The Telegraph's Top 25 players to ever grace the Premier League

BarstoolProphet

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,701
Henry should be first for me. Then Ronaldo. I don't see why Giggs' longevity should earn him a place above the Frenchman or many of the others in the list for that matter. And where is Agüero?
 

BarstoolProphet

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,701
People make it sound like this in and of itself isn't impressive and isn't worthy of taking to account. Giggs in his prime was an incredible footballer regardless of not being the best and his longevity was something very special. Those two things together earn him that spot. If it was based purely off a players ability then it'd be different, but there's a lot of factors to take into account.
It is very impressive but he never reached Henry's and Ronaldo's sensational level. Shearer is a hard one for me. Clearly his stats shows that he perhaps should be top but Ronaldo and Henry (and Suárez for a short while) were far more exciting to watch overall.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
23,234
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Bit of a shit list really. If we are going on people who contributed to the premier league, then I'd have:

1. Giggs
2. Scholes
3. Ronaldo
4. Keane
5. Neville
6. Rooney
7. Cantona
8. Henry
9. Schmichael
10. Ferdinand


To have so few United players high up is silly. We've been by far the best team. to exclude Evra, Vidic, De Gea, Irwin and Carrick off there is madness.
 

De Selby

Scottish
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
6,868
Location
Jive-Ass Honky
Supports
Guangzhou Pharmaceutical F.C.
Still think Denis Irwin is the best full-back of the PL era so far, so he should be on the list.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
50,014
Location
London
Would swap Giggs with Henry, and put Aguero somewhere there.

I think that longevity matters and Ronaldo shouldn't be in top 5 considering that he gave just 3 great seasons in England.

Kompany above Vidic is absurd. Both Evra and Irwin should be ahead of Neville IMO.
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,479
Crap list and very strange. Giggs for me was never a GOAT EPL player even at our own club (i.e. our best player in the EPL era), let alone for everyone else. He is there for longevity reasons only, Ronaldo and Henry should be in the top 2.
 

Smoking_Owl

Account closed by request: 23/11/17
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
1,004
Evra 100% deserves to be there ahead of Kompany too.
 

Dyslexic Untied

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
10,972
Location
Oslo
Bit of a shit list really. If we are going on people who contributed to the premier league, then I'd have:

1. Giggs
2. Scholes
3. Ronaldo
4. Keane
5. Neville
6. Rooney
7. Cantona
8. Henry
9. Schmichael
10. Ferdinand


To have so few United players high up is silly. We've been by far the best team. to exclude Evra, Vidic, De Gea, Irwin and Carrick off there is madness.
You would really have Gary Neville above Henry?

IMO the list is quite fair. Tough call whether Henry or Giggs should be top, could go either way. As many have mentioned Aguero should probably be there. Vidic maybe, but hard to look past Adams. Would have to be at the expense of Kompany. Other than that, I think Beckham should have been somewhat higher - perhaps where Toure is.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,802
Ronaldo and Suarez really should be higher. I'd even argue Berkamp should be higher. Also like others have said, where is Aguero?
Why should Suarez be higher? Only had one great season really and won feck all.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
50,014
Location
London
Why should Suarez be higher? Only had one great season really and won feck all.
2 great seasons. On 12-13 he was great, IMO the best player in the league despite that Bale won the award (Bale was the best in the second half of the season, but during the entire course of the season, I think that both him and RVP were better).

Him winning feck all makes his position justified there IMO.

I actually think that the list is alright. Would have Aguero, Vidic, RvN and Evra (or Irwin) above Kompany, Yaya, Cole and Neville but otherwise it is fine IMO.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
50,014
Location
London
What would La Liga be like? (only including the time span of premier league)

1-Messi
2-Ronaldo
3-Ronaldinho
4-Zidane
5-Raul
6-Xavi
7-Puyol
8-Valerón
9-Albelda
10-Iniesta

Hard to do this. I think the right way is to rank how the players impacted the league. (That's why I put Valeron ahead of Iniesta, he gave a title to A Coruña)
I would go with:

1. Messi
2. Ronaldo
3. Xavi
4. Ronaldinho
5. Iniesta
6. Raul
7. Zidane
8. Casillas
9. Puyol
10. Figo
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
50,014
Location
London
Typical revisionism. Ronaldo is a level above Giggs. And what were these consistent 30+/ assists and goals seasons?
Actually, he is a few levels above Giggs, but in EPL he had 3 great seasons (1 out of this world), a good one and two frustrating one. Giggs had 20 good seasons, which put him higher in an EPL list IMO.

