Ah, England. Country from Plymouth on west to Copenhagen on east.
I don’t think we do know United always test the waters, anything possible about United is turned into clickbait and we’re linked with every manager and player going. But, if we ever did, that was the past and “this lot” aren’t the Glazers. Ratcliffe doesn’t strike me as someone who does business in public (i.e. Berrada).. he has people due diligence, gets what he thinks is the best fit (available) and cracks on. I don’t know why people try and lump him/Ineos in with the Glazers, they’re nothing alike.The coaches we’re getting heavily linked with are England/Premier League based. It concerns me that we don’t appear to be looking more afar. You’d also hope this isn’t the case when it comes to signing players.
Come on now, yes United have click bait pieces but we’ve all done this dance before. We know nothing is secret, we know United test the waters when it comes to bringing in managers/players. We see this stuff get leaked. We saw it with Ten Hag and Poch, we saw it with Arnautovic. If Ten Hag is sacked it will with absolute certainty be one of these names we are getting linked with who replaces him. There won’t be some surprise candidate popping up.
The wording needs to be good on this one. I need a "not my first choice but wouldn't mind him" option. Or something that says I definitely prefer this guy over Southgate option.Can we get a Thomas Frank poll going in the United forum @mods? I'm curious how many would be for hiring Frank or outright against it.
He'd be ideal for United. Fast transitions, dont worry too much about controlling possession in the no 10 position - Bruno would absolutely thrive under Frank.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Imagine if he rejects them as well
I wasn't a big fan of him at Brøndby. Who are a big club in Danish terms.I think someone like him would shrink at Utd.
I think Frank is probably getting attention from United and Chelsea and Bayern, because he's done pretty well at Brentford (9th is great for them, 13th is solid and 16th is meh but they had a ton of injuries this year) and Brentford are sort of the counter-attacking/tactically flexible version of Brighton (good possession, don't spend a ton relative to results, developed players well), so the fact he's kept his job there and done okay probably appeals to front offices (that's what we call them in North America, do we have a term for DOF and all the other football execs?) who want a coach who will do okay in that structure.Why are we even considering this guy? Other 3 makes sense, but i just cant understand why this guy?
The other is supposedly De Zerbi, who I’m pretty sure is the guy who ends up Chelsea’s next manager. There’s nothing even remotely appealing about Thomas Frank at Chelsea.Apparently one of the two remaining candidates for the Chelsea job, not exactly inspiring if you’re a Chelsea fan IMO