No, this is exactly the point of my post. I'm actually disagreeing with the person that I originally replied to.
A lot of their players are going to be bang average without Klopp, but there are exceptions. Gakpo is a very good player who isn't being used optimally right now. Elliott isn't a guaranteed starter at this point, but trust me, he's very good despite being a cnut.
Right now, their squad is a top 4 challenging team at best, so still being in the title race in April is an overachievement for them.
However, within the next 2 or 3 years, they'll basically lose Klopp, van Dijk, Salah, and maybe even Trent. I'd consider all 4 of them irreplaceable for Liverpool. I also expect them to go through a few managers in the next 5 years, not because they'll hire incompetent clowns, but because they won't be on Klopp's level, and Liverpool don't have as big of a pull as other historic giant clubs.
So overall, I'm disagreeing with the post saying they'll be fine, because it's more likely than not IMO, that they'll be just in and out of the top 4 for the next ~3-5 years, much like how we have been doing for the last 11 seasons.
It doesn't mean that I'm on a wind up just because I think they have a few very talented players. Basically at least 15 out of the 20 PL teams have at least a few exceptional players these days.