I think that Henry should be in the first place cause he had 7 great seasons (arguably each of them being better than any season of Giggs).
 

Murray3007

Full Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,746
great thing about football is it brings out everyones personal opinions, its a hard thing to judge something like this as you really need some sort of criteria to work from, could be which 25 players have won the most league titles, who has scored the most goals, who was the most entertaining, could be from players who won the player of the year award and plenty other options for criteria, the list aint to bad, would have around 18 out of the 25 i think, would be adding in the likes of Irwin, Vidic, VDS, RVN, Aguero, Essien, Makelele, could even argue a case for Mahrez from last season's stunning season. without a certain criteria seems its just one guys personal opinion.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
Kompany sticks out like a sore thumb there. Perhaps Suarez and Toure too but I guess it's down to their scoring records in their respective positions.
 

Smoking_Owl

Account closed by request: 23/11/17
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
1,004
The subjectivity with these lists always evolves around how much weight you give longevity vs. peak performance.

If it was simply a question of who played at the highest level in any sort reasonable time period (a few months - a season) then the answer for me would be Suarez of 13-14. I don't think anyone reached that level in the PL before, either statistically or aesthetically.

If you want the blend with longevity, which is another question, then it's Henry all day for me.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,408
Location
Manchester
The subjectivity with these lists always evolves around how much weight you give longevity vs. peak performance.

If it was simply a question of who played at the highest level in any sort reasonable time period (a few months - a season) then the answer for me would be Suarez of 13-14. I don't think anyone reached that level in the PL before, either statistically or aesthetically.

If you want the blend with longevity, which is another question, then it's Henry all day for me.
Ronaldo of 06-08 was definitely better, and Henry as well but I'd struggle to pinpoint specific years for him.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,802
The subjectivity with these lists always evolves around how much weight you give longevity vs. peak performance.

If it was simply a question of who played at the highest level in any sort reasonable time period (a few months - a season) then the answer for me would be Suarez of 13-14. I don't think anyone reached that level in the PL before, either statistically or aesthetically.

If you want the blend with longevity, which is another question, then it's Henry all day for me.
Bale, Ronaldo and Henry definitely reached those levels.
 

Sparky10Legend

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,943
As long as Zola isn't in there I'm fine.

Irwin - better than Cole and GNev
Vidic - should be in*
Drogba - tad generous imo, big game player yes but. ....

*Not at the expense of Tony Adams though, Adams was a better player for far longer than Vida
 

Super_Mario

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
210
Location
Gee Cross
Irwin should be ahead of Neville, Aguero instead of Cole. Rooney is to low down the list, I'd have him ahead of Bergkamp and Scholes is number one.
 

RC89

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
3,014
Actually, he is a few levels above Giggs, but in EPL he had 3 great seasons (1 out of this world), a good one and two frustrating one. Giggs had 20 good seasons, which put him higher in an EPL list IMO.

I think that Henry should be in the first place cause he had 7 great seasons (arguably each of them being better than any season of Giggs).
I actually agree with this 100%. But I held back and only said one level so as not to sound like I'm bashing Giggs' contributions. And yes, in terms of overall contribution to the league Giggs is probably #1 but my question was simply if Giggs was ever anywhere near Ronaldo 07/08, in fact I don't believe Giggs ever reached the level of Ronaldo of 06/07 but that's a closer call.

I'm having a hard time understanding what this list is based on. If it's on how good the player is, Ronaldo and Henry should be 1 & 2. If it's based on contribution to the league, Kompany shouldn't be anywhere on it.
 
Last edited:

Lurpak99

Buttered up
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
2,399
Location
Denmark
Was Gary Neville a better fullback than Denis Irwin? I know that Alan Hansen has said that if he was to pick the best Premier League XI ever, he would pick Irwin at right and left back.

Irwin seemed maybe more consistent and perhaps better all around
Irwin is one of the most underrated footballers ever.
 

