I used to read Matt Bruenig's old blogs and he was arguing with people saying that trespassing is rape.On Norwegian foras around late 00s/early 10s we had a lot of "taxation is rape", or just comparisons to rape when they didn't want to be too literal. Did you guys over the pond ever have that? It was pretty parallel to the online Ron Paul craze.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I want to do a post hog joke but I can't find a way to make it funny and also it's not an appropriate time.I used to read Matt Bruenig's old blogs and he was arguing with people saying that trespassing is rape.
As someone in Missouri - this was actually put forward by a female Republican lawmaker, they claim it's to even up the dress code as apparently men have to ear a shirt, tie and jacket, but in reality it's an attempt to stop the men staring at their titsFunny how republicans spent years banging on about muslims infiltrating America and imposing sharia law.
Recent events suggest they'd be all for it.
You obviously don't know that before he was a judge one of his jobs was as a federal prosector, one of the ones that sent Timothy McVeigh to get the needle, that makes him well qualifiedI could have put this in The Biden Presidency thread, but I thought this is good food for thought overall about justice in American politics.
This should be the very last time that a judge is named as Attorney General. The next people to hold that office better be people already being active prosecutors or who last were prosecutors/district attorneys.
Glenn Kirschner or Preet Bharara should be the current AG.
I do know, but even then I don't feel he is qualified nor ruthless enough for what this job demands as of today. He better explain to me why it took a while before a special prosecutor was brought in regarding the documents found at Mar-a-Lago while it only took 2-3 days to name a special prosecutor for the documents involved with Joe Biden.You obviously don't know that before he was a judge one of his jobs was as a federal prosector, one of the ones that sent Timothy McVeigh to get the needle, that makes him well qualified
re: the special prosecutor, that's down to Republican's taking the house, if the Democrats had won that there wouldn't be either, he'll have to explain those decisions to a nutjob committee in the house and he'll not fancy that but by appointing both he can't be accused of taking sidesI do know, but even then I don't feel he is qualified nor ruthless enough for what this job demands as of today. He better explain to me why it took a while before a special prosecutor was brought in regarding the documents found at Mar-a-Lago while it only took 2-3 days to name a special prosecutor for the documents involved with Joe Biden.
Ruthlessness and fairness are the only things that should be asked from the Attorney General. Merrick Garland has shown gaping holes in both so far. He thinks too much like a judge rather than a prosecutor now.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Even after a judge told her to feck off as well, and ordered her to pay some of Hobbs' costs, she's just trying to stay relevant in Trump world so he's nice to herShe is still banging on about this even after Hobbs has been sworn in.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This has all the hallmarks of her flying to Mar-a-lago and Trump instructing her to never admit defeat by endlessly claiming fraud. Little does she know this makes her look like an even bigger loser.Even after a judge told her to feck off as well, and ordered her to pay some of Hobbs' costs, she's just trying to stay relevant in Trump world so he's nice to her
I know that as do you, but in Trump World a loser is someone who disagrees with the orange blob!This has all the hallmarks of her flying to Mar-a-lago and Trump instructing her to never admit defeat by endlessly claiming fraud. Little does she know this makes her look like an even bigger loser.
She’s been on a weekly appearance streak at MaL for weeks now. It’s quite sad.This has all the hallmarks of her flying to Mar-a-lago and Trump instructing her to never admit defeat by endlessly claiming fraud. Little does she know this makes her look like an even bigger loser.
No it's not, it's great seeing people making right tits of themselves time and time againShe’s been on a weekly appearance streak at MaL for weeks now. It’s quite sad.
Don't get me wrong, I revel in shit like this. My 'sorrow' is very superficial & fleeting.No it's not, it's great seeing people making right tits of themselves time and time again
snapDon't get me wrong, I revel in shit like this. My 'sorrow' is very superficial & fleeting.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Imagine having a system with more than two parties.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I read that as pastries and I am just going to stick to that. Onward the pastry party!Imagine having a system with more than two parties.
That is ostensibly what Independents have become - a third party of sorts that coagulate behind candidates and policies over a particular party.Imagine having a system with more than two parties.
In the end they still have to vote D/R though, so it's not an alternative at all, is it? You might as well call non-voters a party.That is ostensibly what Independents have become - a third party of sorts that coagulate behind candidates and policies over a particular party.
They vote D or R but that means both have to vie for their support, which tacitly dilutes the power of both parties in pursuit of voters outside their respective basesIn the end they still have to vote D/R though, so it's not an alternative at all, is it? You might as well call non-voters a party.
That's still not nearly the same as having another party or two though.They vote D or R but that means both have to vie for their support, which tacitly dilutes the power of both parties in pursuit of voters outside their respective bases
Yeah there’s not going to be a viable third party in American politics anytime soon, mainly because any attempt to start one will result in one of the two parties subsuming the platform of the new party, thereby rendering it useless. Independents are the only voting block that are a check on the two parties.That's still not nearly the same as having another party or two though.
It's the "you hate to see it but you love to see it" cliche.No it's not, it's great seeing people making right tits of themselves time and time again
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You mean Lake v Sinema v Dem candidate. Sinema running might actually help the Dems as Sinema could pick off some of the "not crazy" GOP votes.
I think the Dems may consider not running anyone since it would merely split Sinema's votes and gift the election to the R.You mean Lake v Sinema v Dem candidate. Sinema running might actually help the Dems as Sinema could pick off some of the "not crazy" GOP votes.
On what planet is Sinema any better than an R candidate? She votes with the Rs, she grandstands against the Democrats and she attention seeks. Shes the worst of all worlds. At least an R wouldn’t waste Democrat’s time and money when it comes to a close vote.I think the Dems may consider not running anyone since it would merely split Sinema's votes and gift the election to the R.
She actually votes mostly with Dems. The few cases when she hasn't typically get blown up because they make it harder for Biden to pass a particular piece of legislation (this is also the case with Manchin). That won't change whether she's an independent or a Dem, but she would be infinitely better than any R MAGA grifter.On what planet is Sinema any better than an R candidate? She votes with the Rs, she grandstands against the Democrats and she attention seeks. Shes the worst of all worlds. At least an R wouldn’t waste Democrat’s time and money when it comes to a close vote.
Exactly - the Dems don't run against Sanders or the other independent (King I think it is) do they?She actually votes mostly with Dems. The few cases when she hasn't typically get blown up because they make it harder for Biden to pass a particular piece of legislation (this is also the case with Manchin). That won't change whether she's an independent or a Dem, but she would be infinitely better than any R MAGA grifter.
Congratulations, everything you just said is completely wrong.On what planet is Sinema any better than an R candidate? She votes with the Rs, she grandstands against the Democrats and she attention seeks. Shes the worst of all worlds. At least an R wouldn’t waste Democrat’s time and money when it comes to a close vote.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date