Jim Beam
Gets aroused by men in low socks
2nd in the league and still on for the sextulple this season.
Sack him now, get Avram back in as caretaker.
2nd in the league and still on for the sextulple this season.
Sack him now, get Avram back in as caretaker.
Yes we did, open your god damn eyes.No, I don’t think you did.
Strange. You reel off a load of excuses without addressing any of the points I madeThe state of this, we have had no luck with injuries, covid. The only team in the league to want to have a game postponed rejected, our team is knackered. We lost 2 more players to injury tonight. Klopp is allowed to build his team, Pep won nothing in his first season and was allowed to spend a shit load. But you judge Tuchel after 1 year in charge which he won a champions league.
Spurs literally drew yesterday 1-1 to a team that had 10 players for the whole second half. Spurs who are much fresher too.
Wum, reportedYes we did, open your god damn eyes.
Anyone expecting a title challenge when we keep having to play a half fit Jorginho every match along with the likes of Saul and Barkley, clearly isn't being very objective. Our squad is great to backup the main team in normal times. We're not like City who just can field 2 first teams.As for your points no one cares about Chelsea;s injuries or illness when they've got the squad they have
How does your spending compare to City's since Guardiola arrived in 2016?Anyone expecting a title challenge when we keep having to play a half fit Jorginho every match along with the likes of Saul and Barkley, clearly isn't being very objective. Our squad is great to backup the main team in normal times. We're not like City who just can field 2 first teams.
They didn't lose so it's not a debate really.It is Chelsea. He would be starring down the barrel if he loses today with City and Spurs to come.
Abramovic would have been expecting a title challenge after spending 100 million on a new forward, not a public falling out and a top 4 battle.
I would not be at all surprised if he were to lose today and lose to City that he would be gone. You can’t say it’s knee jerk when they have so much previous for this kind of thing…
Have they already sacked a manager before January who won them the CL in the prior season? CHECK
Have they sacked a club legend because he was only battling for top 4? CHECK
It’s not knee jerk in the slightest with this club. Tuchel is no different from anyone else.
13 managers since 2007. He is just another one charged with immediate and continued success. If you don’t keep it up…you’re done.
It's a tongue in cheek thread as far as I know and every bump is kind of tongue in cheek with a hint of 'you never know it's Chelsea' sprinkled in.I can’t believe there is sack watch thread for him(though Chelsea are Chelsea). He was never going to challenge city like everybody else and currently is a CL winning manager who is 2nd in the league.
The problem for all teams is City’s ruthlessness even if you rate other PL teams higher in history this city side require you to get 90+ points to challenge which is near impossible
You think he'll get sacked if we go out of the Champs league and are 2nd? Or if we finish where we did last season (4th)?They didn't lose so it's not a debate really.
But had he lost he still wouldn't have been sacked.
He will be when/if they get knocked out of Europe and are still in the same position in the league.
No I know it is as Pep has one too but still some post are serious about him being a bit in trouble when obviously he is not and is doing wellIt's a tongue in cheek thread as far as I know and every bump is kind of tongue in cheek with a hint of 'you never know it's Chelsea' sprinkled in.
We're 4th in net spend over that period with ~€291m spent. Man United are first with ~€671m outgoing, City second with ~€645m out (staggeringly Arsenal are 3rd and Everton are 5th by this metric; Liverpool are 12th).How does your spending compare to City's since Guardiola arrived in 2016?
The difference in ranking between net and gross is staggering. No club knows selling like ChelseaWe're 4th in net spend over that period with ~€291m spent. Man United are first with ~€671m outgoing, City second with ~€645m out (staggeringly Arsenal are 3rd and Everton are 5th by this metric; Liverpool are 12th).
That said, this is largely a function of how good we are at selling players (and to an extent how vital this is for our accounting), as we are second behind City with €1.01b spent versus their €1.06b on outlays.
Yeah here's a very good thread on Chelsea's most recently published financials - we are more dependent than just about anyone on selling players:The difference in ranking between net and gross is staggering. No club knows selling like Chelsea
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He's definitely gone if you finish 4th. Distant 3rd with a CL exit in say QF might mean he's gone as well. CL SFs or 2nd place finish will mean he'll survive, but then you know never know with ChelseaYou think he'll get sacked if we go out of the Champs league and are 2nd? Or if we finish where we did last season (4th)?
Yeah there are some that getting a bit ahead of themselves for sure.No I know it is as Pep has one too but still some post are serious about him being a bit in trouble when obviously he is not and is doing well
I don't think we've ever sacked a manager who finished top 4. Can't see why we'd start with someone who has already won the big one.He's definitely gone if you finish 4th. Distant 3rd with a CL exit in say QF might mean he's gone as well. CL SFs or 2nd place finish will mean he'll survive, but then you know never know with Chelsea
Ancelotti might have something to say about thatI don't think we've ever sacked a manager who finished top 4. Can't see why we'd start with someone who has already won the big one.
True. My memory is not what it was!Ancelotti might have something to say about that
I don’t think I will.Yes we did, open your god damn eyes.
Not anymore.He managed a 2-2 against a significantly better team, hardly grounds for getting upset.
Nah, Liverpool still play at a different level to Chelsea in most games.Not anymore.
If you finish 4th and don't win a trophy, then yes there's a good chance.You think he'll get sacked if we go out of the Champs league and are 2nd? Or if we finish where we did last season (4th)?
Strange, I didn't make any excuses, everything i said was factual.Strange. You reel off a load of excuses without addressing any of the points I made
As for your points no one cares about Chelsea;s injuries or illness when they've got the squad they have
They literally cannotAnyone expecting a title challenge when we keep having to play a half fit Jorginho every match along with the likes of Saul and Barkley, clearly isn't being very objective. Our squad is great to backup the main team in normal times. We're not like City who just can field 2 first teams.
Where was this energy at the beginning of the season? Think about this, for many people on here, Ole was expected to be within 5 points of the winners in order to have a successful season, and I'm supposed to believe Tuchel should be held to worse standards?I can’t believe there is sack watch thread for him(though Chelsea are Chelsea). He was never going to challenge city like everybody else and currently is a CL winning manager who is 2nd in the league.
The problem for all teams is City’s ruthlessness even if you rate other PL teams higher in history this city side require you to get 90+ points to challenge which is near impossible
Last two managers to finish top 4 and win nothing kept their job.If you finish 4th and don't win a trophy, then yes there's a good chance.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Stunning couple.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date