an easy run is to overrate the “big” teams and underrate the “small” teams.
 

Davistiano

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
55
Location
Australia
I mean, we can rate all these NT however we want all day long

How I see this is that, despite there is indeed some difference in terms of players' quality between teams, let's not forget that these "easy opponent" also did their hard work to come all the way through.

A simple example would be (probably a bit over but you get the idea), if the final is England vs HongKong, will you say England has an easy final, given how Hong Kong team fought their way through these other "giants" team? At least I don't think Southgate will then go: "go out and have fun guys, its just Hong Kong, I got no instruction for you."

And this is why football is such a fantastic sport, because a team with no superstar can beat any other teams with correct tactics and teamwork. So, regardless of the route being easy or not, England team deserves all the applaud for getting this far! :)
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,757
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
I don’t get this.

It is obvious England have had a relatively easy route to the semi’s.

Having said that, does anyone care? No. Will anyone remember it in the future? No.

I don’t see why people must try and make the bizarre point that it hasn’t been an easier route. It has. But so what?
The reason why people care is because most will do what ever they can just so they don't have to say "England is a good team"
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,462
Location
Hollywood CA
I won't be thinking about the route to the trophy when I tell my grand-kids in 40 years.
Obviously. These ancillary narratives during the tournament will be long forgotten by then. The only things that will be remembered are who won, who won golden boot, and a few memorable goals.
 

Billy Blaggs

Flacco of the Blaggs tribe
Joined
Nov 6, 2000
Messages
25,831
Location
Accidental founder of Blaggstianity.
@Jonno

I won't be thinking about the route to the trophy when I tell my grand-kids in 40 years

Yep that's what I think., 66 wasn't perfect but it was really

When I tell my grandkids about the tone we won the world cup..
It is gonna be awesome.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,796
England could also have failed to make the semi finals.

But they didn't. They are in the semi finals of a world cup.
Yes they are. Congratulations to them. Threads like this wouldnt exist if people weren't so defensive about the reality that their route has been straightforward. Not a criticism, just a fact. If they had topped the group then seen Belgium breeze to the final fans would be lamenting their tough side of the draw. People get too defensive about fans making the same point they would make of any team
 

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,812
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
@SER19 if memory serves, there were plenty preferring Belgium to top the group as it set up a potentially easier path on the other side of the bracket for the group runnerup. Further backs up your post.
 

Globule

signature/tagline creator extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
4,760
Sure, it's been easier than it could have been, but let's embrace that. It's not like it's our fault. Maybe if Spain and Germany could have beaten some of those 'easier' teams, or if Italy and the Netherlands had actually made it here in the first place, we might have had a more 'difficult' route, but hey ho.