Red00012
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 12,277
I’d take James any day of the week.Adama Traore is a much better player than him.
I’d take James any day of the week.Adama Traore is a much better player than him.
Rashford started as an ice cold finisher with good ball control and decent dribbling to say the least. James is none of these. He may very well be a decent player for United but I doubt it. At our peak Nani was a squad player and he is on a whole different level to James. Even when he signed for us at what 18 ? James is playing poor and looks like what he is ATM a championship or lower level premiership player who surprised people at start of season as they didn't know much about him. However it's hardly his fault were relying on him would much rather have Sanchez in team ATM and that should say somethingRashford started off as a kick and rush player with the head down. Took him a while to shake it off . James needs to do it fast and figure out something else but at the moment I’m struggling to see what he can actually bring to the team.
Was not trying toOk you convinced me.
He does nothing better than Traore.I’d take James any day of the week.
A 22 year old kid. Like the 27 year old Lingard kid. The British adult kids.Give the lad a chance FFS.
He's a kid, playing far more than he should be, in his first year at this level.
We're too dependant on him, but thats not his fault.
You say this like he didn't play in the Championship last season at age 20/21. He didn't dominate that league. Compare him with 19 year old Zaha in the Championship and it's clear that despite being at a younger age, Zaha had the better performance in the 2nd division.Of course hes not very good. Hes 22, in his first season in the top flight, and playing in a terribly disjointed team. I despair at some of our 'fans', desperate to either write players off or herald them as the next Messi. Give him a pre season and a half functional team and then make a judgement on him.
Lingards a complete fecking fraud, he's 27. I dont see how he comes into a discussion about James.A 22 year old kid. Like the 27 year old Lingard kid. The British adult kids.
Why does a player from the academy get 2-3 games at most to prove themselves, yet a player we sign gets 2-3 seasons to prove themselves? I don't need 2-3 seasons of James to know that he isn't good enough and never will be good enough. The reason is because he is so shit now that even if he improves somewhat, he still isn't good enough. We are not talking about a teenager. We are talking about a 22 year old. Lingard and Cleverley broke through as grown men. Neither were good enough. Lingard has always been shit yet we didn't get rid of him because the bar was low. The bar needs to be higher than Lingard at 22 and James at 22. Persisting with James, hoping he turns from shit to good, is a big mistake, just like it was with Lingard.Lingards a complete fecking fraud, he's 27. I dont see how he comes into a discussion about James.
James is 22, in his first year at this level, being played far too much.
If in a year or two he's not progressed, thats the time to question him.
If, in a year or twos time, we're still depending on him as a first team option then the question lies elsewhere.
Yeah, why is that? I've always wondered about that myself, never understood it. It's almost like it's completely made up.Why does a player from the academy get 2-3 games at most to prove themselves, yet a player we sign gets 2-3 seasons to prove themselves?
Why?I’d take James any day of the week.
You want to judge a young player after 2-3 games, good for you.Why does a player from the academy get 2-3 games at most to prove themselves, yet a player we sign gets 2-3 seasons to prove themselves? I don't need 2-3 seasons of James to know that he isn't good enough and never will be good enough. The reason is because he is so shit now that even if he improves somewhat, he still isn't good enough. We are not talking about a teenager. We are talking about a 22 year old. Lingard and Cleverley broke through as grown men. Neither were good enough. Lingard has always been shit yet we didn't get rid of him because the bar was low. The bar needs to be higher than Lingard at 22 and James at 22. Persisting with James, hoping he turns from shit to good, is a big mistake, just like it was with Lingard.
He's had a chance. I'm not saying feck off all players that aren't the best in the world at 22. I'm saying feck off all players that are shit at 22. There's a huge gap between best in the world and shit. The bar should not be set at shit. The bar should be set at good.You want to judge a young player after 2-3 games, good for you.
OK, let's feck off anyone who at 22 hasnt propelled themselves into b'allon dor reckonings after half a season in the PL.
Give him a chance is what I'm saying, not continue to see him as a youth prospect in 6 years.
He is shit, no matter how you want to say it, that's what it is.Give the lad a chance FFS.
He's a kid, playing far more than he should be, in his first year at this level.
We're too dependant on him, but thats not his fault.
He played leftwing. He's not first choice on the left, Rashford is. Rashford's injury is the reason United are losing or drawing games lately.People need to wake up about how weak we are in attack. He's been better than anyone should have expected pre season but there's no way he should be first choice for a team aiming for top 4.
We wouldn't fear any side with a front 3/4 featuring a championship winger + Mata and Pereira next season would we?
Not that I want those sort of players at the club, but right now he isn't even an effective kick and run merchant because he's got the upper body strength of Huaf Mata. Seriously, look at all of these boring types - like Aaron Lennon. Average player but he knew how to use his burst of pace using his body to ward off opponents as needed. James from what I can see hasn't learnt that.Kick and run all he has to his game. Expecting him to be able to cross efficiently at that speed is insane. Is not a good dribbler, does not have a good weight on his pass either. Can not hold the ball up well.The more he sprints the faster he tires, which is natural. An okayish signing at best.
Yeha his performance is in downward spiral. Ideally he should be used as sub against tiring defenders, playing him all the time doesn't help. He isn't ready, people forget this is his second season in his career.His lack of physical strength has been exposed this year at the highest level, he started out well enough too make me believe there is something there. Even up until the Burnley game, since the turn of the year there has been a general downward swing in performances.
As has been alluded too, it is probably because he is being asked too play more than he should, given that and the fact he lost his Dad no more than 7 months ago, I would imagine that it is all still pretty raw, where he had the start of his United career too get him through the initial shock of it all, now his professional life has settled into a pattern it would be natural for him too start dealing with the loss on a deeper level around about now. Especially after his first holiday period without him.
At worst, he will be a long term versatile squad option. Which is good for £12mil these days.
Its sad we havent had a good winger since Nani was sold. 5-6 years ago?!He is shit, no matter how you want to say it, that's what it is.
It is no fault of his that he is been relied upon for performances beyond his level.
Old and the management made their bed, hence they should lay on it.
Non of our front players are consistent enough but he is the worst of a bad bunch.
But he's so weak and doesn't have good positioning. Against Salah he caught up with him but then just fell of him. The slightest of nudges and he's down. Compare that to AWB defensively and how he bullies winger with his positioning and reaction and you'll see it's not a player you want anywhere near your defense.Genuinely think he’s a right back at best. He’s a very vertical player with high speed and energy. Don’t see the quality to be part of a front 3 at this level. Overlapping and crossing is about it from what I see.
There are many different types of full backs. He is similar to Max Aarons in stature, or the likes of Grimaldo etc. He’d be an attacking full back, but the point is, he doesn’t have the quality as part of a front three. But he’s rapid and vertical. Can only see that being of use coming from RB, where he’d just have to overlap/run straight and cross. It’s okay to be a kick and run full back, less so a forward.But he's so weak and doesn't have good positioning. Against Salah he caught up with him but then just fell of him. The slightest of nudges and he's down. Compare that to AWB defensively and how he bullies winger with his positioning and reaction and you'll see it's not a player you want anywhere near your defense.
It's not like he's good 1v1 or got a special cross on him so I really don't see why he'd be of any use as a right back. Better to hope when those counter-attack opportunties come against teams that aren't Burnley or Wolves that he's got the space to exploit that because that's the only time he shines.