Well the argument suits the recipient I suppose.
Btw, he
wasn't under mind control. Thought I'd clear that up for you.
There's no back-peddling whatsoever except possibly the imaginary one going off in your head. You painted Pep's actions in a very different light to Jose's ones. If you indeed did view both in a rational, level-headed and logical manner you'd see both for what they are. But you found Jose's amusing and found Pep's very different and strange. That doesn't make sense unless you're willing to admit that you're clearly extremely biased and unable to view both scenarios from the same perspective. That's fine, it's your wish. But it will get highlighted by others since it weakens your argument.
The bolded bit is where your entire post falls apart, really. If you bother to read posts rather than just going off on aimless rants and throwing hissy fits, you'd notice that I'm not interested in deciding what should be discussed and what shouldn't. In fact, if this incident wasn't discussed it would be really weird. When a renown manager behaves hysterically of course it will be discussed. I've made it pretty clear that it's the disproportionate response that I disagreed with. There's loads of really weird reactions using words like psycho, mental disability, mentally unstable etc. and that's what I don't agree with. So I'm not sure what you're on about here.
What is a "proper professional"? Speaking to a player on the pitch is unprofessional now? Who is the arbitrator of professionalism -you? Walking on to the pitch and speaking to a player isn't inherently wrong and out of his jurisdiction. He probably shouldn't have done it in such a weird and aggressive manner though. Then again, the player himself didnt seem to take offense by it. Which is always funny - when others get more offended by the "victim". And you and anyone else is entitled to question him if you 'feel like it' too. I'm sorry if you can't deal with the concept of free speech applying to others as well. Piss poor indeed.
There you go with that wild imagination of yours.
What's wrong with him sending a message to the manager exactly? Did Sir Alex not play mind games or be confrontational with other managers? When our manager was confrontational and outspoken we seemed to love it. It seems a strange thing to take so seriously. Also, wasn't Pep speaking to him one on one? How was he making a public comment?
Btw, I dont think there should be any one way of playing football, or that negative football is just inherently wrong, but nor do I see an issue with Pep expressing his views (incorrect as they are) on the topic. He clearly believes that everyone should play positive football. It's the reason why despite playing MSN and having injuries, he set his Bayern team to be aggressive and got shat on. He has a myipic view on football.
I'll sum up my views on this topic because we're going in circles and dont agree it seems.
- Pep is a bit of an eccentric odball.
- I found his behavior towards the Bayern medical to be really poor.
- This incidents seems to have offended others more than it did the player.
- And back to my main point, the responses to the incident have been way over the topic. It should be discussed but some of the replies were hilarous.
I'm going to summarize my thoughts as this topic is truly boring now and all discussions is just the same thing being regurgitated now. Firstly, I did paint his actions in a different light to Jose - I never said Jose's actions were better, in fact I didn't even compare them. I simply said I found his response funny, doesn't mean I agree with his actions. I thought it was quite petty between both Conte and Jose. Given the circumstances it really wasn't a surprise, given the statement Conte made, it was obvious Jose would respond - no-one was surprised. It's also accepted that Jose is a feckwit and has been discussed to death. What Pep did might not be as bad as some of the things Jose has done in his career, but they're not the same person, their actions aren't linear. Both can be praised and criticized as individuals. I didn't find him calling other managers fat funny, nor did I agree with it, same with him poking someone's eyes out. In this specific scenario I found his response funny, even though I still didn't agree with it. I enjoy banter as much as anyone else but it was petty between two grown ass men. Bias isn't directly correlated with humor. I find some of the people on AFTV so fecking tedious but find them to be hilarious. I don't agree with some of the shit Jose does but he can be funny at times, same goes for Pep. That being said, they're both two completely different, isolated incidents. Simply because I found one humorous, doesn't mean I'm biased for not finding the other one funny. I didn't agree with both situations, found the first petty (Jose and Conte) and the second downright fecking weird and unnecessary (Pep), one was funny though.
The disproportionate response is relative. A manager of one of our biggest rivals did something that people considered fecking stupid in an extremely odd manner, as a result most of them made comments in jest. I myself said he was on Coce - it was jokingly. I sincerely doubt some people on here genuinely think he's got serious mental health problems or on drugs. Even if he is, I really don't give a shit, that's his decision. Jurgen Klopp gets made fun of to death when he has similar outbursts but no-one bats an eye. Pep is involved and suddenly everyone is so fecking soft.
Speaking to a player on the pitch isn't unprofessional - you're not stupid, you know I was referring to the manner in which he did it. If I sprinted up to another worker at my work and started flailing my hands around, screaming in his face, I would most likely get called into HR. It's unprofessional, you could act like that with your mates and they'd think your fecking weird ffs, let alone another professional. let alone one that has an image to withhold and is regularly on national television. I also don't think making the comment he made was necessary and could be deemed unprofessional, making a statement like that to a club like Southampton with limited resources, when you're managing probably the most expensive squad in the PL's history just seems cheap to me, whether or not you agree is up to you. If he really felt all teams should play positively, why didn't he approach other team's who have parked the bus against him. He could have done so in private, which raises the question, why was this scenario different?
Comparing him to SAF is way off imo. Mind games and confrontations with other managers is basic stuff. It's done through pressers and as a way to get a mental edge though. Pep doing what he did literally has little to no benefit. The game was over, they won and it wasn't even a direct message to the manager - he was expressing his opinions to the players, knowing full and well that the manager will find out about it. Like I've said multiple times, he's not an idiot, he knows why they were playing the way they were, just a very unnecessary message to make. There's playing mind games in the pressers to get an advantage, then there's sprinting to opposition players to express an opinion that shouldn't have been expressed to players who could become disheartened with their manager. He himself acknowledged it was wrong, evident by his apology.
How was he making it a public comment? Consider how he presented the opinion. He could have had many chances to tell Redmond that after the game. In the tunnels, in the dressing rooms, before he boards the bus etc. He chose to literally sprint onto the pitch after a winner in the dying seconds of the game, only to express the opinion in front of the stadium. He knows fully well that people would pick up on it. If he didn't want to make it public he could have chosen a more suitable setting. You could suggest in the heat of the moment that he wasn't thinking and just acted - which might be true, but that doesn't justify his actions. Still makes them wrong.
On your points:
1. I agree.
2. I agree.
3. I don't think many people were as much offended as they were weirded out. It was an extremely odd situation. The inconsistency might have also frustrated some. Jose gets a ban for kicking a water bottle that literally didn't involve anyone else, but Pep basically gets into someone's face acting like a lunatic and is seemingly going to get off scott free.
4. I agree, but I don't really think many people were being serious with those comments. (I hope so, anyway).
I agree though, we don't seem to be on the same page in this topic, it is quite a controversial one. I've posted in this thread enough though and it really is getting tedious now, everyone is just repeating the same stuff over and over - so I digress. Let's just agree to disagree.