This poll definitely confirms there has been a significant change in the perception of the Glazers and of our financial position. But it does very little to pin down exactly what that change is. As has been said, the choices are too crude to tease out the concerns people still have.
I'm not sure I agree with the characterisation of MUST as liars either. I don't think Anders intended to mislead people, he just set out his point of view, which I believe was sincerely held, and informed. I wouldn't call him dumb either.
The boycott thing may well have been misguided but we'll never know for sure. History is written by the winners and MUST lost. If the boycott had been successful who knows what would've happened. Short term pain, perhaps long term gain, if your goal is fan ownership. Who knows. I must say I always thought it was a very high risk strategy, as likely to bring us to our knees as the debt. I always thought more debate was needed about what would've come next, how the club would've been rebuilt. Maybe that lack of clarity is a factor in why it failed.
The main thing is, the Glazers clearly knew their onions, had a business plan most of us couldn't comprehend, and seem to have executed it brilliantly. So hats off to them. Good owners? Maybe, maybe not. The next few years will tell us more. I'm happy to have been wrong about impending disaster.