Dan
☃
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
- Messages
- 14,412
Good update nimic.
My team is not as bad as I thought they were, at least i’m not in the Knicks.
My team is not as bad as I thought they were, at least i’m not in the Knicks.
Sure! Go to this thread and fill in the required stuff, and I'll add you to the 2000 draft.Can I register for the 2000 draft? If so, put my name in please!
That could be because @sebsheep used 825 pts in his build not 725You're currently tipped to go #1 in the draft, but it's a very strong draft class so anything could happen.
Ratings: you have a total of 725 points to allocate to the following attributes (1-100):
- Height: 60
- Strength: 60
- Speed: 70
- Jumping: 50
- Endurance: 70
- Inside scoring: 75
- Dunks/Layups: 60
- Free Throws: 50
- Mid Range: 40
- Three Pointers: 45
- Offensive IQ: 70
- Defensive IQ: 20
- Dribbling: 60
- Passing: 40
- Rebounding: 55
What? FfsThat could be because @sebsheep used 825 pts in his build not 725
#1 daftWhat? Ffs
Why you little...!What? Ffs
Why you little...!
Give me your changes and I'll sort you out.
I think that adds up to 725...
- Height: 60
- Strength: 55
- Speed: 65
- Jumping: 50
- Endurance: 60
- Inside scoring: 65
- Dunks/Layups: 50
- Free Throws: 45
- Mid Range: 45
- Three Pointers: 40
- Offensive IQ: 65
- Defensive IQ: 10
- Dribbling: 50
- Passing: 30
- Rebounding: 35
And cavity searches.Requesting a forensic audit of all submitted player totals.
Delete Player? Bit harsh. Put him last in the draft!Why you little...!
Give me your changes and I'll sort you out.
Pippen and Kukoc are still there, but getting old. Jordan signed with Toronto in 1996.What happened to prime Bulls?
When is Big Billy Benito Singleton getting drafted?
Assuming you don't get screwed by the draft lottery. For those who don't know, it's not a straight "worst to best" in the draft, at least not for the high picks. The worse your regular season record is, the higher a % chance you have to get a good pick. So the worst team has the best chance to get the #1 pick, but they're still statistically more likely to not get it. That's how Salt Bailly ended up on Milwaukee, who only had the 9th worst record, but won the 1.3% chance to get the #1 pick.I'll take 6th in voting.
We'll likely get another Caf prodigy in our draft pick right? Since we were dogshit all season.
Am I right in thinking it was originally a straight worst to best but they introduced the lottery to change it because teams were tanking deliberately?Assuming you don't get screwed by the draft lottery. For those who don't know, it's not a straight "worst to best" in the draft, at least not for the high picks. The worse your regular season record is, the higher a % chance you have to get a good pick. So the worst team has the best chance to get the #1 pick, but they're still statistically more likely to not get it. That's how Salt Bailly ended up on Milwaukee, who only had the 9th worst record, but won the 1.3% chance to get the #1 pick.
Yep, I think so. Not sure how much it worked, but hey.Am I right in thinking it was originally a straight worst to best but they introduced the lottery to change it because teams were tanking deliberately?
Done.@Damien how many people can I tag atm? Can I get like... 25? Only 17 people in this now, but I'm nothing if not an optimist.
Thanks babeDone.
They say talents like that’s only come around once every 1000 years.Give me an offensive star to pair with, and we'd win every game