sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,063
Yay or nay? And if you're going add that much, why not just have an in-play clock?
If they do that, they need to reduce the time played. There needs to be a solution but the players couldn't do 90 minutes of full playing time without drastically reducing the intensity, which would make for a boring spectacle.Stoppage time has always been too short. We've seen from the studies that the ball is only in play for 50 odd minutes and they don't add on 30+
I agree though that the real solution is to stop the clock when the ball is out of play and end it dead on 90 mins.
It's better than before, but hopefully they will soon realise this is a bit of madness as well and they need to switch to 2x30' with time stoppages.
Hopefully this is the end-game indeed. Trials probably need to take place to work out the ideal time.Huge yay and I think it'll lead eventually to an in-play clock.
Why is it ridiculous? It’s ridiculous to give 3-5 minutes regardless of what happens in the game.I get the need to address time wasting, but the added time has been getting ridiculous
This is the best solution.It's better than before, but hopefully they will soon realise this is a bit of madness as well and they need to switch to 2x30' with time stoppages.
They should communicate the time added on in injury time - hold up the board again and change the TV graphic, at least, for transparency.Why is it ridiculous? It’s ridiculous to give 3-5 minutes regardless of what happens in the game.
Yup, I've long been in favour of this idea. I can only hope this is the first step towards that goal.It's better than before, but hopefully they will soon realise this is a bit of madness as well and they need to switch to 2x30' with time stoppages.
That doesn't really fit the mentality out there though I reckon. Stop yourselves from building up momentum so you can have more time to start the process over?It may not eliminate time wasting if the team needing a goal starts time wasting to get more time on the clock so they can score.
Is this an actual policy? Or just a reflection of the crazy amount of brain injuries?!Yay or nay? And if you're going add that much, why not just have an in-play clock?
I’m not sure you’ve thought this through.It may not eliminate time wasting if the team needing a goal starts time wasting to get more time on the clock so they can score.