So the way to discuss a game is ignore the first 30 minutes where we were superb, went 2-0 up and could have scored more, focus on a spell where Chelsea put us under pressure and pulled us back, say decisions saved us (ignoring the first sending off was completely justified and given when we were getting a foothold in the game and were through on goal to retake the lead), say we were getting battered with 11v10 (for about 5 minutes), lie and say they looked like beating us with 9 men, invent a scenario where with 11v11 they'd have definitely beat us (again, ignoring the only reason why it wasn't 11v11 is because one of their players denied one of ours a clear goalscoring opportunity, and that if they hadn't gone down to 10 we'd likely have been 3-2 up), and then top it off with a bit of griping about how shite we are?
I'd rather listen to Niall Quinn if I'm honest.