Wooly Red

New Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
962
Supports
Liverpool
Why should Suarez be higher? Only had one great season really and won feck all.
Because he was bloody awesome, and still is bloody awesome, so he's a good player that didn't do a one-season wonder. I am thinking on the basis of quality though.
 

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,802
Because he was bloody awesome, and still is bloody awesome, so he's a good player that didn't do a one-season wonder. I am thinking on the basis of quality though.
Accomplishments in other leagues doesn't matter otherwise Ronaldo would've been a clear winner.
 

Smoking_Owl

Account closed by request: 23/11/17
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
1,004
Ronaldo of 06-08 was definitely better, and Henry as well but I'd struggle to pinpoint specific years for him.
I don't think so. Suarez got 31 goals and 12 assists in 33 PL games while his general play was also dazzling, bringing the best out of many players around him. He dragged an average team to within an inch of the PL title. None of Ronaldo or Henry's peak seasons in the PL match it IMO.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,408
Location
Manchester
I don't think so. Suarez got 31 goals and 12 assists in 33 PL games while his general play was also dazzling, bringing the best out of many players around him. He dragged an average team to within an inch of the PL title. None of Ronaldo or Henry's peak seasons in the PL match it IMO.
Nah, just not true at all.
 

Massive Spanner

The Football Grinch
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,594
Location
Tool shed
I do agree that Suarez was arguably the best individual season from any EPL player, arguably surpassing Ronaldo 07/08 and Henry 03/04. Especially when you consider the 'quality' he was working with in contrast.
 

Smoking_Owl

Account closed by request: 23/11/17
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
1,004
Nah, just not true at all.
I'm actually underselling Suarez a bit.

He scored 31 non penalty goals in 33 appearances for an average side. In Ronaldo and Henry's best goal scoring seasons (which still don't better Suarez's ratio), they had their goal stats padded by a handful of penalties.

I know it's hard to admit to yourself, but Suarez really was that good that season.
 

Massive Spanner

The Football Grinch
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,594
Location
Tool shed
Bit of a shit list really. If we are going on people who contributed to the premier league, then I'd have:

1. Giggs
2. Scholes
3. Ronaldo
4. Keane
5. Neville
6. Rooney
7. Cantona
8. Henry
9. Schmichael
10. Ferdinand


To have so few United players high up is silly. We've been by far the best team. to exclude Evra, Vidic, De Gea, Irwin and Carrick off there is madness.
I have to hand it to you, you truly have a special (and deluded) bias towards Man Utd unlike almost anything I've ever seen.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Cantona should be no.1, he absolutely won all Premier League titles he took part in (full season)
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,408
Location
Manchester
I'm actually underselling Suarez a bit.

He scored 31 non penalty goals in 33 appearances for an average side. In Ronaldo and Henry's best goal scoring seasons (which still don't better Suarez's ratio), they had their goal stats padded by a handful of penalties.

I know it's hard to admit to yourself, but Suarez really was that good that season.
So you want to take penalties out of the equation but you're happy to include 5 goals against Norwich and a lack of goals against top level opposition?

Your attempt to indicate bias in that last sentence is laughable, I'm not saying Suarez wasn't good I'm simply pointing out that Ronaldo and Henry both had much better seasons.
 

Massive Spanner

The Football Grinch
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,594
Location
Tool shed
'Much better seasons' is really stretching it. I can see why people would rate the Ronaldo and Henry seasons higher but 'much better'? No way.

Look at the teams they played in in comparison to Suarez!
 

POF

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
3,798
Vidic is the obvious glaring omission. Jaap Stam is the only defender in the Premier League era who is arguably at the same level. During and post the Ronaldo era that United team was built around the Vidic led defence. He could play next to Jonny Evans and in front of Thomas Kuszczak and still make the defence look strong.

I agree re Irwin. He's a top class player but as a full back wasn't anywhere near as influential as Vidic.
 

Sparky10Legend

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,943
Everything in this post is wrong. All of it.

Zola = Nice guy but had a season not even as good as Payet just had. But because he's a nice guy....... After that first 2/3 full season's he was a bit part player. Facht

Adams = Better than Vida, dont see whats "wrong" about that.

Irwin = Dont know how old you are but the reality is Irwin could play either side/score goals/never injured. Cole was a better defender (just) but when you factor all other issues in.

Wiki checked my facts and it appears he was a starter for longer than i thought, my point still stands though.
 
Last edited: