Funny how we’re on course to spend over 100M
Mount is the Only one for whom United have made official Bids , Onana Links are mostly pushed by Italian Sources yet to be corroborated by Usual Credible English one . But OP is also dealing in Conjecture and Speculation which also seems far from actual reality as well .
I know it’s only Italian sources thus far, but seems far too much smoke for their not to be a fire. Fingers crossed it’s something of substance
We definitely need a New Keeper and he seem to fit the profile with the added bonus of having played for Ten Hag already . Hopefully he is at least in conversation .
By all accounts we have only bid for Mount.
The point the season ended and thr glazers were still in charge, the history speaks for itself at how incompetent we are in transfer windows with yhe leeches and throw in the fact that they have left the club in limbo with how much transfer funds are available whilst they try to milk The club out of as much money as possible as they string out the sale as long as possible for their own selfish gain
Depends on the mentality of the player, they don't usually just accept drastically reduced terms. Imagine you got a huge payrise at work and then when it came to renewal you thought you did a good job and they said they'd offer you a contract with reduced pay, would you stay on and work as hard? If De Gea recognises that he isn't worth the contract he got before then that's not really a mindset we should have at this club, we should want players that look to improve year on year.
Until both are in the door I’m not counting any chickens
Just me being overly optimistic as always
I admire your optimism and normally I’m the same but reality has bitten me this yearJust me being overly optimistic as always
Fair Enough but Dan Sheldon doesn't seem to have much of track record to go on , so hard to figure out his credibility .
How exactly is sanctioning more funds from an existing credit line going to affect anything for the Glazers? Don’t get the connection there.
There isn’t any, it’s more media conjecture and making up stories, first it was FFP now it’s The Glazers why the club are not spending because they don’t want to use their credit card which they’ve paid off minus £40m, leaving £260m plus £70m cash reserves. Jesus you couldn’t make up the inept reporting on the club, if we spend £250m at most we will actually spend £25m in signing on and Agent fees plus £70-80m actual payments to the clubs as most deals will be amortised over 4/5 years.
Especially more likely with the new FSP rules
I thought our transfers will come from the 200M credit line, so it will have nothing to do with the glazers. Due to be cleared down to 40M giving us 160M. I'm pretty the amount we will spend will be down to FFP not the glazers.
Isn't that the case with all summer transfers though? Even the ones that have already been announced don't officially go through until July 1. So I don't think it makes a difference.
So we should just sign the high contract extension we offered a while ago?
Agreed and hopefully we hear more positive news from the usual suspects like Ornstein, Stone or Whitwell
£90m on Antony.
He could have signed the contract when it was first offered to him.
Worry about the window when it's done. It's useless getting upset when thins can change in the blink of an eye one way or the other.
We literally had a face to face meeting with his agent recently.
I’m pretty apathetic about it. Resigned to the fact that this is how we will be run with glazers and their yes men in situ.
About meeting With Onana's agent , would be wary of believing it unless it's reported by some of the credible English sources .
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yeah we all know it basically reads as Mount joins Utd next week and Caicedo goes to Chelsea
