This is dude is IndyKaila bad.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bullshitter?
This is dude is IndyKaila bad.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bullshitter?
I think this time next year everyone will be saying Rodri is the best CM in the world at least DM.Is he as good as Longstaff?
Why do people assume that Madrid will be interested in a loan deal where they pay majority of the wages? What do they get from that? Their problem now is that they don’t want him and he’s in very high wages, so there’s no point in sending him away on loan with Madrid playing most of his wages. If a loan deal does happen, Madrid won’t pay more than 25% if his wagesReckon Atletico would be smart to try and sign Bale on a two year loan deal from Madrid (with Madrid paying most o his wages).
Aye, I guess time will tell how they develop. It's actually the first time in a while I am not too disappointed about us signing some promising youngsters. But yeah, our transfer policy has been a shambles since SAF left.We'll see how he develops. But my point was that we're apparently spending 30m on Longstaff, and we're okay to see how he develops. Why not spend 40 on a guy who is proven in the league, has played internationally and is only a year older? I just don't understand anything about our transfer policy, and the fact that Leicester and teams like that complete these deals so easily is baffling.
My thoughts exactly although Longstaff better not cost 30m. Tielemans is a very good player and someone I would take 100 times over SL. But I guess we are sticking to the British model, which I believe we are using to keep our players from wanting to leave us if we stay crap. Pesky foreigners wanting to play for better clubs, how dare they.We'll see how he develops. But my point was that we're apparently spending 30m on Longstaff, and we're okay to see how he develops. Why not spend 40 on a guy who is proven in the league, has played internationally and is only a year older? I just don't understand anything about our transfer policy, and the fact that Leicester and teams like that complete these deals so easily is baffling.
He's a lazy cnut and he gets injured all the time. He would hate Simeone and vice-versa. Plus, Real are not going to pay him to play on the other side of town at a team that's finished above them the last two seasons and may very well do again next.Reckon Atletico would be smart to try and sign Bale on a two year loan deal from Madrid (with Madrid paying most o his wages).
What do you think everyone will be saying about Longstaff in a years time?I think this time next year everyone will be saying Rodri is the best CM in the world at least DM.
Yes.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bullshitter?
Whats the point in having a tier system when people are allowed to post shite like this?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bullshitter?
Gotta laugh but Rodri was an obvious one. We're going around offering 70m for Maguire but not potentially the best CDM of the next 10 years. Well done Pep and City. Great signing and still value for money.Is he as good as Longstaff?
Better than paying 100% of the wages and getting the same use out of him? 25% of €600k is €150k a week, over two years that's over 15m, of course they'd be interested, maybe not to Atletico as @Inter Yer Nan said.Why do people assume that Madrid will be interested in a loan deal where they pay majority of the wages? What do they get from that? Their problem now is that they don’t want him and he’s in very high wages, so there’s no point in sending him away on loan with Madrid playing most of his wages. If a loan deal does happen, Madrid won’t pay more than 25% if his wages
Madrid are committed to a contract that if to be believed is £600k a week. Thats in essence a sunk cost as they say they don't want Bale in the team. I'm sure there is a balance, but they might genuinely rather use a youth player as backup than Bale in which case as backup backup the value of that is small, maybe £50k a week.Why do people assume that Madrid will be interested in a loan deal where they pay majority of the wages? What do they get from that? Their problem now is that they don’t want him and he’s in very high wages, so there’s no point in sending him away on loan with Madrid playing most of his wages. If a loan deal does happen, Madrid won’t pay more than 25% if his wages
I'm not sure. He's probably two years behind Rodri's development so we don't know his ceiling. My guess is that in 12 months he'll look a bargain and we'll be happy we've got him though.What do you think everyone will be saying about Longstaff in a years time?
This doesn't make sense, if a player doesn't want to sign for you, throwing money at club is pointless.Gotta laugh but Rodri was an obvious one. We're going around offering 70m for Maguire but not potentially the best CDM of the next 10 years. Well done Pep and City. Great signing and still value for money.
Lukaku and Herrera aren’t good enough anyway so not bothered at all. Pogba would be a loss but it’s also not like he’s been an absolute monster for us either. He’ll be offered a new contract let’s see.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
Fine with Lukaku leaving, the other two less so. Losing Pogba when we have so many gaping holes already and with no obvious replacement on the market would be especially awful.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
Lukaku - is not a major problem. Herrera for free is bad. Pogba I would like to keep - but Pogba can practically finance 2 quality signings. Which is good for a player who doesnt want to be here.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
75% of the wages and they might well be tempted.We should make a 2 year loan bid for Bale.. 50% of the wages..
There is no way Madrid would accept it... just for a laugh.
Would any one be willing to make a Free XI team comprised of freebies that Bayern Munich and Juventus have nabbed over the years.I have a feeling DDG to Juventus for free is actually going to happen.
I'll miss Herrera, he was a good player. Great attitude - should have been our captain for me - and just about the only player in this often lifeless team I felt any kind of connection to.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
Disastrous with the players we are linked with.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
It would obviously depend on who the replacements were. I think it's quite possible to upgrade on all three players, but I'm not wholly convinced we would actually manage to do it.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
That's probably fair. If Lukaku, Herrera and Pogba are replaced by Ben Yedder, Longstaff and Bruno Fernandes, the side will have gone backwards in my view.Disastrous with the players we are linked with.
Ffs. City are getting more and more strong. Tough times for all the clubs in the prem. Hope they don't win the CL next season.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
At the start of the summer, potentially, we were looking to add RB, RW, CB, CM and CDM. We were always aware of Herrera leaving. Now throw into the mix, the possibility, of Pogba, Lukaku and De Gea leaving. De Gea is less likely, though if he's not signing that extension, I'd rather we sell than a free next summer. A lot of positions to potentially fill, something that can't be done within one transfer window. Again, this all merely hypothetical.Potentially Losing Pogba, Lukaku & Hererra in one window doesn't sound ideal for United. What's the Caf's thoughts if those three were to leave this summer?
We'll never know I guess. If he would've came. A release clause is a release clause. Had we coughed up like City have it may have happened. Young and hungry player.This doesn't make sense, if a player doesn't want to sign for you, throwing money at club is pointless.
is he helping them come up with a plan to raise quick money? Otherwise that's just a waste of time.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Well agreeing a release clause is with the selling club. However, there is also a player's wish to join whatever team he wants. For example, De Ligt had his release clause met by multiple teams (including us, if Reddit ITKs are to be believed). Its who he decides to join thats important.We'll never know I guess. If he would've came. A release clause is a release clause. Had we coughed up like City have it may have happened. Young and hungry player.
I read he's hoping to be back for pre-season.Has Sean Longstaff recovered from his injury then?
He’s been running and back kicking ball for around 3 weeks.Has Sean Longstaff recovered from his injury then?
He was back running a month agoHas Sean Longstaff recovered from his injury then?